Dawson Enterprises awarded $28.8M for AFOS Support, a facilities services contract with a 2066-day duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,792,802 ($28.8M)

Contractor: Dawson Enterprises, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-08-02

End Date: 2025-03-29

Contract Duration: 2,066 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AFOS SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: FORT DIX, BURLINGTON County, NEW JERSEY, 08640

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $28.8 million to DAWSON ENTERPRISES, LLC for work described as: AFOS SUPPORT Key points: 1. The contract's firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs for the Department of the Army. 2. Competition was conducted under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a specific reason for excluding certain sources. 3. The contract duration of over 5 years suggests a need for sustained facilities support services. 4. The award value of $28.8 million over 2066 days averages approximately $13,936 per day. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to a focus on facilities support services. 6. The contract is a definitive contract, typically used for services or supplies over a period of time.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $28.8 million over approximately 5.6 years for facilities support services appears within a reasonable range for a large-scale government contract of this nature. Benchmarking against similar large facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm-fixed-price type suggests an effort to establish predictable costs, but without detailed service breakdowns and performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The average daily cost of approximately $13,936 needs to be evaluated against the scope and complexity of the facilities supported.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $13,936 per day, based on the total contract value and duration.

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This specific procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded for documented reasons. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated in the provided data, but the method suggests a potentially limited pool of eligible offerors compared to a standard full and open competition. This could impact the intensity of price competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even if justified, may limit the number of competitive bids received, potentially leading to higher prices for taxpayers than if all eligible sources could have participated.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from sustained facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. Services delivered likely include maintenance, repair, and management of facilities essential for military operations. The contract's performance location is New Jersey, impacting the local economy and workforce in that state. Workforce implications include potential job creation for skilled trades and support personnel in the New Jersey area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'Exclusion of Sources' in the competition method warrants further investigation to understand the rationale and potential impact on competition.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's performance and value delivery.
The long contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract is awarded to Dawson Enterprises, LLC, suggesting a known entity providing these services.
The contract is for facilities support services, a critical function for government operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This sector is crucial for government agencies to ensure their infrastructure is functional and safe. Comparable spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the size and type of facilities managed, but large-scale contracts like this are common within the Department of Defense for maintaining extensive operational bases and administrative buildings.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Dawson Enterprises, LLC, may still engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would be detailed in their subcontracting plan, if applicable and required for a contract of this size and type.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services at an agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports and specific oversight activities may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Base Operations Support Contracts
Government Facilities Management
Department of Defense Service Contracts
Commercial Facilities Services

Risk Flags

Potential for reduced competition due to source exclusion.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in public data.
Long contract duration may present management challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $28.8 million to DAWSON ENTERPRISES, LLC. AFOS SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAWSON ENTERPRISES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-08-02. End: 2025-03-29.

What is the specific nature of the 'Exclusion of Sources' in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award, and what impact did it have on the bidding process?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' procurement method indicates that the solicitation was open to all responsible sources, but specific sources were excluded from consideration for documented reasons. These reasons could range from past performance issues, failure to meet specific technical requirements in a prior solicitation, or other contractual or legal grounds. Without access to the specific solicitation documents and award justification, the precise nature of the exclusion remains unknown. However, such exclusions can limit the pool of potential bidders, potentially reducing the level of competition and possibly influencing the final price. If the excluded sources were significant competitors, the remaining bidders may have faced less pressure to offer the most competitive pricing.

How does the average daily cost of approximately $13,936 compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support services in New Jersey?

The average daily cost of approximately $13,936 for facilities support services needs to be contextualized by the specific scope of work, the types of facilities managed (e.g., administrative buildings, specialized operational sites), and the level of service required. Benchmarking this figure against industry standards for similar services in New Jersey requires detailed information on the contract's deliverables, such as square footage managed, types of maintenance performed (preventive, corrective), security services, landscaping, and other integrated facility management functions. General industry data for facilities management can range widely, from a few dollars per square foot per year to much higher figures for complex operations. A direct comparison would necessitate access to detailed service level agreements and cost breakdowns to determine if $13,936 per day represents excellent value, fair pricing, or an area of concern.

What is Dawson Enterprises, LLC's track record with the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for similar facilities support contracts?

Assessing Dawson Enterprises, LLC's track record is crucial for understanding their capability and reliability in fulfilling this $28.8 million contract. Information on their past performance with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies, particularly on contracts of similar size, scope, and duration, would provide insight into their performance history. This includes examining metrics such as on-time delivery, quality of services, adherence to budget, and any history of contract disputes or terminations. A review of federal procurement databases and contract award histories would reveal previous awards, contract values, and potentially performance evaluations, helping to gauge their suitability and the associated risk level for this current award.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract, and how are they monitored?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) for this AFOS Support contract. However, for a facilities support services contract of this magnitude and duration, robust KPIs and SLAs are essential for ensuring the government receives the required level of service. These typically include metrics related to response times for maintenance requests, uptime of critical systems, quality of repairs, energy efficiency targets, and customer satisfaction. Monitoring these KPIs and SLAs is usually conducted through regular performance reviews, site inspections, and reporting mechanisms mandated by the contract, overseen by the contracting officer's representative (COR).

How has federal spending on facilities support services, specifically within the Department of the Army, trended over the past five years?

Federal spending on facilities support services, particularly within the Department of the Army, has generally remained substantial due to the extensive infrastructure required to support military operations globally. Over the past five years, trends have likely been influenced by factors such as evolving military readiness requirements, infrastructure modernization initiatives, and budget allocations. While specific figures for the Army's facilities support spending would require detailed analysis of budget documents and contract databases, it's reasonable to assume a consistent demand for these services. Spending may fluctuate based on geopolitical events, base realignment and closure (BRAC) actions, and investments in energy efficiency or sustainability initiatives within federal facilities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912BU18R0017

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 900 FORT ST MALL STE 1850, HONOLULU, HI, 96813

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Native Hawaiian Organization Owned Firm, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,867,669

Exercised Options: $28,792,802

Current Obligation: $28,792,802

Actual Outlays: $2,494,043

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline