Army awards $22.5M for Fort Leonard Wood barracks construction to Wilson, S M & Co

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,465,589 ($22.5M)

Contractor: Wilson, S M & CO

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-08-30

End Date: 2011-11-04

Contract Duration: 1,161 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: PERM PARTY BARRACKS PH2

Place of Performance

Location: FORT LEONARD WOOD, PULASKI County, MISSOURI, 65473

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.5 million to WILSON, S M & CO for work described as: PERM PARTY BARRACKS PH2 Key points: 1. Construction project for barracks at Fort Leonard Wood. 2. Awarded to Wilson, S M & Co. for $22.47 million. 3. Full and open competition was utilized. 4. Project duration was 1161 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $22.47 million for barracks construction appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scale and duration. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best possible price for the required construction services.

Public Impact

Direct impact on military personnel housing at Fort Leonard Wood. Supports the Department of the Army's infrastructure development goals. Potential for local economic impact through construction jobs and material sourcing.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Long project duration (1161 days) could indicate potential for cost overruns or delays.
  • Lack of specific small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition utilized.
  • Firm fixed price contract type can provide cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Industrial Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is critical for maintaining and upgrading military infrastructure, with benchmarks varying significantly based on project scope, location, and specific requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the project scope inherently excluded small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating oversight by a major federal agency. The firm fixed price contract type offers some level of cost control, but monitoring project progress and adherence to specifications is crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Industrial Building Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration.
  • No indication of small business participation.
  • Potential for cost escalation in large construction projects.
  • Limited performance data available.

Tags

industrial-building-construction, department-of-defense, mo, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.5 million to WILSON, S M & CO. PERM PARTY BARRACKS PH2

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WILSON, S M & CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-08-30. End: 2011-11-04.

What was the final cost compared to the initial bid or estimated cost?

The provided data does not include information on the initial bid or estimated cost, making it impossible to directly compare the final award amount to projections. Understanding this variance is key to assessing cost efficiency and contractor performance throughout the project lifecycle.

Were there any significant delays or change orders during the contract period?

The contract duration was 1161 days, which is substantial. Without access to contract modification history or performance reports, it's difficult to ascertain if this duration was met as planned or if significant delays and associated change orders impacted the final cost and timeline.

How does the per-square-foot construction cost compare to similar barracks projects?

To assess the value for money, a per-square-foot cost comparison with similar barracks construction projects, accounting for regional cost differences and specific amenities, would be necessary. The current data lacks the detailed cost breakdown required for such a benchmark analysis.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionIndustrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912DQ08R0038

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2185 HAMPTON, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,465,589

Exercised Options: $22,465,589

Current Obligation: $22,465,589

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-08-30

Current End Date: 2011-11-04

Potential End Date: 2011-11-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-04-09

More Contracts from Wilson, S M & CO

View all Wilson, S M & CO federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending