DoD Awards $202.6M Performance-Based Logistics Contract to General Dynamics for Stryker Vehicle Support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $202,616,320 ($202.6M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-03-01
End Date: 2026-02-28
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $556.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: STRYKER WHOLESALE SUPPLY IS A PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS CONTRACT THAT ALLOWS THE CONTRACTOR TO WAREHOUSE, INVENTORY, AND PURCHASE MATERIAL BASED ON A STRYKER VEHICLE DENSITY.
Place of Performance
Location: STERLING HEIGHTS, MACOMB County, MICHIGAN, 48310
State: Michigan Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $202.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC. for work described as: STRYKER WHOLESALE SUPPLY IS A PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS CONTRACT THAT ALLOWS THE CONTRACTOR TO WAREHOUSE, INVENTORY, AND PURCHASE MATERIAL BASED ON A STRYKER VEHICLE DENSITY. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on warehousing, inventory, and material purchase for Stryker vehicles, indicating a need for efficient supply chain management. 2. General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition and potential price discovery limitations. 3. The performance-based nature suggests a focus on outcomes, but the specific metrics and their impact on cost-effectiveness require scrutiny. 4. The sector is military armored vehicle manufacturing, a critical but often high-cost area for defense spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. The award amount of $202.6M for a 364-day duration suggests a significant investment, and the lack of competition makes a direct pricing comparison difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition on this significant contract may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for logistics and material support services.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operational readiness of Stryker vehicle fleets through dedicated logistics support. Potential for increased costs due to sole-source award impacts overall defense budget allocation. Supports a critical component of the Army's ground vehicle modernization and sustainment efforts. The performance-based aspect could lead to improved efficiency and reduced downtime for vehicles.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type carries inherent risk of cost overruns.
- Lack of transparency in performance metrics and their impact on cost.
Positive Signals
- Performance-based contract aims for efficiency and outcome-driven results.
- Supports critical military hardware (Stryker vehicles).
- Contract duration aligns with anticipated operational needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting the manufacturing and maintenance of military armored vehicles. Spending in this area is often characterized by high unit costs, long procurement cycles, and significant reliance on a few prime contractors due to specialized requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated requirement for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that opportunities for small businesses in this specific logistics and supply chain segment may be limited.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure fair pricing and effective performance. Accountability will hinge on the government's ability to monitor the CPIF contract's cost drivers and the contractor's adherence to performance objectives.
Related Government Programs
- Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award.
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type.
- Potential for lack of price competition.
- Limited visibility into specific performance metrics.
- No explicit small business set-aside.
Tags
military-armored-vehicle-tank-and-tank-c, department-of-defense, mi, delivery-order, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $202.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.. STRYKER WHOLESALE SUPPLY IS A PERFORMANCE-BASED LOGISTICS CONTRACT THAT ALLOWS THE CONTRACTOR TO WAREHOUSE, INVENTORY, AND PURCHASE MATERIAL BASED ON A STRYKER VEHICLE DENSITY.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $202.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-03-01. End: 2026-02-28.
What specific performance metrics are included in this contract, and how are they tied to the incentive fee structure to ensure value for money?
The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics or the incentive fee structure. A thorough review would require access to the contract's statement of work and associated clauses. Understanding these elements is crucial to assessing whether the performance-based nature truly drives value and cost savings, or if it merely formalizes existing processes without tangible benefits.
Given the sole-source award, what steps has the Department of the Army taken to validate the necessity of this approach and ensure the pricing is fair and reasonable?
Without a competitive process, the Department of the Army must have conducted extensive market research and cost analysis to justify the sole-source award and establish a fair and reasonable price. This typically involves detailed cost breakdowns from the contractor, benchmarking against similar services, and potentially independent government cost estimates to mitigate the risks associated with a lack of competition.
How does this contract contribute to the overall readiness and modernization goals for the Stryker vehicle fleet, and what are the potential risks if these logistics are not effectively managed?
This contract is designed to ensure the operational readiness of Stryker vehicles by managing their supply chain, warehousing, and material procurement. Effective management reduces vehicle downtime and ensures parts availability. Risks of ineffective management include decreased combat readiness, increased maintenance costs, and potential delays in fielding upgrades or new capabilities, impacting the Army's strategic objectives.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing › Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 38500 MOUND RD, STERLING HEIGHTS, MI, 48310
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $202,616,320
Exercised Options: $202,616,320
Current Obligation: $202,616,320
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 13
Total Subaward Amount: $4,151,779
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W56HZV24D0031
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-03-01
Current End Date: 2026-02-28
Potential End Date: 2026-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-08-25
More Contracts from General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.
- Mobile Protected Firepower Engineering Manufacturing and Development / Middle Tier Acquisition — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- M1 Abrams Family of Vehicles — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Economic Order Quantity Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- System Tewchnical Support (sts)/System Sustainment Technical Support for the Abrams Tank Program — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200105!000201!1700!F9999 !marine Corps Systems Command !M6785401C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20010214!20060930!107153702!131266926!001381284!n!general Dynamics Amphibious SY!991 Annapolis WAY !woodbridge !va!22191!87312!153!51!woodbridge !prince William !virginia !+000023676102!n!n!000000000000!ac43!rdte/Tank - Automotive-Adv Tech DEV !a4a!combat Vehicles !2dbk!lvtp-7 !336992!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !D !n!r!1!001!n!1a!z!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
View all General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)