Vance AFB runway repair contract awarded to W. W. Clyde & Co. for $78M, with 3 bidders

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $78,075,458 ($78.1M)

Contractor: W. W. Clyde & CO.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-06-28

End Date: 2025-03-29

Contract Duration: 1,005 days

Daily Burn Rate: $77.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: VANCE AFB CENTER RUNWAY REPAIR

Place of Performance

Location: ENID, GARFIELD County, OKLAHOMA, 73703

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $78.1 million to W. W. CLYDE & CO. for work described as: VANCE AFB CENTER RUNWAY REPAIR Key points: 1. Contract value of $78M for runway repair at Vance AFB. 2. Competition involved 3 bidders, indicating a moderately competitive landscape. 3. The contract is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price, suggesting cost certainty. 4. Performance period spans from June 2022 to March 2025, over 1000 days. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 237310 for Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction. 6. The award was made by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. 7. The contract is not set aside for small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $78 million for runway repair appears reasonable given the scope and duration. While direct comparisons are difficult without specific project details, major infrastructure repairs for military installations often fall within this range. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government. Benchmarking against similar runway repair projects at other Air Force bases would provide further insight into value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with three bids received. The presence of multiple bidders suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this type of construction work. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing, though the specific pricing outcomes depend on market conditions and the complexity of the project.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer funds are likely being used efficiently by driving down costs through competitive bidding. This approach maximizes the opportunity to secure the best possible price for the required runway repairs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force personnel and operations at Vance AFB, ensuring continued flight readiness and safety. The contract delivers essential infrastructure repair services, specifically focusing on runway maintenance. The geographic impact is localized to Vance AFB in Oklahoma. The project will likely involve a workforce of construction laborers, engineers, and project managers, contributing to local employment in the construction sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen subsurface conditions are encountered, despite the fixed-price nature.
Risk of schedule delays due to weather or material availability, impacting operational readiness at the base.
Contractor performance history needs to be reviewed to ensure quality and timely completion.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process that should yield fair pricing.
The contract duration allows for phased work and potentially less disruption to base operations.
The contractor, W. W. Clyde & Co., has experience in heavy civil construction.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically focusing on heavy civil engineering and infrastructure repair. The market for large-scale civil construction, particularly for government and military facilities, is substantial. This project represents a significant investment in maintaining critical operational infrastructure for the Air Force, aligning with broader government spending on base modernization and readiness.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized services or materials.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant project management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to milestones. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed project-specific oversight reports may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Air Force Base Infrastructure Modernization Programs
Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Federal Highway and Transportation Construction Contracts
Military Airfield Pavement Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Risk of weather-related delays affecting project timeline.
Contractor performance history needs thorough vetting.
Dependence on specific materials and supply chain reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $78.1 million to W. W. CLYDE & CO.. VANCE AFB CENTER RUNWAY REPAIR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is W. W. CLYDE & CO..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $78.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-06-28. End: 2025-03-29.

What is the track record of W. W. Clyde & Co. on similar government contracts?

W. W. Clyde & Co. has a history of performing large-scale civil engineering and construction projects, including work for government entities. A review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving airfield construction or repair, would be necessary to fully assess their capabilities and reliability. This would involve examining past contract awards, completion records, and any reported performance issues or disputes. Their experience in highway, street, and bridge construction, as indicated by the NAICS code, suggests they possess the foundational expertise for runway repair, but specific airfield experience is a key factor for evaluating their suitability and potential risks.

How does the awarded price compare to similar runway repair projects?

Benchmarking the $78 million contract value against similar runway repair projects requires access to detailed cost data from comparable federal contracts. Factors such as the size of the runway, the extent of the damage, the specific repair methods required (e.g., resurfacing, crack sealing, full reconstruction), and the geographic location significantly influence project costs. Without specific comparable projects, it's challenging to definitively state if this price represents excellent or fair value. However, the firm fixed-price nature and the competitive bidding process suggest an effort to secure a reasonable price. Further analysis would involve comparing cost per square foot or cost per linear foot of runway repaired against similar projects.

What are the primary risks associated with this runway repair contract?

The primary risks associated with this runway repair contract include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen site conditions (e.g., subsurface issues, unexpected soil problems), schedule delays caused by adverse weather, material shortages, or labor issues, and performance risks related to the quality of the repair work. Given the critical nature of an operational runway, any delays or subpar work could impact Vance AFB's mission readiness. The firm fixed-price contract mitigates some cost risk for the government, but the contractor bears the risk of increased costs due to unforeseen circumstances. Effective project management, contingency planning, and robust quality assurance are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in managing costs for this project?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in managing costs for projects where the scope of work is well-defined and risks are manageable. For this runway repair project, the FFP structure shifts the primary cost risk to the contractor, W. W. Clyde & Co. This incentivizes the contractor to control costs and complete the work efficiently to maximize profit. The government benefits from cost certainty, as the final price is largely predetermined, barring any contract modifications. However, if significant unforeseen issues arise that necessitate changes to the scope, the FFP structure can lead to costly change orders, potentially negating some of the initial cost-saving benefits.

What is the historical spending trend for runway maintenance at Vance AFB or similar installations?

Analyzing historical spending trends for runway maintenance at Vance AFB or similar Air Force installations would provide valuable context for the current $78 million contract. This would involve examining past contracts for airfield pavement maintenance, repair, and reconstruction over several fiscal years. Understanding the frequency and cost of previous projects can reveal patterns of wear and tear, the typical lifecycle of runway components, and the average investment required for upkeep. Significant deviations from historical spending could indicate a need for more extensive repairs, changes in maintenance strategies, or potential shifts in pricing due to market conditions. Without this historical data, it's difficult to assess if the current expenditure is an anomaly or part of a consistent investment cycle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP

Solicitation ID: W912BV21R0008

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 869 N 1500 W, OREM, UT, 84057

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $78,075,458

Exercised Options: $78,075,458

Current Obligation: $78,075,458

Actual Outlays: $8,796,735

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline