DOD awards $2.6M engineering services contract to Geo Consultants Corporation for 5-year project

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,596,085 ($2.6M)

Contractor: GEO Consultants Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-04-30

End Date: 2030-04-29

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RI/FS/PP/DD FOR USDA

Place of Performance

Location: BLADEN, WEBSTER County, NEBRASKA, 68928

State: Nebraska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $2.6 million to GEO CONSULTANTS CORPORATION for work described as: RI/FS/PP/DD FOR USDA Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a potentially limited but justified bidding process. 2. The firm fixed-price contract type indicates predictable costs for the government, mitigating cost overrun risks. 3. The contract duration of 1825 days (5 years) suggests a long-term need for these engineering services. 4. Awarded by the Department of the Army, this contract aligns with defense infrastructure and operational support requirements. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 points to specialized engineering services within the defense sector. 6. The absence of small business set-aside indicates the primary focus was on technical capability and best value, not specifically small business participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.6 million over five years averages to approximately $520,000 annually. Without specific benchmarks for similar engineering services contracts within the Department of Defense for projects of this scope and duration, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty. Further analysis would require comparing this rate to industry standards for comparable engineering support in similar geographic regions and for similar project complexities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded prior to the solicitation. The exact reasons for exclusion are not detailed but could be due to specific technical requirements, prior performance issues, or other justifications. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'limited' competition type suggests fewer than a truly open solicitation.

Taxpayer Impact: This procurement method, while potentially justified, may limit the range of innovative solutions and potentially lead to higher prices compared to a fully open competition with a broader bidder pool.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from specialized engineering services crucial for its operations and infrastructure. This contract supports the maintenance, design, or oversight of military facilities or projects. The services delivered are expected to enhance the operational readiness and effectiveness of Army assets. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the specific project sites managed by the Department of the Army, potentially within Nebraska where the contractor is based, or at various Army installations. The contract supports specialized engineering jobs, contributing to the technical workforce within the engineering services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition to reduce innovative solutions and increase costs.
Lack of transparency regarding the exclusion of sources could mask underlying issues.
Long contract duration may lead to scope creep or evolving requirements not fully captured in the initial pricing.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability for the government.
Awarded by a major federal agency (Department of Defense) indicates a need for critical services.
Contractor Geo Consultants Corporation is selected, implying they met the required technical and performance standards.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector is characterized by specialized expertise in areas like civil, mechanical, electrical, and environmental engineering. Federal spending in this area often supports infrastructure development, facility management, research and development, and operational support for various government agencies. The market size for federal engineering services is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense being significant consumers due to their vast infrastructure and complex operational needs.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that this was not a small business set-aside, and the 'st' field is 'NE' (Not Elsewhere specified) for small business status, suggesting no specific small business preference was applied. This means the competition was likely focused on technical capabilities and best value rather than prioritizing small business participation. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could be a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Department of the Army, likely through contracting officers and program managers responsible for ensuring performance and compliance. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS, where contract awards are recorded. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Engineering and Technical Services
Army Corps of Engineers Support Contracts
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Procurement
Infrastructure Support Services
Defense Facilities Engineering

Risk Flags

Limited competition due to exclusion of sources
Long contract duration increases risk of scope creep
Lack of detailed performance history for contractor
Potential for higher costs due to limited competition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $2.6 million to GEO CONSULTANTS CORPORATION. RI/FS/PP/DD FOR USDA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GEO CONSULTANTS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-30. End: 2030-04-29.

What is the track record of Geo Consultants Corporation with the federal government, particularly with the Department of Defense?

Information on Geo Consultants Corporation's specific track record with the federal government, especially the Department of Defense, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require reviewing past contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or claims. Understanding their past performance on similar engineering services contracts, their on-time delivery rates, and their ability to meet quality standards would provide crucial context for assessing the risk and value of this new award. Without this historical data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and expertise in fulfilling the requirements of this $2.6 million, five-year contract.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar engineering services?

The provided data does not include specific details on the scope of work or the exact engineering services to be rendered, making a direct comparison to market rates challenging. The contract value of $2.6 million over five years equates to an average annual value of $520,000. To benchmark this against market rates, one would need to identify comparable engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar project types, durations, and geographic locations. Factors such as the complexity of the engineering tasks, the required security clearances, and the specific technical expertise needed would influence market pricing. A thorough analysis would involve consulting industry cost data, bid analysis reports, and potentially seeking input from subject matter experts in the federal engineering services market.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?

Several risks are associated with this contract. Firstly, the procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests a potentially limited competitive landscape, which could lead to suboptimal pricing or fewer innovative solutions. The specific reasons for excluding sources are not provided, which could indicate underlying issues or specialized requirements that might pose challenges. Secondly, the long duration of five years (1825 days) increases the risk of scope creep, unforeseen technical challenges, or changes in government requirements that may not be adequately addressed by the firm fixed-price structure. Finally, without detailed performance history of Geo Consultants Corporation, there's an inherent risk related to contractor capability and reliability in delivering the required engineering services effectively and on time.

What is the expected effectiveness of the services provided under this contract?

The effectiveness of the services provided under this contract hinges on the specific engineering tasks to be performed, which are not detailed in the provided data. As a contract awarded by the Department of the Army for engineering services, it is expected to contribute to the agency's mission, likely involving infrastructure development, maintenance, design, or technical support for military operations. The effectiveness will be measured by the contractor's ability to meet the technical specifications, adhere to the schedule, and deliver high-quality engineering solutions. The firm fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to be efficient. However, the ultimate effectiveness will depend on the clarity of the SOW, the government's oversight, and the contractor's technical proficiency and commitment to quality.

How does this contract's value and duration compare to historical spending patterns for similar services?

The provided data indicates a $2.6 million contract over five years for engineering services. To compare this to historical spending patterns, one would need to analyze historical data for similar engineering services procured by the Department of the Army or the broader Department of Defense. This would involve looking at the average contract values, durations, and the number of bidders for contracts under NAICS code 541330. For instance, if historical data shows that similar projects typically range from $1 million to $5 million over 3-7 years, this contract would fall within that general spectrum. However, without access to historical databases and specific project details, it's difficult to ascertain if this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable trend in federal spending for these types of services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912DQ25R0002

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 325 KENTUCKY AVE., KEVIL, KY, 42053

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,142,908

Exercised Options: $2,596,085

Current Obligation: $2,596,085

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DQ25D3006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline