Army awards $28.7M contract for Reece Road Access Control Point at Fort Meade, MD

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,682,046 ($28.7M)

Contractor: Tuckman-Barbee Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-08-25

End Date: 2025-10-07

Contract Duration: 1,869 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: REECE ROAD ACCESS CONTROL POINT, FT MEADE, MD

Place of Performance

Location: UPPER MARLBORO, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20774

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $28.7 million to TUCKMAN-BARBEE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: REECE ROAD ACCESS CONTROL POINT, FT MEADE, MD Key points: 1. The contract value of $28.7 million is significant for a single construction project. 2. Tuckman-Barbee Construction Co., Inc. secured the award through full and open competition. 3. The project's duration of 1869 days (over 5 years) suggests a complex undertaking. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a common area for federal spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $28.7 million appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature, especially considering the extended duration. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing as multiple qualified contractors can bid.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers, as it encourages lower bids and ensures the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

Fort Meade residents and personnel will benefit from improved access control and security. The project supports the local economy through construction jobs and material procurement. The extended timeline suggests potential for phased construction and minimal disruption.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (over 5 years) could lead to cost overruns or scope creep.
No small business participation noted, potentially missing opportunities for smaller firms.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which is a significant area of federal spending. Benchmarks for similar military infrastructure projects would be useful for a detailed comparison.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this contract award (ss: false, sb: false). This represents a missed opportunity to leverage the capabilities of small businesses in the construction sector.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's long duration and firm fixed price nature will require diligent oversight from the Department of the Army to ensure timely completion and adherence to specifications, mitigating potential risks.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration (over 5 years) increases risk of cost escalation and schedule delays.
Lack of small business participation may indicate a missed opportunity for economic inclusion.
Potential for scope creep given the extended timeline and complexity of infrastructure projects.
Firm fixed price contract places significant cost risk on the contractor, which could impact quality if not managed properly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $28.7 million to TUCKMAN-BARBEE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. REECE ROAD ACCESS CONTROL POINT, FT MEADE, MD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TUCKMAN-BARBEE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-08-25. End: 2025-10-07.

What is the specific scope of work for the Reece Road Access Control Point, and how does it justify the $28.7 million cost and 5-year duration?

The specific scope of work for the Reece Road Access Control Point is not detailed in the provided data. However, a $28.7 million cost and a 5-year duration suggest a comprehensive project involving significant infrastructure development, potentially including new gate structures, security systems, roadways, and supporting facilities. The extended timeline may accommodate complex construction phases, integration of advanced security technologies, and coordination with ongoing base operations at Fort Meade.

Given the firm fixed price contract, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost increases due to unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations over the 5-year period?

While a firm fixed price contract aims to provide cost certainty, managing unforeseen conditions over a 5-year period typically involves carefully defined contract clauses. These might include provisions for equitable adjustments for differing site conditions or force majeure events, though the contractor generally bears the risk of normal price fluctuations. Robust contract administration and change order management by the Department of the Army are crucial to control costs and ensure project success.

How will the effectiveness of the new access control point be measured, and what are the key performance indicators for this project?

The effectiveness of the new access control point will likely be measured by its ability to enhance security, streamline entry processes, and improve operational efficiency at Fort Meade. Key performance indicators (KPIs) could include reduced unauthorized access incidents, faster processing times for authorized personnel and vehicles, successful integration of security technologies (e.g., surveillance, identification systems), and overall compliance with Department of Defense security standards. Post-occupancy evaluations would assess these metrics.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912DR20B0002

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 16000 TRADE ZONE AVE, UPPER MARLBORO, MD, 20774

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,682,046

Exercised Options: $28,682,046

Current Obligation: $28,682,046

Actual Outlays: $1,071,568

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline