DoD awards $14.8M engineering services contract to Atkins-Black & Veatch-FSB JV for Eglin AFB
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,848,773 ($14.8M)
Contractor: Atkins - Black & Veatch - FSB JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-07-12
End Date: 2026-10-10
Contract Duration: 820 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: EMSO SUPERIORITY COMPLEX, EGLIN AFB
Place of Performance
Location: EGLIN AFB, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32542
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.8 million to ATKINS - BLACK & VEATCH - FSB JV for work described as: EMSO SUPERIORITY COMPLEX, EGLIN AFB Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for engineering services, a critical component of defense infrastructure. 3. Delivery order under a larger contract structure indicates potential for follow-on work. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government. 5. The duration of 820 days suggests a substantial scope of work. 6. Awarded by the Department of the Army, supporting military readiness and operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $14.8 million for engineering services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering contracts for military installations suggests this is within expected parameters. The firm fixed price structure helps control costs, but detailed cost breakdowns would be needed for a more precise value assessment. The number of bidders (3) indicates some level of competition, which generally supports fair pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with three bidders participating. This level of competition is generally positive as it allows multiple qualified firms to bid, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to more favorable pricing for the government. The presence of three bidders suggests a healthy market for these specialized engineering services.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through a competitive bidding process, ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the U.S. Air Force at Eglin AFB, receiving essential engineering support. Services delivered include engineering expertise crucial for infrastructure maintenance, upgrades, or new construction projects. The geographic impact is concentrated in Florida, specifically at Eglin Air Force Base. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for engineers, technicians, and support staff within the winning joint venture and potentially its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen complexities arise in engineering projects.
- Dependence on the performance and expertise of the joint venture to deliver quality engineering solutions.
- Risk of schedule delays impacting critical base operations or construction timelines.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost predictability.
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
- Joint venture structure may bring together diverse expertise for complex engineering challenges.
- Long-term contract duration allows for sustained support and project completion.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a vital part of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector supports numerous government functions, particularly in infrastructure development and maintenance for defense installations. The market for defense engineering services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for facility upgrades, new construction, and specialized technical support at military bases nationwide. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar engineering support contracts at large Air Force bases would typically range in the tens of millions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication of a small business set-aside for this contract, nor is there explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The joint venture structure, while potentially involving small businesses as partners, does not inherently guarantee small business participation. Further analysis of the subcontracting plan would be necessary to determine the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed price contract terms and performance requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific project details and performance metrics may be less publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction
- Base Operations Support
- Architectural and Engineering Services
- Defense Infrastructure Projects
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns
- Schedule delay risk
- Contractor performance variability
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, eglin-afb, florida, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, infrastructure-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.8 million to ATKINS - BLACK & VEATCH - FSB JV. EMSO SUPERIORITY COMPLEX, EGLIN AFB
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ATKINS - BLACK & VEATCH - FSB JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-07-12. End: 2026-10-10.
What is the track record of the Atkins - Black & Veatch - FSB JV as a combined entity or as individual firms on similar DoD contracts?
Assessing the track record of the Atkins - Black & Veatch - FSB JV requires examining the past performance of each entity within the joint venture. Atkins, Black & Veatch, and FSB (likely a component of a larger firm or a distinct entity) are established engineering and construction firms with significant experience in government contracting, including defense projects. Their individual histories likely include numerous successful contracts for infrastructure design, project management, and technical consulting for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. A review of their past performance evaluations, contract completion records, and any history of disputes or performance issues would provide a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability for this specific Eglin AFB contract.
How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or the bids of other competitors?
The awarded amount of $14.8 million represents the government's commitment to the Atkins - Black & Veatch - FSB JV for the specified engineering services. Without access to the pre-solicitation estimate or the bids submitted by the other two competitors, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the fact that the contract was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the winning bid was deemed the best value. If the awarded amount is significantly lower than the independent government estimate or the bids of other highly qualified firms, it could indicate strong price competition. Conversely, if it aligns closely with or exceeds the estimate, further scrutiny of the value proposition might be warranted.
What are the primary risks associated with this engineering services contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks for this engineering services contract include potential scope creep, unforeseen site conditions, contractor performance issues, and schedule delays. Scope creep can be mitigated through clear contract definition, robust change management processes, and strong government oversight. Unforeseen site conditions are a common risk in engineering projects; mitigation involves thorough site investigations during the planning phase and contingency planning within the contract. Contractor performance is managed through performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and the potential for withholding payment or exercising contract remedies if performance falters. Schedule delays can be addressed by setting realistic timelines, monitoring progress closely, and implementing liquidated damages clauses if applicable.
What is the expected effectiveness of the engineering services in supporting Eglin AFB's mission?
The effectiveness of these engineering services will be directly tied to their ability to support Eglin AFB's operational readiness and infrastructure development. High-quality engineering design, project management, and technical consulting are crucial for ensuring that facilities are safe, functional, and capable of meeting current and future mission requirements. Whether the contract supports new construction, upgrades to existing infrastructure, or specialized technical studies, its success will be measured by its contribution to the base's overall efficiency, security, and capacity. Positive performance evaluations and the successful completion of project milestones will be key indicators of effectiveness.
How does current spending on engineering services at Eglin AFB compare to historical patterns?
To assess historical spending patterns for engineering services at Eglin AFB, one would need to analyze contract data over several fiscal years. This would involve identifying all contracts awarded for similar services (e.g., architectural, engineering, construction management) to Eglin AFB and summing their values. Comparing the $14.8 million award to the average annual spending or the spending in previous years would reveal whether this represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment. Significant deviations from historical averages might warrant further investigation into the underlying reasons, such as new major projects, changes in infrastructure needs, or shifts in contracting strategies.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 7604 TECHNOLOGY WAY STE 400, DENVER, CO, 80237
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,338,803
Exercised Options: $15,338,803
Current Obligation: $14,848,773
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA890321D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-07-12
Current End Date: 2026-10-10
Potential End Date: 2027-01-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)