Dutra Dredging Company awarded $22.9M contract for heavy civil engineering construction in New Jersey
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,899,090 ($22.9M)
Contractor: Dutra Dredging Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2013-07-24
End Date: 2013-12-12
Contract Duration: 141 days
Daily Burn Rate: $162.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CAPTURE FUNDING FOR CLIN 0002
Place of Performance
Location: MONMOUTH BEACH, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07750
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.9 million to DUTRA DREDGING COMPANY for work described as: CAPTURE FUNDING FOR CLIN 0002 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in civil engineering infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this project. 3. Contract type and fixed pricing offer some predictability in cost management. 4. Project duration of 141 days indicates a focused, short-term construction effort. 5. Geographic focus on New Jersey highlights regional infrastructure development needs. 6. The award to a single entity implies a specific capability requirement.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $22.9 million for heavy and civil engineering construction appears reasonable given the scope of such projects. Benchmarking against similar large-scale civil engineering contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the award suggests that the contractor assumed the primary risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if the price was competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited. With 3 bidders identified, this suggests a moderate level of competition. While not an extremely high number, it provides a basis for price comparison and suggests that the government received at least a few proposals to evaluate.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely the residents and businesses in New Jersey who will benefit from improved civil engineering infrastructure. The services delivered involve heavy and civil engineering construction, potentially including dredging, earthmoving, or related infrastructure development. The geographic impact is concentrated in New Jersey, addressing specific regional needs. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for skilled labor in the construction and engineering sectors within the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite fixed-price contract.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure work.
- Limited visibility into the specific technical challenges and solutions employed.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Clear definition of scope for heavy and civil engineering construction.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, a critical component of national infrastructure development. This sector encompasses a wide range of activities, from transportation projects to utility construction. The market size for federal civil engineering contracts is substantial, driven by ongoing needs for maintenance, upgrades, and new construction. This specific award likely addresses a particular project within this broader market.
Small Business Impact
The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a primary set-aside criterion (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the primary focus was on securing the necessary capabilities for heavy civil engineering construction, potentially favoring larger firms with specialized equipment and experience. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but they are not explicitly mandated by the contract's primary award structure.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and relevant program managers within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to deliverables. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project details and oversight reports may vary in accessibility.
Related Government Programs
- Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Projects
- Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs
- Federal Highway Administration Construction Contracts
- Department of Transportation Infrastructure Projects
Risk Flags
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting fixed-price contract.
- Geographic concentration of significant federal spending.
Tags
construction, heavy-civil-engineering, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, new-jersey, dredging, infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.9 million to DUTRA DREDGING COMPANY. CAPTURE FUNDING FOR CLIN 0002
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DUTRA DREDGING COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-07-24. End: 2013-12-12.
What specific type of heavy and civil engineering construction was performed under this contract?
While the contract is broadly categorized under 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction,' the specific nature of the work performed is not detailed in the provided data. Given the awardee, Dutra Dredging Company, it is highly probable that the contract involved dredging operations, port or waterway improvements, or other marine-related civil engineering tasks. Further investigation into the contract's statement of work or associated documentation would be required to ascertain the precise activities undertaken.
How does the awarded amount of $22.9 million compare to similar dredging or civil engineering projects in New Jersey?
Comparing the $22.9 million award to similar projects requires access to a database of comparable contracts. However, for large-scale civil engineering and dredging projects, this amount is within a typical range. For instance, major port expansions or significant waterway maintenance can easily run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. The specific value is contingent on the project's scope, duration, complexity, and the prevailing market rates for labor, materials, and equipment in the New Jersey region at the time of award (2013).
What were the key performance indicators or deliverables expected under this contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables for this contract. Typically, for heavy and civil engineering construction, deliverables would include completed construction phases, adherence to project timelines, quality of work meeting specified standards, and potentially environmental compliance reports. Performance would be assessed against the contract's statement of work, technical specifications, and schedule. The firm fixed-price nature implies that meeting these deliverables within budget is the contractor's primary responsibility.
What is Dutra Dredging Company's track record with the Department of Defense or similar federal agencies?
Dutra Dredging Company has a history of performing contracts with federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Army Corps of Engineers, often related to dredging and marine construction. Their track record generally indicates experience in large-scale civil engineering projects. A comprehensive review would involve examining past performance evaluations, any contract disputes or awards, and the volume and type of work previously completed for the government to assess their reliability and capability.
Were there any significant risks identified during the bidding or award process for this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly detail any significant risks identified during the bidding or award process. However, general risks associated with large civil engineering projects include unforeseen subsurface conditions, environmental challenges, weather delays, and potential cost escalations (though mitigated by the fixed-price nature). The fact that it was competed suggests that bidders assessed these risks and submitted proposals accordingly. The government's oversight would focus on monitoring these potential risks throughout the contract performance period.
How has federal spending on heavy and civil engineering construction evolved since this contract was awarded in 2013?
Federal spending on heavy and civil engineering construction has generally seen fluctuations influenced by economic conditions, infrastructure initiatives, and national priorities. Since 2013, there have been periods of increased investment, particularly with legislation like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) in 2021, which allocated substantial funds to infrastructure projects. Overall, spending in this sector remains a significant portion of the federal budget due to the continuous need for maintaining and upgrading the nation's infrastructure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912DS13B0015
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2350 KERNER BLVD STE 200, SAN RAFAEL, CA, 94901
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,899,090
Exercised Options: $22,899,090
Current Obligation: $22,899,090
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-07-24
Current End Date: 2013-12-12
Potential End Date: 2013-12-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-04-28
More Contracts from Dutra Dredging Company
- Fire Island Stabilization Fimi Contract 1 — $55.4M (Department of Defense)
- Actual Award - Drmcd, Reach 'D' — $22.0M (Department of Defense)
- West Coast Hopper Maintenance Dredging FY 2013 — $21.3M (Department of Defense)
- Dredging Thimble Shoal Federal Navigation Channel and the Cape Henry Federal Navigation Channel — $21.1M (Department of Defense)
- First 700,000 CY — $20.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)