DoD awards $6.7M engineering services contract for Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center at Fort Meade, MD

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,734,978 ($6.7M)

Contractor: Rtkl/Ssr

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-07-10

End Date: 2030-07-09

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: KIMBROUGH AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, FORT MEADE, MD

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.7 million to RTKL/SSR for work described as: KIMBROUGH AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, FORT MEADE, MD Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for engineering services, a critical component for facility maintenance and upgrades. 3. The duration of the contract is 5 years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. The fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. The awardee, RTKL/SSR, will provide services for the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center. 6. The contract is managed by the Department of the Army, part of the DoD. 7. The contract is located in Maryland, with specific focus on Fort Meade.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.7 million over five years for engineering services at a significant military medical facility appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering contracts for federal facilities suggests this pricing is within expected ranges, especially considering the specialized nature of military healthcare infrastructure. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost predictability, which is a positive indicator for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The open competition suggests the government sought the best value proposition from the market.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a robust bidding process and encourages contractors to offer competitive pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and military personnel who rely on the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center for healthcare services. The contract will ensure the continued operational readiness and potential modernization of critical medical infrastructure. Services will be delivered at Fort Meade, Maryland, impacting the local federal installation and its support services. The contract supports the engineering sector workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs for engineers and related professionals.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial engineering assessments are incomplete.
Dependence on contractor expertise for critical infrastructure decisions.
Risk of schedule delays impacting facility upgrades or maintenance timelines.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost overruns for the government.
Long-term contract duration allows for sustained focus on facility needs.
Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive selection process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which encompasses firms providing engineering consulting and design services. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services for infrastructure projects, facility maintenance, and specialized technical support. The market for federal engineering services is competitive, with many firms capable of undertaking large-scale projects. This specific contract supports a healthcare facility within a military installation, requiring specialized knowledge of government standards and operational needs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded via full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside provisions (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct analysis of small business set-aside impact. However, the prime contractor, RTKL/SSR, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would be a separate consideration for subcontracting plans and their impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting officers and technical representatives responsible for the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Healthcare Facility Maintenance
Department of Defense Engineering Contracts
Federal Engineering Services
Ambulatory Care Center Operations

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Risk of schedule delays impacting facility operations.
Contractor performance and technical capability assessment is crucial.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.7 million to RTKL/SSR. KIMBROUGH AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, FORT MEADE, MD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RTKL/SSR.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-07-10. End: 2030-07-09.

What is the track record of RTKL/SSR with the Department of Defense or similar federal agencies?

RTKL/SSR, as a contractor, likely has a history of performing services for government entities, including the Department of Defense. To assess their track record, one would typically review past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any reported issues on federal procurement databases. A detailed review would involve examining the types of projects they have completed, their performance ratings on those projects, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. For this specific contract, understanding their experience with healthcare facilities and military installations would be particularly relevant to gauge their suitability and potential risks.

How does the $6.7 million contract value compare to similar engineering services contracts for military medical facilities?

The $6.7 million contract value for five years of engineering services at the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Factors such as the size and complexity of the facility, the scope of engineering services required (e.g., HVAC, structural, electrical, plumbing, IT infrastructure), and the specific location's cost of living and labor rates influence pricing. Generally, large-scale medical facilities require extensive and specialized engineering support. A value of approximately $1.34 million per year for such a facility is likely within a reasonable range, but a precise comparison would require analyzing contracts for similar-sized ambulatory care centers or hospitals within military installations, considering the specific services rendered and the duration.

What are the primary risks associated with this engineering services contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential scope creep if the initial requirements are not clearly defined, leading to cost overruns or schedule delays. There's also a risk related to the contractor's technical expertise and ability to meet the specific demands of a healthcare environment within a military context. Schedule delays could impact the operational readiness of the facility. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management, clear statement of work, regular progress reviews, performance monitoring, and potentially incorporating incentives or penalties tied to performance and schedule adherence. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract also helps mitigate financial risks for the government.

How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money for this specific engineering service?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. For engineering services, FFP shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. This encourages the contractor to manage costs efficiently and accurately estimate their expenses upfront. For taxpayers, this means greater cost certainty, as the government knows the maximum price it will pay. However, if the scope is poorly defined or unforeseen issues arise, the contractor may be less willing to accommodate changes without significant price adjustments, potentially leading to disputes or less flexibility.

What is the historical spending pattern for engineering services at Fort Meade or similar military installations?

Historical spending on engineering services at Fort Meade and similar military installations typically reflects ongoing needs for facility maintenance, upgrades, and new construction. This includes routine maintenance, repairs, energy efficiency projects, and modernization efforts. Spending can fluctuate based on budget allocations, infrastructure condition assessments, and specific project requirements. Analyzing past contracts for engineering services at Fort Meade would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors frequently utilized. This data helps in understanding the consistent demand for such services and provides a baseline for evaluating current contract values and competition.

What are the implications of the 5-year duration for the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center's operational needs?

A 5-year contract duration for engineering services provides stability and continuity for the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center. It allows the selected contractor to develop a deep understanding of the facility's systems and specific needs, potentially leading to more efficient and proactive maintenance and support. This long-term engagement can foster a stronger working relationship between the government and the contractor, facilitating better planning for future upgrades and addressing long-term infrastructure challenges. For the facility, it ensures consistent engineering support, minimizing disruptions and supporting its primary mission of providing healthcare services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1717 PACIFIC AVE, DALLAS, TX, 75201

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,237,942

Exercised Options: $6,734,978

Current Obligation: $6,734,978

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DY20D0076

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline