DoD's $46M Industrial Building Construction Contract Awarded to Undisclosed Domestic Firms

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $46,114,154 ($46.1M)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-04-10

End Date: 2018-04-27

Contract Duration: 3,304 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BDE AND SOUTHPARK INFRAST.

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $46.1 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: BDE AND SOUTHPARK INFRAST. Key points: 1. Significant contract value of over $46 million for industrial building construction. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market access. 3. Contract duration spans nearly 9 years, indicating a long-term project. 4. The specific awardees are undisclosed, raising transparency concerns.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is substantial, but without knowing the specific services or the scope of work, it's difficult to benchmark against similar projects. The firm fixed-price structure aims to control costs, but the long duration could introduce risks.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. However, the undisclosed nature of the domestic awardees makes it challenging to assess the effectiveness of this competition in achieving the best possible price.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers by encouraging competitive bids. However, the lack of transparency regarding the specific awardees and the long contract duration may obscure the ultimate value for money.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may not fully understand which companies benefited from this significant federal investment. The long project timeline could impact the relevance and modernity of the constructed facilities by completion. Lack of specific details on the construction projects limits public understanding of how funds were utilized.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Undisclosed awardees
Long contract duration (9 years)
Lack of specific project details

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized
Firm fixed-price contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Industrial Building Construction, a sector critical for national infrastructure and defense readiness. Spending benchmarks for such large-scale construction projects vary widely based on location, scope, and materials, but a nearly decade-long firm fixed-price contract suggests a significant, potentially complex undertaking.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the contract was awarded to domestic awardees, but it does not specify if small businesses were involved or subcontracted. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the impact on small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'full and open competition' method suggests a structured procurement process. However, the lack of disclosed awardees and specific project details hinders effective public oversight and accountability for this substantial federal expenditure.

Related Government Programs

Industrial Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of transparency regarding awardees
Extended contract duration increases risk
Vague description of services/products
Potential for undisclosed subcontractors
Difficulty in assessing value for money

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $46.1 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). BDE AND SOUTHPARK INFRAST.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $46.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-04-10. End: 2018-04-27.

What specific industrial facilities were constructed or improved under this contract, and how do their functionalities align with current Department of Defense needs?

The provided data lacks specifics on the industrial facilities constructed or improved. Understanding the exact nature of these facilities is crucial to assess their current relevance and alignment with the Department of Defense's evolving operational requirements. Without this context, it's difficult to determine if the $46 million investment continues to serve its intended strategic purpose effectively.

Given the nearly 9-year duration, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost overruns or scope creep, despite the firm fixed-price structure?

While a firm fixed-price contract aims to cap costs, a duration of over 3300 days presents inherent risks. Effective contract management would require robust oversight, clear change order processes, and potentially contingency planning for unforeseen issues like material price fluctuations or regulatory changes. The absence of specific details on these management strategies leaves the risk of indirect cost increases or scope creep unquantified.

How did the undisclosed domestic awardees perform, and what was the final value delivered relative to the initial $46 million obligation?

The data does not provide performance metrics or the final disbursed amount for the contract. Assessing the true value delivered requires knowing the quality of work, adherence to schedule, and the final expenditure compared to the obligated $46.1 million. Without performance reviews or final cost data, it's impossible to determine if the contract represented good value for the taxpayer.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912ER09R0017

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $46,114,154

Exercised Options: $46,114,154

Current Obligation: $46,114,154

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline