DoD's $12.6M Vance Force Protection Contract Awarded to Mason & Hanger, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,568,775 ($12.6M)

Contractor: Mason & Hanger, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-28

End Date: 2009-04-06

Contract Duration: 921 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: XTLF063303, VANCE FORCE PROTECTION ENHANCEMENTS, VANCE AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA

Place of Performance

Location: ENID, GARFIELD County, OKLAHOMA, 73705

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.6 million to MASON & HANGER, INC. for work described as: XTLF063303, VANCE FORCE PROTECTION ENHANCEMENTS, VANCE AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA Key points: 1. Contract awarded under firm-fixed-price terms, indicating defined scope and cost. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 921 days implies a significant, multi-year project. 4. Awarded by the Department of the Army, a major component of the DoD. 5. Project focused on construction, specifically commercial and institutional buildings. 6. Base location in Oklahoma may have implications for local economic impact.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of approximately $12.6 million for force protection enhancements at Vance Air Force Base appears to be within a reasonable range for construction projects of this nature. However, without specific details on the scope of 'force protection enhancements,' a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. Benchmarking against other construction contracts for military bases of similar size and complexity would be necessary for a more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the final price reflects efficient execution.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With three bids received, the level of competition was moderate. While more than one bidder is present, a higher number of bids typically leads to more robust price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government. The specific details of the bidding process and the evaluation criteria used would further inform the assessment of the competition's effectiveness in securing the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to foster a competitive environment that can drive down costs and encourage innovation. A moderate number of bidders, as seen here, suggests that while there was some competition, there may have been opportunities for even greater cost savings with a larger pool of interested contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are the Department of Defense and specifically the personnel and assets at Vance Air Force Base, Oklahoma, through enhanced security measures. The services delivered involve construction and potentially the installation of security infrastructure and upgrades. The geographic impact is localized to Vance Air Force Base in Oklahoma. The contract likely supported construction jobs and related trades within the local or regional economy during its execution period.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the scope of 'force protection enhancements' was not precisely defined, despite the firm-fixed-price structure.
The moderate number of bidders (3) might suggest that the market for this specific type of construction service is not highly saturated, potentially limiting competitive pressure.
The contract was awarded in 2006, and its effectiveness and long-term value are subject to the evolving security needs of the base.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes fair pricing and access for a wide range of contractors.
The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost-overrun risk to the contractor, potentially protecting the government from unexpected expenses.
The project addresses critical force protection needs, contributing to the operational readiness and security of a military installation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. The market for military base construction and upgrades is substantial, driven by ongoing modernization efforts and security requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other construction contracts for similar security enhancements or infrastructure development at other Department of Defense facilities. The size of this contract, approximately $12.6 million, positions it as a mid-sized project within the federal construction landscape.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, Mason & Hanger, Inc. The absence of small business set-aside provisions means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may have been limited to indirect roles or through prime contractors who voluntarily engage them. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting plans were in place or if small businesses were involved in the supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be enforced through contract clauses, performance reviews, and payment schedules tied to milestones. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, which provide basic information on contract value, parties involved, and competition. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arose during the contract's lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Air Force Base Infrastructure Projects
Force Protection Measures
Federal Building Construction
Firm-Fixed-Price Contracts

Risk Flags

Moderate competition level may limit price discovery.
Scope definition for 'force protection enhancements' is critical for value assessment.
Long-term effectiveness depends on evolving security needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.6 million to MASON & HANGER, INC.. XTLF063303, VANCE FORCE PROTECTION ENHANCEMENTS, VANCE AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MASON & HANGER, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-28. End: 2009-04-06.

What specific 'force protection enhancements' were included in this contract, and how do they align with contemporary security standards?

The provided data does not detail the specific 'force protection enhancements.' These could range from physical security upgrades like barriers, improved lighting, and access control systems to technological enhancements such as surveillance equipment or communication systems. To assess alignment with contemporary standards, one would need to review the original contract statement of work (SOW) and compare the implemented solutions against current Department of Defense security directives and best practices for military installations. Without this detailed information, it's difficult to ascertain the full scope and relevance of the enhancements.

How did Mason & Hanger, Inc.'s past performance and pricing compare to other bidders in this full and open competition?

The provided data indicates that Mason & Hanger, Inc. was awarded the contract, and that there were three total bids. However, it does not offer details on the comparative past performance records or the specific pricing structures of the bidders. A thorough analysis would require accessing the source selection decision document (SSDD) or contract award justification, which would typically outline the evaluation criteria, the relative strengths and weaknesses of each proposal, and the rationale for selecting Mason & Hanger, Inc. This information is crucial for understanding if the award represented the best value considering both technical merit and cost.

What is the historical spending pattern for force protection enhancements at Vance Air Force Base, and how does this $12.6 million contract fit within that trend?

The provided data only includes information for this single contract award. To establish a historical spending pattern for force protection enhancements at Vance Air Force Base, one would need to query federal procurement databases for all contracts related to security and infrastructure upgrades at this specific installation over a relevant period (e.g., the last 10-20 years). Analyzing these historical data points would reveal trends in spending, the types of projects undertaken, and the average contract values. This $12.6 million contract, awarded in 2006, would then be assessed against these historical norms to determine if it was an outlier, a typical investment, or part of a larger modernization initiative.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how was Mason & Hanger, Inc.'s performance measured against them?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) established for this contract. Typically, for construction projects, KPIs might include adherence to schedule, quality of workmanship, safety compliance, and completion within budget (though the latter is less critical for firm-fixed-price contracts unless scope changes occur). Performance measurement would likely have been conducted through regular site inspections, progress reports, and formal acceptance testing by government representatives. The contract award itself suggests satisfactory performance, but specific metrics and evaluation outcomes are not available in this dataset.

Are there any known risks associated with Mason & Hanger, Inc. as a contractor, or with the nature of force protection construction projects?

The provided data does not highlight any specific risks associated with Mason & Hanger, Inc. or the nature of this project. However, general risks in force protection construction can include evolving threat assessments requiring design changes mid-project, unforeseen site conditions (e.g., environmental hazards, subsurface obstructions), potential delays due to weather or supply chain issues, and the complexities of integrating new security systems with existing base infrastructure. Contractor-specific risks would typically be identified through past performance reviews, financial health assessments, and any history of contract disputes or performance issues, none of which are detailed here.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912BV06R2023

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: DAY & Zimmermann Group Inc., the (UEI: 007913486)

Address: 7270 W 162ND ST, STILWELL, KS, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,568,775

Exercised Options: $12,568,775

Current Obligation: $12,568,775

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline