Army Awards $33.2M for Design/Construction of Military Police and Signal School

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,195,610 ($33.2M)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-04-08

End Date: 2012-11-15

Contract Duration: 587 days

Daily Burn Rate: $56.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, MILITARY POLICE AND SIGNAL SCHOOL

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $33.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, MILITARY POLICE AND SIGNAL SCHOOL Key points: 1. Contract awarded for construction of specialized military training facilities. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract value is moderate for a construction project of this nature. 4. No small business participation was reported, which could be a missed opportunity.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $33.2 million for design and construction appears within a reasonable range for a specialized military facility. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, as it allows all eligible contractors to bid. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received a fair price for the services rendered, minimizing potential overspending.

Public Impact

Enhances military training capabilities for police and signal operations. Supports the development of essential infrastructure for the armed forces. Potential for job creation within the construction sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of small business participation.
Potential for cost overruns in construction projects.
Dependence on specific contractor expertise.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition utilized.
Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) for cost control.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector for military infrastructure can fluctuate based on defense needs and modernization efforts.

Small Business Impact

The absence of small business participation is noted. Efforts to ensure small businesses have opportunities in future similar contracts could enhance economic impact and diversity.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating federal oversight. The firm fixed price structure provides a degree of cost accountability.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of small business participation.
Potential for construction delays.
Scope creep risk.
Unforeseen site conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $33.2 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, MILITARY POLICE AND SIGNAL SCHOOL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-04-08. End: 2012-11-15.

What specific design and construction elements were included in the $33.2 million award?

The award covered the design and construction of facilities for the Military Police and Signal School. Specific elements would typically include building structures, specialized training areas, utilities, and site preparation. Detailed project specifications would outline the exact scope, materials, and technical requirements to ensure the facilities meet the operational needs of the military branches involved.

Were there any identified risks during the contract performance period, and how were they mitigated?

Construction projects inherently carry risks such as unforeseen site conditions, material price fluctuations, and labor shortages. Mitigation strategies often involve detailed site surveys, contingency planning in the contract, robust project management, and clear communication channels between the government and the contractor to address issues promptly.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure value for taxpayer money in this specific contract?

Full and open competition generally promotes value by encouraging multiple bids, which drives down prices. For this $33.2 million contract, the process likely resulted in a competitive price. However, true effectiveness is best assessed by comparing the final cost against independent cost estimates and the performance outcomes achieved.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912DQ11R4014

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $33,195,610

Exercised Options: $33,195,610

Current Obligation: $33,195,610

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline