DoD's $19.9M Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility Contract Awarded to ACC Construction Co., Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,953,188 ($20.0M)

Contractor: ACC Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-06-03

End Date: 2019-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,068 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCT A TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (TEMF), FORT LEONARD WOOD, MISSOURI

Place of Performance

Location: FORT LEONARD WOOD, PULASKI County, MISSOURI, 65473

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.0 million to ACC CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCT A TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (TEMF), FORT LEONARD WOOD, MISSOURI Key points: 1. The contract awarded to ACC Construction Co., Inc. for the Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility (TEMF) at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, represents a significant investment in military infrastructure. 2. While the contract was awarded under full and open competition, the specific performance and cost-effectiveness require further analysis. 3. The duration of the contract (2068 days) suggests a substantial, long-term project with potential for cost escalation if not managed diligently. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a critical area for supporting military operations and readiness.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $19.9 million for a TEMF facility appears within a reasonable range for large-scale construction projects of this nature. However, without specific benchmarks for similar TEMF facilities or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a broad range of contractors to bid. This method is expected to yield a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive bidding environment.

Public Impact

Enhances military readiness by providing essential maintenance facilities for tactical equipment. Supports local economy through construction jobs and related services in Missouri. Potential for long-term operational cost savings through improved equipment maintenance capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contract duration is exceptionally long, increasing risk of cost overruns and scope creep.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess value for money.
No indication of small business participation, potentially missing opportunities for economic inclusion.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing process.
Construction of critical infrastructure for military equipment maintenance.

Sector Analysis

The Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector is vital for government infrastructure projects. Spending benchmarks for similar military maintenance facilities can vary widely based on size, complexity, and location, but $19.9 million suggests a substantial project.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not a specific focus or requirement for this contract, as it was awarded to ACC Construction Co., Inc. without explicit small business set-aside provisions. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this large, long-duration contract would be crucial to ensure adherence to scope, budget, and quality standards. The Department of the Army's contracting officers and potentially an Inspector General's office would be responsible for monitoring performance and expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration increases risk.
Potential for cost overruns.
Lack of detailed performance metrics.
No explicit small business participation noted.
Limited insight into specific facility capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.0 million to ACC CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. IGF::OT::IGF CONSTRUCT A TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (TEMF), FORT LEONARD WOOD, MISSOURI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ACC CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-06-03. End: 2019-01-31.

What specific features and capabilities does this TEMF facility include, and how do they align with current and future tactical equipment maintenance needs?

The provided data does not detail the specific features or capabilities of the TEMF facility. To assess alignment with current and future needs, a review of the original contract statement of work, architectural plans, and any subsequent modifications would be necessary. This would clarify the types of equipment it can service, the technological integrations, and its capacity to adapt to evolving military hardware.

Given the 2068-day duration, what risk mitigation strategies were implemented to control costs and prevent scope creep over the project's lifecycle?

The long duration of the contract (over 5 years) necessitates robust risk mitigation. Strategies likely included phased funding, detailed milestone-based payment schedules, strict change order controls, and regular performance reviews. However, the absence of specific details in the provided data means these strategies cannot be confirmed, and the risk of cost escalation and scope creep remains a concern without further oversight information.

How does the final cost of $19.9 million compare to the initial estimated cost or industry benchmarks for similar tactical equipment maintenance facilities?

The provided data does not include the initial estimated cost or specific industry benchmarks for comparison. While $19.9 million is a substantial figure for construction, its value for money can only be assessed by comparing it against similar projects' final costs, considering factors like facility size, complexity, location, and the specific requirements outlined in the contract's statement of work.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912DQ13B4000

Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 635 NW FRONTAGE RD, AUGUSTA, GA, 30907

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,953,188

Exercised Options: $19,953,188

Current Obligation: $19,953,188

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline