DoD Army Awards $19.8M for Aviation Hangar, Taxiways, and Runway to Undisclosed Foreign Awardees
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,737,877 ($19.7M)
Contractor: Foreign Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-05-05
End Date: 2011-07-16
Contract Duration: 437 days
Daily Burn Rate: $45.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: AVIATION HANGAR, TAXIWAYS, AND RUNWAY.
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.7 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: AVIATION HANGAR, TAXIWAYS, AND RUNWAY. Key points: 1. Significant investment in critical aviation infrastructure. 2. Competition details are obscured, raising transparency concerns. 3. Potential risks associated with undisclosed foreign awardees. 4. Construction sector spending, with specific focus on aviation facilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $19.8M for construction services appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar aviation infrastructure projects would be necessary to determine if this price is competitive, especially given the lack of transparency regarding awardees.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
While advertised as full and open competition, the award to undisclosed foreign entities makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of price discovery and whether the best value was truly obtained for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The substantial contract value suggests a significant taxpayer investment. The lack of clarity on awardees and potential foreign involvement warrants scrutiny to ensure efficient use of funds.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may not know who is performing critical infrastructure work. Lack of transparency could hide potential cost overruns or quality issues. National security implications of foreign entities working on DoD facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Undisclosed foreign awardees
- Lack of transparency in competition outcome
- Potential for unknown risks with foreign contractors
Positive Signals
- Awarded for essential aviation infrastructure
- Utilized a definitive contract type
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, specifically for aviation facilities. Spending benchmarks for similar projects would typically consider factors like project scope, location, and material costs.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the contract was not awarded to small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or if opportunities were missed.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is crucial given the undisclosed foreign awardees. The Department of Defense should ensure robust monitoring of performance, quality, and adherence to security protocols throughout the contract lifecycle.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of transparency regarding awardees
- Potential national security risks
- Uncertainty in cost-effectiveness due to undisclosed competition
- Limited visibility into contractor performance and background
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.7 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). AVIATION HANGAR, TAXIWAYS, AND RUNWAY.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-05-05. End: 2011-07-16.
What specific criteria were used to select the undisclosed foreign awardees, and how was their technical capability and reliability assessed?
The provided data does not detail the selection criteria for the undisclosed foreign awardees. A thorough review would require access to the source selection documentation, which should outline how technical capabilities, past performance, and reliability were evaluated to ensure the successful completion of the aviation hangar, taxiways, and runway project.
What are the potential security risks associated with awarding construction contracts for military aviation facilities to foreign entities without public disclosure?
Awarding contracts to undisclosed foreign entities for critical military infrastructure like aviation facilities presents potential security risks. These could include compromised sensitive information, introduction of vulnerabilities in the infrastructure, or reliance on foreign supply chains susceptible to external influence or disruption, impacting national security.
How does the firm fixed price contract type mitigate cost risks for the Department of the Army, given the potential complexities of international contracting?
A firm fixed price contract is intended to shift cost risk to the contractor. However, with undisclosed foreign awardees, the Army must ensure rigorous oversight to prevent scope creep or claims for equitable adjustments that could negate the benefits of the fixed price, especially if unforeseen issues arise due to the contractor's unfamiliarity with DoD standards or local conditions.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912ER09R0080
Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,001,178
Exercised Options: $19,737,877
Current Obligation: $19,737,877
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-05-05
Current End Date: 2011-07-16
Potential End Date: 2011-07-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-25
More Contracts from Foreign Awardees (undisclosed)
- Supply of Fuel to Various Locations in Afghanistan — $889.5M (Department of Defense)
- A-Temp ANP Award — $444.1M (Department of Defense)
- Supply of Fuel to Bagram AIR Field, Afghanistant — $289.5M (Department of Defense)
- Delivery of Fuel in Afghanistan — $237.0M (Department of Defense)
- Turbine Fuel for Forward Operating Base (FOB) Sharana — $204.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)