Army's $62.3M contract for program management services awarded to Quantum Performance Group Inc. shows a 6-year duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,222,347 ($14.2M)

Contractor: Quantum Performance Group Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-06-30

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,918 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200410!000967!2100!W9124Q!ACA, WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE !GS23F7100H !C!N! !N!W9124Q04F2084! !20040630!20050630!622829448!622829448!622829448!N!QUANTUM PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC!5050 RUSHMORE ROAD !PALMYRA !NY!14522!56187!117!36!PALMYRA !WAYNE !NEW YORK !+000000600000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!E!N! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!B!Y!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.2 million to QUANTUM PERFORMANCE GROUP INC for work described as: 200410!000967!2100!W9124Q!ACA, WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE !GS23F7100H !C!N! !N!W9124Q04F2084! !20040630!20050630!622829448!622829448!622829448!N!QUANTUM PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC!5050 RUSHMORE ROAD !PALMYRA !NY!14522!56187!117!36!PALMYRA !WAYN… Key points: 1. The contract's value of $62.3M over 6 years suggests a moderate annual spend for program management support. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract are not detailed, but the award type indicates it was competed. 3. The duration of the contract (1918 days) is substantial, potentially indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. Performance context is limited, but the service category points to general management and administrative support. 5. The contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. 6. The contract was awarded to a single entity, Quantum Performance Group Inc., suggesting a focus on specialized capabilities or a competitive bidding process that resulted in one awardee.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $62.3 million over approximately six years averages to about $10.4 million per year. Without specific benchmarks for similar program management support services at White Sands Missile Range or comparable Army installations, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the duration and total value suggest a significant investment. Further analysis would require comparing the scope of services and deliverables to other contracts of a similar nature.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bidders that participated in the competition. A full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offer. The fact that it was competed fully is a positive indicator for taxpayer value.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is intended to drive down costs through market forces, potentially leading to better value for taxpayers by ensuring a wide range of offers are considered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely the Department of the Army and its personnel at White Sands Missile Range, who receive program management and support services. The services delivered are categorized under 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services,' suggesting support for operational efficiency, planning, and execution of Army programs. The geographic impact is centered around White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, a key Army installation. Workforce implications may include the direct employment of personnel by Quantum Performance Group, Inc. to fulfill the contract requirements, as well as indirect support to Army personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The specific deliverables and performance metrics are not detailed, making it challenging to assess the quality and effectiveness of the services provided.
Without a breakdown of costs or labor categories, it's difficult to ascertain if the pricing is competitive for the services rendered.
The contract's long duration could pose a risk if requirements change significantly over time, potentially leading to inefficiencies or cost overruns if not managed proactively.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process that likely considered multiple qualified vendors.
The award to Quantum Performance Group, Inc. indicates the contractor met the government's requirements for program management and support services.
The substantial duration of the contract (over 5 years) suggests a stable, ongoing need for these services, implying a level of satisfaction or consistent requirement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically under the sub-sector of Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services. This sector is characterized by a wide range of specialized expertise offered to government and commercial clients. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611, 'Management Consulting Services,' represents a significant portion of federal spending on professional services, encompassing strategic planning, organizational improvement, and operational support. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparing it to other federal contracts for similar management consulting services, particularly those awarded to support large military installations or complex program management needs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically mandated for small businesses through a set-aside. The primary contractor, Quantum Performance Group, Inc., would have the discretion to subcontract, but there is no explicit requirement in the provided data to do so for small business participation. This means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the contracting agency, the Department of the Army, and potentially the relevant Inspector General's office. Mechanisms for oversight would include contract performance reviews, audits, and adherence to reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated by contract databases like FPDS, which provide basic award information. However, detailed oversight reports or specific accountability measures are not provided in this data snippet.

Related Government Programs

Program Management Support Services
Management and Consulting Services
Department of Defense Contracts
Army Installation Support Contracts
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of scope creep or obsolescence.
Limited public information on specific performance metrics and deliverables.
No explicit small business subcontracting requirements noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.2 million to QUANTUM PERFORMANCE GROUP INC. 200410!000967!2100!W9124Q!ACA, WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE !GS23F7100H !C!N! !N!W9124Q04F2084! !20040630!20050630!622829448!622829448!622829448!N!QUANTUM PERFORMANCE GROUP, INC!5050 RUSHMORE ROAD !PALMYRA !NY!14522!56187!117!36!PALMYRA !WAYNE !NEW YORK !+000000600000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is QUANTUM PERFORMANCE GROUP INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-06-30. End: 2009-09-30.

What is the track record of Quantum Performance Group, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Quantum Performance Group, Inc. has received federal contracts, including this significant award from the Department of the Army. To fully assess their track record, a deeper dive into their contract history would be necessary. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the types and values of contracts they have successfully managed. Understanding their experience with similar program management and consulting services, especially within a military context, is crucial for evaluating their capability and reliability. Without more detailed historical data, it's difficult to provide a comprehensive assessment of their past performance beyond the fact that they were awarded this contract.

How does the $62.3 million contract value compare to similar program management support services contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

The $62.3 million contract value for program management support services over approximately six years represents a substantial investment. To benchmark this value, we would need to compare it against similar contracts awarded by the Department of the Army or other branches of the DoD for comparable services at large installations or for complex programs. Factors such as the scope of work, duration, required expertise, and geographic location would need to be considered for a fair comparison. If similar contracts for similar services are valued significantly higher or lower, it could indicate whether this award represents a good or questionable value for money. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, a precise benchmark is not possible from the provided information.

What are the primary risks associated with a contract of this duration (over 5 years) for program management support?

Contracts with long durations, such as this one exceeding five years, carry several inherent risks. One primary risk is scope creep, where the requirements may expand beyond the original intent, leading to increased costs and potential delays if not managed effectively. Another risk is technological obsolescence; if the services involve technology, it may become outdated over the contract period. Furthermore, long-term contracts can lead to contractor complacency or a decrease in competitive pressure if not structured with appropriate performance incentives and review mechanisms. For the government, there's also the risk of locking into a solution that may not be optimal if market conditions or strategic priorities change. Effective contract management, including regular reviews and potential for re-competition or modification, is crucial to mitigate these risks.

What is the effectiveness of 'Full and Open Competition' in ensuring optimal pricing and quality for management consulting services?

Full and Open Competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring optimal pricing and quality for management consulting services. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, it fosters a competitive environment where contractors are incentivized to offer their best pricing and most innovative solutions to win the contract. This broad competition increases the likelihood that the government will receive a high-quality service at a fair and reasonable price. It also provides transparency and reduces the perception of favoritism. However, the effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the government's ability to properly assess the proposals received. In some niche areas, the number of capable bidders might be limited, even under full and open competition.

How has federal spending on 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) trended over the past decade?

Federal spending on 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) has generally shown an upward trend over the past decade, reflecting a consistent demand for these specialized services across various government agencies. This category includes strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, and general management advice. Factors contributing to this trend include the increasing complexity of government operations, the need for efficiency improvements, and the outsourcing of specialized expertise that may not be available in-house. While specific year-over-year fluctuations can occur due to budget cycles and shifting priorities, the overall trajectory indicates a sustained reliance on external consultants for management and administrative support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5050 RUSHMORE RD, PALMYRA, NY, 14522

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS23F7100H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline