Department of the Army awards $37.3M contract for Blatchford-Preston Complex Phase 2 construction
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $37,334,850 ($37.3M)
Contractor: RDE JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-12-16
End Date: 2015-07-22
Contract Duration: 1,679 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 15
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCT THE BLATCHFORD-PRESTON COMPLEX PHASE 2
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $37.3 million to RDE JV for work described as: CONSTRUCT THE BLATCHFORD-PRESTON COMPLEX PHASE 2 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to RDE JV for construction services. 2. Project involves commercial and institutional building construction. 3. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs. 4. Duration of the contract was 1679 days. 5. Awarded under Full and Open Competition. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized. 7. The contract was a Definitive Contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $37.3 million for the Blatchford-Preston Complex Phase 2 construction project appears to be within a reasonable range for a large-scale construction undertaking of this nature. Benchmarking against similar large-scale military construction projects would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed price contract structure suggests that cost overruns were intended to be borne by the contractor, which can be a positive indicator for cost control if managed effectively.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 15 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and can result in more favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this construction project likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome for taxpayers, as contractors vied to offer their best pricing to secure the award.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and its personnel who will utilize the completed Blatchford-Preston Complex. The project delivers essential construction services for institutional and commercial facilities. The geographic impact is localized to the site of the Blatchford-Preston Complex. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction labor and related trades during the contract period.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in large construction projects, though mitigated by firm fixed price.
- Ensuring contractor quality meets stringent military construction standards.
- Managing the long duration of the contract (1679 days) effectively.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition with a significant number of bidders.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
- The contractor, RDE JV, was selected through a competitive process.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this sector often supports infrastructure development, military facilities, and government operational needs. The market size for federal construction is substantial, with numerous firms capable of undertaking large-scale projects. This contract represents a specific investment in facility modernization or expansion for the Department of Defense.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity or joint venture, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific award mechanism is not evident. Further analysis of subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the indirect impact on small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this construction contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) and the relevant Army Corps of Engineers district. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price contract, with penalties or incentives potentially tied to performance and completion. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may be internal.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction
- Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) related construction
- Department of Defense Facilities Management
- General Building Construction
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may indicate project complexity or potential for delays.
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting data requires further investigation.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, large-contract, multi-year-project
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $37.3 million to RDE JV. CONSTRUCT THE BLATCHFORD-PRESTON COMPLEX PHASE 2
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RDE JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $37.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-12-16. End: 2015-07-22.
What is the track record of RDE JV in performing similar large-scale construction contracts for the Department of Defense?
Information regarding the specific track record of 'RDE JV' in performing similar large-scale construction contracts for the Department of Defense is not directly available in the provided data snippet. To assess their capabilities and past performance, a review of their contract history, past performance evaluations, and any debriefings from previous solicitations would be necessary. This would include examining their experience with projects of comparable size, complexity, and type (e.g., institutional or commercial building construction), as well as their adherence to schedules and budgets on prior DoD contracts. Without this detailed historical data, it is difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and expertise for this specific project.
How does the final cost of $37.3 million compare to the initial estimated cost for the Blatchford-Preston Complex Phase 2?
The provided data indicates the total award amount for the Blatchford-Preston Complex Phase 2 construction was $37,334,849.64. However, this snippet does not include information about the initial estimated cost for the project. To compare the final cost to the estimate, we would need access to the original budget or cost projections made by the Department of the Army prior to the solicitation. If the award amount is significantly higher than the initial estimate, it could suggest issues with the bidding process, unforeseen project complexities, or an underestimation of costs. Conversely, if the award is close to or below the estimate, it might indicate effective cost management during the acquisition phase.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate bids during the full and open competition for this contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used during the evaluation of bids for this contract. Typically, for construction contracts awarded under full and open competition, evaluation criteria often include factors such as technical approach, past performance, management capability, and price. The relative importance of these factors would be detailed in the solicitation documents. For a firm fixed price contract, price is usually a significant factor, but technical qualifications and past performance are also crucial to ensure the project is completed successfully and to the required standards. A thorough review of the original Request for Proposal (RFP) would be needed to identify the specific KPIs and their weighting.
Are there any known risks associated with the Blatchford-Preston Complex Phase 2 project, such as environmental concerns or site-specific challenges?
The provided data does not contain specific information regarding known risks associated with the Blatchford-Preston Complex Phase 2 project, such as environmental concerns or site-specific challenges. Large construction projects, especially those involving complex facilities, can carry inherent risks related to ground conditions, hazardous materials, historical site usage, or environmental impact. To identify these risks, one would typically consult environmental impact statements, site surveys, geotechnical reports, and any pre-award risk assessments conducted by the Department of the Army. The absence of explicit risk flags in this summary does not preclude their existence; further due diligence would be required to uncover potential project-specific challenges.
How does the duration of 1679 days for this project compare to similar large-scale military construction projects?
The contract duration of 1679 days, approximately 4.6 years, for the Blatchford-Preston Complex Phase 2 construction is substantial. This duration is not uncommon for large-scale military construction projects, which often involve complex designs, extensive site preparation, multiple phases, and stringent quality control requirements. Comparing this duration to similar projects would require a benchmark analysis of other major military facility constructions awarded over the past decade. Factors such as the scope of work, geographical location, and specific facility type (e.g., barracks, training facilities, administrative buildings) would influence the typical project timeline. A duration of over four years suggests a project of significant scale and complexity.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912ER10R0005
Offers Received: 15
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 121 ALHAMBRA PLZ, STE 1604, CORAL GABLES, FL, 33134
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $37,334,850
Exercised Options: $37,334,850
Current Obligation: $37,334,850
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-12-16
Current End Date: 2015-07-22
Potential End Date: 2015-07-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-05-22
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)