DoD's $20.77M KMOD ASP Security Upgrades Contract Awarded to DWC Building Construction Company

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,769,538 ($20.8M)

Contractor: DWC Building Construction Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-12-11

End Date: 2011-10-31

Contract Duration: 689 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: KMOD ASP SECURITY UPGRADRES

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.8 million to DWC BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: KMOD ASP SECURITY UPGRADRES Key points: 1. The contract awarded to DWC Building Construction Company for security upgrades represents a significant investment in facility modernization. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a robust market for these services and potential for competitive pricing. 3. The project duration of 689 days indicates a substantial undertaking, requiring careful management to stay within budget and scope. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, which can be beneficial for the government if managed effectively.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $20.77 million for security upgrades appears substantial. Without specific benchmarks for similar security upgrade projects of this scale and complexity, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the number of bids received (11) suggests a competitive environment that may have helped moderate pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified contractors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government compared to limited or sole-source procurements.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for taxpayer value, as it encourages a competitive bidding process that should theoretically result in the best possible price for the required services.

Public Impact

Enhanced security at a Department of the Army facility, potentially improving safety for personnel and assets. Investment in infrastructure that supports military operations and readiness. Potential for job creation within the construction sector due to the contract's value and duration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during the 689-day project.
Ensuring the security upgrades meet evolving threat landscapes and technological standards.
Contractor performance and quality of work over the extended duration.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Significant investment in critical security infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on government infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and defense spending priorities. Benchmarks for similar large-scale security upgrade projects are essential for a comprehensive value assessment.

Small Business Impact

While the contract was awarded under full and open competition, there is no specific indication of small business participation or set-asides in the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating oversight by a major defense agency. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bears the primary responsibility for cost control, but government oversight is still crucial to ensure quality and adherence to specifications.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep given the extended project duration.
Ensuring the technology implemented remains current and effective.
Adequate government oversight to ensure quality and compliance.
Risk of contractor performance issues over the 689-day period.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.8 million to DWC BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. KMOD ASP SECURITY UPGRADRES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DWC BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-12-11. End: 2011-10-31.

What is the specific scope of the KMOD ASP security upgrades, and how does it align with current security threats?

The provided data lacks specifics on the 'KMOD ASP' security upgrades. Understanding the exact nature of these upgrades (e.g., physical barriers, electronic surveillance, access control systems) is crucial to assess their relevance to current security threats and their long-term effectiveness. Without this detail, it's difficult to determine if the $20.77 million investment is strategically aligned with evolving security needs or if it addresses outdated requirements.

How does the per-square-foot cost of this construction project compare to similar government or commercial building security upgrades?

A precise per-square-foot cost comparison is not possible without knowing the total square footage of the facility undergoing upgrades and the specific scope of work. However, the total contract value of $20.77 million over 689 days suggests a significant investment. Analyzing the number of bids (11) indicates competitive interest, which may have helped control costs, but a true benchmark requires detailed project specifications and cost breakdowns.

What mechanisms are in place to ensure the long-term effectiveness and maintainability of the security upgrades post-completion?

The data does not detail post-completion oversight or maintenance provisions. While the firm-fixed-price contract covers the initial construction, long-term effectiveness relies on the quality of installation and the integration of new systems. The government will need robust inspection protocols during the project and potentially separate maintenance contracts or internal support plans to ensure the security upgrades remain functional and relevant over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912ER09R0072

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: MAHAMMED SOUD ALLIMAA BLDG, MANGAF

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, International Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,343,893

Exercised Options: $20,769,538

Current Obligation: $20,769,538

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline