Army awards $29.2M for Camp Shaheen design and construction, highlighting construction sector activity

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,191,724 ($29.2M)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-05-17

End Date: 2012-11-06

Contract Duration: 539 days

Daily Burn Rate: $54.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN/CONSTRUCT CAMP SHAHEEN GROUP A

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: DESIGN/CONSTRUCT CAMP SHAHEEN GROUP A Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in infrastructure development. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding environment for similar projects. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and manage financial risk. 4. Project duration of 539 days indicates a substantial construction timeline. 5. The award falls within the broader context of military base infrastructure modernization.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $29.2 million for the design and construction of Camp Shaheen Group A is difficult to benchmark without specific details on the scope of work and location. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to establish a clear cost ceiling. Comparing this to similar military construction projects would require detailed analysis of project size, complexity, and geographic location. The absence of per-unit cost data makes a precise value-for-money assessment challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 6 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery, as it encourages contractors to offer competitive pricing to secure the award. The specific details of the bidding process and the number of proposals received would provide further insight into the intensity of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this contract likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source award. The multiple bids received suggest that the government obtained a fair market price for the construction services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army, which receives improved infrastructure at Camp Shaheen. The services delivered include the design and construction of facilities essential for military operations. The geographic impact is localized to the Camp Shaheen area, likely in Afghanistan given the project name. The project supports the construction workforce, potentially including both U.S. and local labor, depending on subcontracting practices.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of specific details on the scope of work makes it difficult to assess if the final cost aligns with the delivered value.
  • The undisclosed domestic awardees prevent a review of their past performance and potential conflicts of interest.
  • The project duration of 539 days could be subject to delays, potentially increasing overall costs if not managed effectively.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair bidding process.
  • The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
  • The project addresses critical infrastructure needs for military operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this sector often supports military installations, government facilities, and infrastructure projects. The market size for federal construction is substantial, with significant annual outlays. This specific award contributes to the overall spending within the defense construction sub-sector, which is influenced by geopolitical factors and military readiness requirements.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the prime contract was awarded to a larger entity capable of handling the full scope of the project. The absence of small business participation data means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal for this specific award, though larger prime contractors may engage small businesses for specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army's contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, although specific performance details and cost breakdowns may not be fully disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

  • Military Construction, Army
  • Design-Build Contracts
  • Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Projects
  • Afghanistan Infrastructure Projects

Risk Flags

  • Lack of specific scope details
  • Undisclosed contractor identity
  • Potential for cost overruns despite fixed-price contract if risks are not managed
  • Geopolitical instability in the region could impact project timeline and execution

Tags

construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, infrastructure, military-construction, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, domestic-awardee

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). DESIGN/CONSTRUCT CAMP SHAHEEN GROUP A

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-05-17. End: 2012-11-06.

What specific facilities were included in the Camp Shaheen Group A design and construction project?

The provided data does not specify the exact facilities included in the Camp Shaheen Group A design and construction project. Typically, such projects for military bases can encompass a range of structures, including barracks, administrative buildings, training facilities, maintenance shops, or support infrastructure. The 'Group A' designation might refer to a specific phase or set of buildings within a larger Camp Shaheen development plan. Further details would be available in the contract's statement of work or associated project documentation, which are not included in the abbreviated data.

How does the $29.2 million contract value compare to other similar military construction projects awarded by the Department of the Army?

Benchmarking the $29.2 million contract value requires comparing it to similar projects in terms of scope, complexity, and location. Without specific details on the type and size of facilities constructed, a direct comparison is challenging. However, for context, major military construction projects can range from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. Projects involving new base construction or significant upgrades often fall within this range. The firm fixed-price nature and the number of bidders (6) suggest a competitive environment that likely influenced the final price, aiming for value within the defense construction market.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for a construction project of this duration?

Firm fixed-price (FFP) contracts aim to transfer risk to the contractor, making them responsible for cost overruns. For a construction project lasting 539 days (approximately 1.5 years), potential risks include unforeseen site conditions, material price fluctuations, labor availability issues, and design changes. If these risks materialize and are not adequately managed by the contractor, they could lead to delays, quality compromises, or contractor default, even under an FFP. However, the FFP structure provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the contractor has accurately estimated costs and contingencies.

What was the historical spending pattern for Camp Shaheen infrastructure development prior to this award?

The provided data only includes information for this specific contract awarded on May 17, 2011. It does not offer historical spending patterns for Camp Shaheen infrastructure development. To understand historical spending, one would need to access contract databases and search for previous awards related to Camp Shaheen, potentially from the Department of Defense or Department of the Army, covering design, construction, maintenance, or other services. Analyzing such data would reveal trends in investment and the evolution of the base's infrastructure over time.

What is the track record of the contractor(s) awarded this $29.2 million contract?

The provided data indicates that the contract was awarded to 'DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED)' under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' with 6 bidders. This means the specific prime contractor's name and their track record are not publicly disclosed in this abbreviated dataset. To assess the contractor's track record, one would need to identify the awarded entity through more detailed contract award notices or databases and then research their past performance on similar government contracts, including project completion history, quality of work, and adherence to schedule and budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912DQ11R4018

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,362,124

Exercised Options: $29,191,724

Current Obligation: $29,191,724

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-05-17

Current End Date: 2012-11-06

Potential End Date: 2012-11-06 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-08-21

More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending