DoD Army awards $34.2M for construction mobilization/demobilization under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,249,692 ($34.2M)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-29

End Date: 2014-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,279 days

Daily Burn Rate: $26.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION Key points: 1. Significant contract value for construction services. 2. Competition method was full and open, suggesting broad market engagement. 3. Risk appears moderate given fixed-price contract type. 4. Construction sector spending is substantial across government.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $34.2M for mobilization and demobilization is substantial. Benchmarking against similar construction contracts is difficult without specific scope details, but the duration suggests a significant project.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were utilized through a competitive process, aiming for cost-effectiveness in construction mobilization and demobilization services.

Public Impact

Supports military readiness through infrastructure preparation. Impacts the construction industry and associated labor. Ensures efficient use of resources for project startup and closeout.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific awardee information.
Potential for cost overruns if scope changes.
Contract duration may exceed initial estimates.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized.
Firm fixed price contract type.
Clear contract award date and period of performance.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the commercial and institutional building construction sector. Government spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure needs, base support, and facility upgrades, with significant annual outlays.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, suggesting internal oversight mechanisms are in place. However, the lack of specific awardee details limits immediate assessment of public accountability.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of specific awardee details.
Potential for scope creep impacting fixed price.
Contract duration is lengthy (1279 days).
No indication of small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-29. End: 2014-03-31.

What was the specific scope of work for mobilization and demobilization?

The specific scope of work for mobilization and demobilization is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, this involves preparing a site for construction activities, including setting up temporary facilities, utilities, and access, and then dismantling and removing these upon project completion. The exact requirements would depend on the nature of the construction project it supported.

What were the key factors driving the $34.2M cost?

The key factors driving the $34.2M cost likely include the scale and complexity of the construction project supported, the duration of the mobilization and demobilization phases, labor costs, equipment rental, material transport, and any specialized requirements for site preparation or restoration. The firm fixed-price nature suggests these were estimated upfront.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure value for money?

The full and open competition process is designed to ensure value for money by allowing multiple qualified contractors to bid, fostering price reductions and innovation. Without knowing the number of bids received or the final price relative to independent cost estimates, it's difficult to definitively assess effectiveness. However, the method itself is a strong indicator of an intent to achieve competitive pricing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912ER10R0062

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $34,277,133

Exercised Options: $34,249,692

Current Obligation: $34,249,692

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline