Boyd Jones Construction awarded $11.7M contract for commercial and institutional building construction by the Department of the Army

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,708,950 ($11.7M)

Contractor: Boyd Jones Construction CO

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-08

End Date: 2008-12-31

Contract Duration: 845 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BASIC LINE ITEM 0001, 0002, OPTION LINE ITEMS 0001, 0002, & 0003

Place of Performance

Location: OFFUTT AFB, SARPY County, NEBRASKA, 68113

State: Nebraska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.7 million to BOYD JONES CONSTRUCTION CO for work described as: BASIC LINE ITEM 0001, 0002, OPTION LINE ITEMS 0001, 0002, & 0003 Key points: 1. Contract value of $11.7 million for construction services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 845 days indicates a significant project timeline. 4. Fixed-price contract type may limit cost overruns for the government. 5. No small business set-aside noted, potentially impacting small business participation. 6. Geographic focus on Nebraska for this construction project.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $11.7 million for commercial and institutional building construction appears reasonable given the project duration of 845 days. Without specific details on the scope of work, it's challenging to benchmark against similar contracts. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the award suggests a degree of cost certainty for the government, which is a positive indicator of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 6 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this construction project. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition likely resulted in a more competitive bid, potentially saving taxpayer dollars compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from the construction of necessary facilities. The project supports the commercial and institutional building construction sector. The geographic impact is primarily within Nebraska, where the construction will take place. The construction project will likely create jobs for skilled labor in the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for all contingencies.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage project timelines effectively.
Limited visibility into the specific types of commercial and institutional buildings being constructed.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability.
Contractor has a track record with the Department of the Army (implied by award).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. This sector is vital for developing and maintaining infrastructure across various government agencies. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparing it to similar construction projects of comparable size and complexity, considering regional labor and material costs.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that small businesses may not have directly benefited from this specific award, although they could potentially be involved as subcontractors if the prime contractor chooses to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and relevant project managers within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project details might be limited.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Projects
Federal Building Construction
Department of Defense Facilities Management

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
Contractor performance risk related to schedule adherence.
Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.7 million to BOYD JONES CONSTRUCTION CO. BASIC LINE ITEM 0001, 0002, OPTION LINE ITEMS 0001, 0002, & 0003

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOYD JONES CONSTRUCTION CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-08. End: 2008-12-31.

What is the specific scope of work for this commercial and institutional building construction contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' (NAICS code 236220) awarded to Boyd Jones Construction Co. by the Department of the Army. However, the specific details of the scope of work, such as the type of buildings, their purpose, size, and location beyond the state of Nebraska, are not detailed in the provided data. Further investigation into the contract award documents or associated files would be necessary to ascertain the precise nature of the construction services required. This could range from new construction to renovation or expansion of existing facilities.

How does the $11.7 million contract value compare to similar construction projects awarded by the Department of the Army?

Benchmarking the $11.7 million contract value requires comparing it to similar construction projects undertaken by the Department of the Army or other federal agencies. Factors such as the type of construction (e.g., barracks, administrative buildings, training facilities), project complexity, geographic location (which influences labor and material costs), and contract duration (845 days) are crucial for a meaningful comparison. Without access to a database of comparable projects with detailed cost breakdowns, it is difficult to definitively state whether this contract represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, the full and open competition and firm fixed-price nature suggest an effort to secure competitive pricing.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for construction of this magnitude?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract, while offering cost certainty to the government, can introduce risks for the contractor. For a project of this magnitude ($11.7 million over 845 days), potential risks for the contractor include underestimating material costs, labor expenses, or unforeseen site conditions. If these risks materialize and are not adequately accounted for in the initial bid, the contractor may face reduced profit margins or even financial losses. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor might cut corners on quality or scope to maintain profitability if unforeseen issues arise, although contract oversight and quality assurance measures are designed to mitigate this.

What is the historical spending pattern for commercial and institutional building construction by the Department of the Army?

The provided data snippet focuses on a single contract award. To understand the historical spending patterns for commercial and institutional building construction by the Department of the Army, a broader analysis of historical contract data would be required. This would involve examining spending trends over several fiscal years, identifying major construction initiatives, and understanding the typical contract values and durations within this category. Such an analysis could reveal whether this $11.7 million award is typical, large, or small in the context of the Army's overall construction budget and priorities.

What are the implications of 'NE' (Not Elsewhere Specified) for the state and 'NE' for the country in the contract data?

The data indicates 'SN': 'NEBRASKA' and 'ST': 'NE'. This suggests that the contract's performance location is Nebraska. The 'NE' for the state likely refers to Nebraska, and the 'NE' for the country is unusual if it's meant to represent the United States. Typically, country codes are standard abbreviations (e.g., US). It's possible 'NE' in the country field is a data entry anomaly or a specific internal code. However, based on the state being Nebraska, the project is geographically situated within the United States.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W9128F06B0018

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4360 NICHOLAS ST, OMAHA, NE, 02

Business Categories: Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,708,950

Exercised Options: $11,708,950

Current Obligation: $11,708,950

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline