DoD awards $11.18M contract for PFAS remediation at Stewart Air National Guard Base, NY

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,178,262 ($11.2M)

Contractor: Gsia-Parsons JV LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-29

End Date: 2030-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NTCRA FOR PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) IN GROUNDWATER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE OR THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER (ANGRC). THE NTCRA WILL BE CONDUCTED AT STEWART AIR NATIONAL GUARD (ANG) BASE LOCATED IN NEWBURGH, NEW YORK.

Place of Performance

Location: NEW WINDSOR, ORANGE County, NEW YORK, 12553

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.2 million to GSIA-PARSONS JV LLC for work described as: NTCRA FOR PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) IN GROUNDWATER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE OR THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER (ANGRC). THE NTCRA WILL BE CONDUCTED AT STEWART AIR NATIONAL GUARD (ANG) BASE LOCATED IN NEWBURGH, NEW YORK. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on environmental remediation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). 2. Work will be performed at Stewart Air National Guard Base in Newburgh, New York. 3. The contract has a firm-fixed-price structure, indicating defined costs for the services. 4. A long duration of five years suggests a complex and potentially extensive remediation effort. 5. The awardee is GSIA-PARSONS JV LLC, a joint venture. 6. This contract is not subject to small business set-asides. 7. The National Guard Bureau is the primary agency involved in this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11.18 million for a five-year PFAS remediation project appears to be within a reasonable range for environmental services of this nature. However, without specific details on the scope of work, the volume of contamination, or the specific remediation technologies to be employed, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar PFAS remediation contracts at other military installations would provide a clearer picture of cost-effectiveness. The firm-fixed-price structure offers cost certainty but may limit flexibility if unforeseen conditions arise.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. Sole-source awards are typically justified when only one vendor possesses the unique capabilities, specialized knowledge, or proprietary technology required for the specific task. The justification for this sole-source award needs to be thoroughly reviewed to ensure that competition was indeed not feasible and that the government obtained fair and reasonable pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the absence of competition limits price negotiation leverage. It is crucial to ensure that the awarded price is justified and reflects fair market value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force and the National Guard Bureau, ensuring environmental compliance and safety at Stewart Air National Guard Base. The services delivered will involve the assessment and remediation of groundwater and stormwater infrastructure contaminated with PFAS. The geographic impact is localized to Stewart Air National Guard Base in Newburgh, New York. This contract supports environmental protection efforts and potentially improves the local ecosystem by addressing hazardous substance contamination.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may result in a higher price than if the contract had been competed.
The long duration of the contract could present risks if remediation technologies become outdated or if unforeseen environmental challenges arise.
Reliance on a single contractor for a critical environmental service could pose a risk if the contractor experiences performance issues.

Positive Signals

The contract is awarded to a joint venture (GSIA-PARSONS JV LLC), suggesting a combination of expertise and resources for complex remediation tasks.
The firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract addresses a critical environmental issue (PFAS contamination) vital for military base operations and environmental stewardship.

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation sector, particularly concerning PFAS, is a growing area of focus for government agencies due to increasing regulatory scrutiny and public health concerns. This contract fits within the broader environmental services market, which includes hazardous waste management, site cleanup, and compliance consulting. The market for PFAS remediation is expanding rapidly, with significant investment expected from both public and private sectors. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar environmental remediation projects at federal facilities can vary widely based on the scale and complexity of the contamination.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The awardee is a joint venture, which may or may not include small business participation within its structure. Further investigation into the joint venture's composition and any subcontracting plans would be necessary to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army, which is procuring the services on behalf of the National Guard Bureau. Accountability measures will be embedded in the contract's performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency regarding the remediation process and outcomes will depend on reporting requirements stipulated in the contract and agency policies. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Hazardous Waste Management
Department of Defense Environmental Programs
Air National Guard Readiness Center Operations
PFAS Contamination Cleanup

Risk Flags

Sole-source award may limit price competition.
Long contract duration could introduce future risks.
PFAS remediation complexity and evolving regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.2 million to GSIA-PARSONS JV LLC. NTCRA FOR PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) IN GROUNDWATER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE OR THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER (ANGRC). THE NTCRA WILL BE CONDUCTED AT STEWART AIR NATIONAL GUARD (ANG) BASE LOCATED IN NEWBURGH, NEW YORK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GSIA-PARSONS JV LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-29. End: 2030-09-28.

What is the specific scope of work and the expected remediation technologies for this PFAS contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'NTCRA FOR PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) IN GROUNDWATER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE'. NTCRA typically stands for 'Non-Time Critical Removal Action'. This suggests the scope involves identifying, assessing, and removing or mitigating PFAS contamination in groundwater and stormwater systems at Stewart Air National Guard Base. Specific remediation technologies are not detailed in the summary data. However, common methods for PFAS remediation include granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration, ion exchange resins, reverse osmosis, and in-situ stabilization techniques. The chosen technologies will depend on factors such as the concentration of PFAS, the type of aquifer, the volume of water to be treated, and cost-effectiveness. A detailed work plan and technology selection report would typically be part of the contract's execution.

How does the $11.18 million contract value compare to other PFAS remediation efforts at federal facilities?

Benchmarking the $11.18 million contract value for PFAS remediation requires comparison with similar projects at other federal facilities, considering factors like the size of the affected area, the level of contamination, and the specific remediation technologies employed. PFAS remediation costs can vary significantly. For instance, studies and reports on EPA Superfund sites or other military base cleanups have shown costs ranging from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars for different phases of remediation or for different types of sites. A five-year duration for a firm-fixed-price contract at this value suggests a substantial, but not exceptionally large, undertaking. Without more granular data on the scope of work at Stewart ANG Base, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value appears to be within a plausible range for a multi-year environmental remediation project.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for environmental remediation services?

Sole-source awards for environmental remediation services carry several potential risks. Primarily, the lack of competition can lead to higher costs for the government, as the contractor faces less pressure to offer the most competitive pricing. This can result in a suboptimal value for taxpayer dollars. Additionally, sole-source procurements may limit the government's access to the full spectrum of innovative technologies or specialized expertise available in the market. If the chosen contractor underperforms or encounters unforeseen difficulties, the government has fewer immediate alternatives compared to a competitively awarded contract where multiple qualified bidders exist. Ensuring fair and reasonable pricing and thorough justification for the sole-source nature of the award are critical risk mitigation steps.

What is the track record of GSIA-PARSONS JV LLC in performing environmental remediation contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of GSIA-PARSONS JV LLC in performing environmental remediation contracts is not detailed in the provided data. As a joint venture, its performance history would likely be a composite of the individual entities comprising the venture. To assess their capabilities, one would typically review past performance evaluations, contract awards, and project portfolios of both GSIA and Parsons, and specifically any joint ventures they have previously formed. Key areas to examine would include their experience with PFAS remediation, their ability to manage complex environmental projects, their safety records, and their history of meeting project deadlines and budget constraints. A thorough review of their past performance is crucial for understanding their suitability for this critical environmental task.

How will the effectiveness of the PFAS remediation be measured and ensured over the contract's five-year duration?

The effectiveness of the PFAS remediation will be measured and ensured through a combination of contract requirements, performance monitoring, and regulatory compliance. The contract will likely stipulate specific performance metrics, such as target reduction levels for PFAS concentrations in groundwater and stormwater, and timelines for achieving these targets. Regular sampling and laboratory analysis will be essential to track the progress of the remediation efforts and verify their efficacy. The contractor will be required to submit regular progress reports detailing activities undertaken, monitoring results, and any challenges encountered. Government oversight personnel, potentially including environmental engineers and contracting officers' representatives, will review these reports and conduct site inspections to ensure compliance with the contract terms and environmental regulations. Independent verification or third-party audits may also be employed to validate the remediation outcomes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 17 CHURCH ST, FLEMINGTON, NJ, 08822

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,312,476

Exercised Options: $11,178,262

Current Obligation: $11,178,262

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline