Army awards $21.8M contract for remediation services in Waikoloa, Hawaii

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,794,524 ($21.8M)

Contractor: Hydrogeologic, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-08-31

End Date: 2025-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,856 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RD WAIKOLOA

Place of Performance

Location: WAIKOLOA, HAWAII County, HAWAII, 96738

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.8 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC. for work described as: RD WAIKOLOA Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in environmental cleanup. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Performance period spans over five years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The contract is for remediation services, a critical environmental function. 5. Geographic focus on Hawaii highlights regional environmental priorities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $21.8 million for remediation services appears reasonable given the five-year performance period. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental cleanup contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government, but the ultimate value depends on the effectiveness and efficiency of the remediation work performed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while competition was sought, certain sources may have been excluded for specific reasons. With two bidders, the level of competition is moderate, which could lead to a reasonably competitive price but may not be as robust as a fully open competition with numerous bidders. Further details on the exclusion criteria would clarify the extent of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A moderate level of competition suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price, though a broader competition might have yielded even greater cost savings.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and potentially the local environment in Waikoloa, Hawaii, through remediation efforts. Services delivered include environmental remediation, addressing contamination and restoring affected areas. The geographic impact is concentrated in Waikoloa, Hawaii, addressing specific site cleanup needs. Workforce implications may include employment for environmental scientists, engineers, and technicians involved in the remediation process.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen contamination is discovered.
Dependence on contractor's technical expertise for effective remediation.
Environmental risks associated with the remediation process itself.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Long-term performance period allows for thorough remediation.
Awarded by the Department of the Army, suggesting a critical need.

Sector Analysis

The remediation services sector is a vital part of the environmental services industry, focusing on cleaning up contaminated sites. This contract fits within the broader environmental consulting and remediation market, which is driven by regulatory compliance and historical industrial activity. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the scale and complexity of contamination sites.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and technical representatives within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified outcomes. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Department of Defense Contracts
Army Environmental Programs
HAWAII State Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price optimization.
Contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Scope of work complexity could lead to unforeseen costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.8 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC.. RD WAIKOLOA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-08-31. End: 2025-09-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for remediation services by the Department of the Army in Hawaii?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for remediation services by the Department of the Army in Hawaii requires access to comprehensive federal procurement data. While this specific contract is for $21.8 million over five years, understanding the broader trend involves looking at previous contracts for similar services in the region. Factors such as the number of sites requiring remediation, the types of contaminants, and the specific Army installations in Hawaii would influence this spending. Without a detailed historical analysis, it's difficult to determine if this $21.8 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment compared to past years. However, the presence of such a significant contract suggests a continued commitment to addressing environmental liabilities in the region.

How does the contractor, HydroGeoLogic, Inc., perform on similar environmental remediation contracts?

Assessing the performance of HydroGeoLogic, Inc. on similar environmental remediation contracts requires a review of their past performance evaluations and contract history. Federal agencies typically maintain performance records for contractors, which can include ratings on quality, timeliness, cost control, and overall customer satisfaction. A thorough analysis would involve examining contracts of comparable size, scope, and complexity awarded to HydroGeoLogic, Inc. by various government agencies. Positive performance indicators might include consistent high ratings, successful completion of projects within budget and schedule, and minimal disputes or contract modifications. Conversely, negative indicators could include low performance ratings, contract terminations, or significant cost overruns. This information is crucial for understanding the contractor's reliability and capability in executing the current Waikoloa remediation project.

What are the specific environmental risks associated with the Waikoloa remediation site that this contract addresses?

The specific environmental risks addressed by this contract in Waikoloa, Hawaii, are not detailed in the provided data. However, remediation contracts typically target risks stemming from historical activities such as military operations, industrial processes, or agricultural practices that may have led to soil, groundwater, or surface water contamination. Potential contaminants could include heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, solvents, or pesticides. The risks associated with these contaminants can range from direct human health impacts through exposure to ecological damage affecting local flora and fauna. The scope of work for this contract would define the precise contaminants of concern and the remediation technologies to be employed to mitigate these risks, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations and protecting public health and the environment.

What is the typical duration and cost range for similar large-scale environmental remediation projects managed by the Department of Defense?

Large-scale environmental remediation projects managed by the Department of Defense (DoD) can vary significantly in duration and cost, influenced by factors such as the size of the contaminated area, the type and concentration of contaminants, the chosen remediation technologies, and regulatory requirements. Durations often span several years, sometimes extending over a decade, to ensure thorough cleanup and long-term monitoring. Costs can range from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. For instance, major site cleanups at former military bases might involve extensive soil excavation, groundwater treatment systems, and long-term monitoring, driving up both time and expense. The $21.8 million contract for 1856 days (approximately 5 years) for the Waikoloa site appears to be within a moderate range for a significant, multi-year remediation effort, but direct comparisons require detailed project specifications.

How does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' procurement method impact price discovery and potential savings for taxpayers?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' procurement method aims to balance the benefits of open competition with specific needs that may necessitate excluding certain potential offerors. This method typically involves publicly soliciting offers but may exclude sources that do not meet specific, justifiable criteria (e.g., unique capabilities, national security concerns, or prior performance issues). While it allows for a broader range of bidders than a sole-source or limited competition, the exclusion of certain entities can potentially limit the number of competitive bids received. This reduced competition, compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition, might lead to less aggressive pricing. Therefore, while it seeks competitive pricing, the exclusion aspect could marginally reduce the potential for maximum price discovery and taxpayer savings compared to a scenario with no exclusions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912DY16R0077

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11107 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 400, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $34,022,826

Exercised Options: $21,794,524

Current Obligation: $21,794,524

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $359,974

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DY20D0017

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline