DoD's $19.4M Howard A. Hanson Dam project awarded to Graham Malcolm JV under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,425,211 ($19.4M)
Contractor: Graham Malcolm JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-11-24
End Date: 2013-04-25
Contract Duration: 883 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION, CONSTRUCT WELLS/DRAINS; HOWARD A. HANSON DAM; RAVENSDALE, WA
Place of Performance
Location: RAVENSDALE, KING County, WASHINGTON, 98051
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.4 million to GRAHAM MALCOLM JV for work described as: RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION, CONSTRUCT WELLS/DRAINS; HOWARD A. HANSON DAM; RAVENSDALE, WA Key points: 1. Project focused on risk management and construction of wells/drains at Howard A. Hanson Dam. 2. Awarded to Graham Malcolm JV, indicating significant contractor experience in heavy civil engineering. 3. The contract was a firm-fixed-price definitive contract, aiming for cost certainty. 4. The project falls under 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $19.4M for heavy civil engineering construction appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar dam maintenance and construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring the government receives the best value and price for services rendered.
Public Impact
Ensures critical infrastructure resilience through dam maintenance and flood control improvements. Supports regional water management and flood protection for surrounding communities. Provides employment opportunities in the construction sector within Washington state.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific small business participation noted.
- Contract duration of 883 days may indicate complex scope or potential for delays.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- Project addresses critical infrastructure risk management.
Sector Analysis
This project falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, which is vital for maintaining and upgrading public infrastructure. Spending benchmarks for similar dam construction and repair projects can vary significantly based on scale and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this contract award (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the prime contractor is a large business.
Oversight & Accountability
The definitive contract award under full and open competition suggests a structured procurement process. Oversight would focus on project execution, adherence to timelines, and quality of construction to ensure taxpayer funds are used effectively.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- No small business participation noted.
- Long contract duration (883 days).
- Potential for scope creep in large civil engineering projects.
- Reliance on a single joint venture (Graham Malcolm JV).
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, wa, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.4 million to GRAHAM MALCOLM JV. RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION, CONSTRUCT WELLS/DRAINS; HOWARD A. HANSON DAM; RAVENSDALE, WA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GRAHAM MALCOLM JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-11-24. End: 2013-04-25.
What was the specific risk management strategy implemented for the Howard A. Hanson Dam, and how effective were the constructed wells and drains in mitigating identified risks?
The specific risk management strategy involved identifying potential failures or deficiencies in the dam's current infrastructure, particularly concerning water management. The construction of new wells and drainage systems aimed to alleviate hydrostatic pressure and improve overall dam stability. Effectiveness would be measured by post-construction monitoring of water levels, seepage, and structural integrity, comparing against pre-construction risk assessments.
How did the firm-fixed-price contract structure influence the final cost and potential for cost overruns compared to other contract types for similar civil engineering projects?
A firm-fixed-price contract shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing efficient project management and cost control. For this $19.4M project, it likely provided budget certainty for the Department of Defense. However, it could also lead to higher initial bids to account for contractor risk, potentially making it more expensive upfront than cost-reimbursement contracts if no significant unforeseen issues arise.
What was the competitive landscape for this 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' contract, and did the full and open competition result in demonstrably better value than a sole-source or l
The 'full and open competition' designation implies that numerous qualified contractors were solicited and allowed to bid. This broad solicitation typically fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. Demonstrating better value would involve comparing the awarded price and contract terms against what might have been achieved through less competitive methods, considering factors like technical proposals and past performance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912DW10B0012
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 9709 3RD AVE NE STE 300, SEATTLE, WA, 98115
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,425,211
Exercised Options: $19,425,211
Current Obligation: $19,425,211
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-11-24
Current End Date: 2013-04-25
Potential End Date: 2013-04-25 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-09-28
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)