Dod Awards $16M for Airfield Design and Construction to Emta Insaat Taahhut VE Ticaret Anonim Sirketi
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,086,644 ($16.1M)
Contractor: Emta Insaat Taahhut VE Ticaret Anonim Sirketi
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-12-12
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,023 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIR FIELDS
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.1 million to EMTA INSAAT TAAHHUT VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI for work described as: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIR FIELDS Key points: 1. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army for airfield design and construction. 2. The awardee is EMTA INSAAT TAAHHUT VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI. 3. The contract value is $16,086,643.83. 4. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 5. The period of performance was from December 2007 to September 2010.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $16M for airfield design and construction appears to be within a reasonable range for projects of this nature, though specific benchmarks are difficult to ascertain without detailed project scope and location.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers likely benefited from competitive pricing due to the full and open competition method used for this contract.
Public Impact
Supports military readiness by improving airfield infrastructure. The project involved significant construction and design work, potentially creating jobs. The awardee's performance could impact future military construction projects. Long-term usability and maintenance of the airfields are key considerations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics.
- Potential for cost overruns in large construction projects.
- Geopolitical risks if the airfield is in a volatile region.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) helps manage costs.
- Experienced awardee in construction.
Sector Analysis
The Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector is a significant part of the economy. Defense spending on infrastructure like airfields represents a substantial portion of government construction contracts, often requiring specialized expertise and adherence to strict standards.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors on this specific award. Further investigation would be needed to determine any small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by the Department of the Army contracting office, ensuring adherence to contract terms and quality standards. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed project scope.
- Limited information on awardee's past performance.
- Potential for unforeseen construction challenges.
- Geographic location and associated risks are unknown.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.1 million to EMTA INSAAT TAAHHUT VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIR FIELDS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EMTA INSAAT TAAHHUT VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-12-12. End: 2010-09-30.
What was the specific scope of work for the airfield design and construction, and how did it compare to similar projects in terms of cost-effectiveness?
The provided data lacks specific details on the scope of work for the airfield design and construction. To assess cost-effectiveness, a comparison with similar airfield projects, considering factors like size, complexity, location, and specific features (e.g., runway length, pavement type, lighting systems), would be necessary. Benchmarking against industry standards for airfield construction would also provide valuable insights.
Were there any performance issues or disputes during the contract period, and how were they resolved?
The provided data does not contain information regarding performance issues or disputes during the contract period. A thorough review of contract performance reports, payment histories, and any associated documentation would be required to identify and assess any such challenges and their resolutions.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for the government in this specific contract?
The full and open competition process is designed to foster a competitive environment, theoretically leading to the best value. However, without access to the bids received, the evaluation criteria, and the final award decision rationale, it's difficult to definitively assess its effectiveness for this specific $16M contract. The presence of multiple bidders is a positive indicator.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912ER07R0025
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: ESKI GUVERCINLIK YOLU NO 113, ANKARA
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,086,644
Exercised Options: $16,086,644
Current Obligation: $16,086,644
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-12-12
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-07-25
More Contracts from Emta Insaat Taahhut VE Ticaret Anonim Sirketi
- Design-Build Services for Interim Embassy Compund in Tripoli Igf::ot::igf — $20.3M (Department of State)
- Construction of an ANP Ministry of Interior Regional Logistics Center and Regional Administration Building AT Beshud, Nangarhar, Afghanistan — $20.1M (Department of Defense)
View all Emta Insaat Taahhut VE Ticaret Anonim Sirketi federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)