Army's $32M Sand Key Beach Erosion Project Awarded to Norfolk Dredging Company in 2011
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,037,286 ($32.0M)
Contractor: Norfolk Dredging Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-09-09
End Date: 2012-12-11
Contract Duration: 459 days
Daily Burn Rate: $69.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAND KEY 2011
Place of Performance
Location: CLEARWATER, PINELLAS County, FLORIDA, 33755
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.0 million to NORFOLK DREDGING COMPANY for work described as: BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAND KEY 2011 Key points: 1. The project aimed to address beach erosion in Pinellas County, Florida. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract was a firm-fixed-price definitive contract, providing cost certainty. 4. The project duration was 459 days, completed within the specified timeframe.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $32,037,285.80 for heavy civil engineering construction appears reasonable given the scope of a major beach erosion control project. Benchmarking against similar large-scale coastal restoration projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders likely participated. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of competitive bidding is expected to have resulted in a fair price, maximizing the value of taxpayer funds spent on coastal protection.
Public Impact
Protects coastal communities and infrastructure from storm damage. Restores natural beach habitats for wildlife. Enhances recreational opportunities for residents and tourists. Contributes to the local economy through tourism and property value preservation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen environmental conditions arise.
- Long-term effectiveness of sand replenishment may be impacted by future storm events.
Positive Signals
- Completed within the specified duration.
- Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost uncertainty.
- Awarded through full and open competition.
Sector Analysis
This project falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector, specifically focusing on coastal resilience. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on infrastructure needs and environmental concerns, with large-scale projects like this representing substantial investments.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the prime contractor is Norfolk Dredging Company. There is no specific information provided regarding small business participation in this contract, which warrants further investigation to ensure opportunities were made available.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army, as part of the Department of Defense, is responsible for overseeing this project. Standard procurement regulations and contract management practices would have been applied to ensure accountability and proper execution.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for environmental disruption during dredging.
- Long-term effectiveness dependent on natural forces.
- Need for ongoing maintenance and future funding.
- Lack of explicit small business participation data.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, fl, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.0 million to NORFOLK DREDGING COMPANY. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAND KEY 2011
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORFOLK DREDGING COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-09-09. End: 2012-12-11.
What was the specific methodology used for sand replenishment and what are the projected long-term maintenance needs?
The specific methodology for sand replenishment would detail the source of the sand, the volume placed, and the placement techniques. Long-term maintenance needs are crucial for beach projects, as natural processes like wave action and currents continuously erode replenished sand. Understanding these needs helps in budgeting for future upkeep and assessing the project's overall lifecycle cost-effectiveness.
Were there any environmental impact assessments conducted prior to the project, and what mitigation measures were implemented?
Environmental impact assessments are standard for large-scale construction projects, especially those involving coastal ecosystems. These assessments identify potential negative effects on marine life, water quality, and coastal habitats. Mitigation measures could include specific dredging techniques, timing restrictions to avoid sensitive species' breeding seasons, or post-project monitoring to ensure ecological recovery.
How does the cost per cubic yard of sand placed compare to industry benchmarks for similar beach nourishment projects?
Comparing the cost per cubic yard of sand placed against industry benchmarks is a key metric for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of beach nourishment projects. This comparison helps determine if the government received a competitive price for the materials and services. Factors like sand source accessibility, transport distance, and project scale significantly influence this cost.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912EP11B0002
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 110 CENTERVILLE TPKE N, CHESAPEAKE, VA, 23320
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $32,037,286
Exercised Options: $32,037,286
Current Obligation: $32,037,286
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-09-09
Current End Date: 2012-12-11
Potential End Date: 2012-12-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-03-28
More Contracts from Norfolk Dredging Company
- Post 45 Lower Harbor New&maintenance Dredging Charleston, SC — $130.7M (Department of Defense)
- Savannah Inner Harbor Dredging Reaches A&B Stations 70+000 to 103+000, and Kings Island Turning Basin Savannah, GA — $120.8M (Department of Defense)
- Norfolk Harbor 55FT Deepening — $87.4M (Department of Defense)
- Pinellas County Short Protection Project — $52.4M (Department of Defense)
- 200511!500967!96ce!w912ep!usa Engineer Dist Jacksonville !w912ep05c0029 !A!N! !N! ! !20050726!20060410!050989532!050989532!050989532!n!norfolk Dredging Company !110 Centerville Tpke N !chesapeake !va!23320!99103!103!12!pinellas !pinellas !florida !+000029844000!n!n!000029844000!y300!restoration Activities !C2 !construction !000 !* !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!002!a! !D!N!C! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!y! !N! ! ! !W912EP!0001! ! — $49.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)