DoD Awards $37.7M for Mountain Home AFB Runway Repairs, Addressing Deteriorating Pavement

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $37,718,086 ($37.7M)

Contractor: Krsw Joint Venture

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-09-05

End Date: 2015-12-31

Contract Duration: 482 days

Daily Burn Rate: $78.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IMPROVEMENT TO MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE RUNWAY 12/30 AND TAXIWAY ALPHA DUE TO DETERIORATING PAVEMENT CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT EVALUATION. THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF REPAIRS TO RUNWAY 12/30 AND TAXIWAY A AND ITS CONNECTOR TAXIWAYS WITHIN THE VISUAL FLIGHT RULES HOLD LINES. REPAIRS WILL INCLUDE MILLING AND OVERLAY OF THE ASPHALT RUNWAY PAVEMENTS. RIGID PAVEMENT REPAIRS WILL VARY BY MINOR SPALL AND JOINT SEAL REPAIR TO FULL REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT. IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB, ELMORE County, IDAHO, 83648

State: Idaho Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $37.7 million to KRSW JOINT VENTURE for work described as: IMPROVEMENT TO MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE RUNWAY 12/30 AND TAXIWAY ALPHA DUE TO DETERIORATING PAVEMENT CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT EVALUATION. THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF REPAIRS TO RUNWAY 12/30 AND TAXIWAY A AND ITS CONNECTOR TAXIWAYS WITHIN THE VISUAL FLIGHT RU… Key points: 1. Significant investment in critical Air Force infrastructure to ensure operational readiness. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk of project delays or cost overruns exists due to complex pavement repairs. 4. Construction sector project with a focus on civil engineering and airfield maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $37.7 million contract value appears reasonable for a large-scale runway and taxiway repair project at a major Air Force base. Benchmarking against similar airfield construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders likely participated. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the most cost-effective solution for essential infrastructure upgrades.

Public Impact

Ensures continued safe operations and training capabilities at Mountain Home AFB. Addresses potential safety hazards and flight disruptions caused by pavement degradation. Supports the economic activity within the construction sector and related industries.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for unforeseen subsurface conditions impacting repair scope and cost.
  • Weather-related delays are common in airfield construction, especially in Idaho.
  • Coordination with ongoing base operations to minimize disruption.

Positive Signals

  • Clear identification of need based on pavement evaluation.
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type limits cost uncertainty for the government.
  • Full and open competition likely yielded competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

This project falls within the civil engineering and construction sector, specifically focusing on airfield infrastructure. Spending benchmarks for similar runway repair projects vary widely based on size, complexity, and location, but $37.7 million is a substantial investment for a single runway and associated taxiways.

Small Business Impact

While the prime contractor is KRSW JOINT VENTURE, the data does not specify if small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation in this project.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Army, acting for the DoD, managed this procurement. Oversight would typically involve contract administration, quality assurance inspections, and progress monitoring to ensure compliance with contract terms and specifications.

Related Government Programs

  • Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for unforeseen subsurface conditions.
  • Weather-related construction delays.
  • Coordination challenges with active base operations.
  • Complexity of repairs involving both asphalt and rigid pavements.

Tags

highway-street-and-bridge-construction, department-of-defense, id, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $37.7 million to KRSW JOINT VENTURE. IMPROVEMENT TO MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE RUNWAY 12/30 AND TAXIWAY ALPHA DUE TO DETERIORATING PAVEMENT CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED IN THE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT EVALUATION. THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF REPAIRS TO RUNWAY 12/30 AND TAXIWAY A AND ITS CONNECTOR TAXIWAYS WITHIN THE VISUAL FLIGHT RULES HOLD LINES. REPAIRS WILL INCLUDE MILLING AND OVERLAY OF THE ASPHALT RUNWAY PAVEMENTS. RIGID PAVEMENT REPAIRS WILL VARY BY MINOR SPALL AND JOINT SEAL REPAIR TO FULL REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT. IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KRSW JOINT VENTURE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $37.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-09-05. End: 2015-12-31.

What is the expected lifespan of the new runway and taxiway surfaces after these repairs?

The expected lifespan of the repaired runway and taxiway surfaces is not explicitly stated in the provided data. However, typical milling and overlay projects for asphalt pavements aim for a service life of 15-20 years, while full-depth rigid pavement repairs can last significantly longer. The effectiveness of the repairs in achieving optimal longevity will depend on the quality of materials used, the execution of the work, and ongoing maintenance.

What specific risks were identified in the Airfield Pavement Evaluation that necessitated this extensive repair?

The data mentions 'deteriorating pavement conditions' identified in the Airfield Pavement Evaluation as the reason for the repairs. Specific risks likely included increased risk of foreign object debris (FOD) due to spalling, potential for structural failure impacting aircraft safety, reduced operational efficiency due to surface irregularities, and increased maintenance costs if left unaddressed. The scope of repairs, from milling and overlay to full depth replacement, suggests a range of severity in the identified issues.

How does the cost of this project compare to other recent runway renovation projects at similar-sized military installations?

Without specific data on comparable projects, a direct cost comparison is difficult. However, $37.7 million for a runway and taxiway overhaul at a major installation like Mountain Home AFB is within the expected range for such significant infrastructure work. Factors like the extent of damage, specific repair methods required (milling vs. full depth replacement), and regional construction costs heavily influence the final price. A detailed benchmark analysis would require access to cost data for similar military airfield projects.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionHighway, Street, and Bridge ConstructionHighway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912DW14R0016

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5450 W GOWEN RD, BOISE, ID, 83709

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,218,086

Exercised Options: $37,718,086

Current Obligation: $37,718,086

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-09-05

Current End Date: 2015-12-31

Potential End Date: 2015-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-06-28

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending