The Outfit Inc. awarded $20.6M for facilities support, with 1,770 days of service
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,613,961 ($20.6M)
Contractor: THE Outfit Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-07-26
End Date: 2026-05-31
Contract Duration: 1,770 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: DATABASE SUSTAINMENT SPECIALIST -BASE YR
Place of Performance
Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78237
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.6 million to THE OUTFIT INC. for work described as: DATABASE SUSTAINMENT SPECIALIST -BASE YR Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the long duration and fixed-price nature. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. Contract duration of nearly 5 years presents some performance risk. 4. Facilities support services are critical for operational readiness. 5. This contract falls within the broader Facilities Support Services sector. 6. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $20.6 million over approximately 1770 days equates to roughly $11,646 per day. Benchmarking this against similar facilities support contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has assumed the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if performance is met. The duration of the contract also implies a significant scope of work.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This typically suggests a robust bidding process. While the number of bidders is not specified, this method of procurement generally fosters price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids and potentially lower prices.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from sustained facilities support services. Services delivered likely include maintenance, repair, and operational support for facilities. The contract has a geographic impact in Texas (TX). Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for facilities management personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (1770 days) could lead to potential scope creep or evolving requirements not fully captured in the initial pricing.
- Fixed-price contracts can sometimes incentivize contractors to cut corners on quality if not adequately monitored.
- Reliance on a single contractor for an extended period may reduce flexibility in adapting to new technologies or service needs.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
- The contract has a defined end date, allowing for future re-competition or reassessment of needs.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This contract likely falls under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific services rendered, but the scale of this award suggests a significant operational support requirement for a substantial facility or set of facilities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated by a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, The Outfit Inc., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would contribute to the broader small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight mechanisms would typically involve contract officers, contracting specialists, and potentially technical monitors within the Department of the Army to ensure performance standards are met. Accountability is driven by the contract terms and conditions, including payment schedules tied to performance. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Maintenance and Repair
- Base Operations Support
- Logistics and Support Services
- Government Property Management
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to outdated requirements.
- Potential for performance degradation over extended period.
- Fixed-price contracts require careful initial pricing to ensure value.
Tags
facilities-support, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, texas, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, services, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.6 million to THE OUTFIT INC.. DATABASE SUSTAINMENT SPECIALIST -BASE YR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE OUTFIT INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-07-26. End: 2026-05-31.
What specific types of facilities support services are included under this contract?
The provided data classifies this contract under NAICS code 561210, Facilities Support Services. This broad category typically encompasses a range of services such as general maintenance, repair, custodial services, groundskeeping, pest control, and potentially security services for government facilities. Without access to the detailed contract statement of work (SOW), the precise services rendered cannot be definitively identified. However, the significant award value and duration suggest comprehensive support for one or more substantial facilities, likely crucial for the Department of the Army's operational readiness in Texas.
How does the daily cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support services?
The total award of $20.6 million over 1770 days results in an approximate daily rate of $11,646. Benchmarking this figure accurately requires detailed knowledge of the specific services provided, the geographic location's labor and material costs, and the scale of the facilities supported. General industry benchmarks for facilities management can vary widely. For instance, large-scale facility management contracts for complex organizations can range from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars per day, depending on the scope. Given the 'full and open competition' and 'firm fixed price' nature, this rate suggests a potentially competitive price, but a definitive assessment would necessitate a detailed comparison with similar government or commercial contracts with identical service scopes.
What is the track record of The Outfit Inc. in performing similar government contracts?
Information regarding the specific track record of 'The Outfit Inc.' in performing similar government contracts is not detailed in the provided data snippet. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), previous contract awards, and any documented issues or successes. Given this is a Department of the Army contract, it's likely that the agency conducted a thorough review of the contractor's past performance as part of the source selection process. However, without access to that specific performance history, it's impossible to definitively assess their reliability and capability for this particular requirement.
What are the potential risks associated with a contract of this duration (1770 days)?
A contract duration of 1770 days (approximately 4.8 years) presents several potential risks. Firstly, requirements and technologies can evolve significantly over such a long period, potentially making the contracted services or specifications outdated by the end of the term. This could lead to inefficiencies or the need for costly modifications. Secondly, long-term reliance on a single contractor may reduce the government's flexibility to adapt to changing needs or to incorporate innovative solutions from other providers. Thirdly, there's a risk of contractor performance degradation over time if oversight is not consistently rigorous. Finally, unforeseen economic fluctuations or changes in the contractor's business stability could impact service delivery.
How does the 'firm fixed price' contract type impact the government's financial exposure?
The 'firm fixed price' (FFP) contract type is generally advantageous for the government in terms of financial exposure because it establishes a ceiling price that is not subject to adjustment based on the contractor's cost experience. This provides a high degree of cost certainty. The contractor assumes the primary risk for any cost overruns incurred in performing the work. Conversely, if the contractor can perform the work for less than the fixed price, they realize a higher profit margin. This contract type incentivizes the contractor to control costs and improve efficiency. However, it is crucial that the initial price is set appropriately, reflecting a realistic estimate of the work required, as the government does not benefit from cost savings achieved by the contractor unless explicitly structured through incentives.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - PLATFORM
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912DY21R0051
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 517 LAKESIDE PASS, NEW BRAUNFELS, TX, 78130
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,166,626
Exercised Options: $20,613,961
Current Obligation: $20,613,961
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA18D00EL
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-07-26
Current End Date: 2026-05-31
Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-08-06
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)