DoD awards $27M contract for Provost Marshal Protection Services to Booz Allen Hamilton

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,989,165 ($27.0M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-03-25

End Date: 2025-03-03

Contract Duration: 1,074 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IMCOM PROVOST MARSHALL PROTECTION SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78234

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IMCOM PROVOST MARSHALL PROTECTION SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1074 days indicates a medium-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. The award was made to a single contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton. 5. The contract is for Engineering Services, with a primary NAICS code of 541330. 6. The contract is being performed in Texas.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $26.99 million contract is challenging without specific service details and performance metrics. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if the price is competitive. Comparing this to similar contracts for protection services within the Department of Defense would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The absence of detailed performance data makes a definitive assessment of value difficult at this stage.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The fact that it resulted in a single award to Booz Allen Hamilton does not inherently suggest a lack of competition, as multiple bids may have been received. However, further analysis would be needed to determine the number of bids submitted and the level of competition experienced.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military personnel and facilities requiring protection services. The services delivered are related to protection and security, supporting the Provost Marshal's mission. The geographic impact is concentrated in Texas, where the contract is being performed. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized security and engineering personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor effectiveness.
The specific nature of 'protection services' is broad and could encompass a wide range of activities.
Potential for scope creep if the contract is not tightly managed.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract type aligns incentives and transfers risk to the contractor.
Contract duration suggests a stable, ongoing requirement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to security and protection. The market for such services within the Department of Defense is substantial, driven by the need to secure personnel, facilities, and operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other contracts for security, protective services, and engineering support within federal agencies, particularly the military branches. The size of this contract, approximately $27 million, places it in the medium-to-large category for individual service contracts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill parts of the contract, depending on their own subcontracting plans and the nature of the services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's statement of work and performance standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Security Contracts
Provost Marshal General Services
Engineering Services for Military Installations
Base Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Ambiguity in the scope of 'protection services'.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IMCOM PROVOST MARSHALL PROTECTION SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-03-25. End: 2025-03-03.

What is the specific scope of 'Provost Marshall Protection Services' covered under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of 'Provost Marshall Protection Services.' This designation typically involves security operations, physical security measures, law enforcement support, and potentially protective details for personnel or assets under the purview of a Provost Marshal. The NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) suggests that the contract may involve the design, development, or implementation of security systems, infrastructure, or operational plans, rather than solely personnel-based security. Further details would be found in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS), which are not included in the provided data. Understanding the precise services is crucial for assessing performance and value.

How does the $26.99 million contract value compare to similar protection services contracts within the DoD?

Direct comparison of the $26.99 million contract value to similar DoD protection services contracts requires access to a broader dataset of historical awards, including their scope, duration, and performance metrics. Without this comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state whether this contract represents a high, low, or average value. However, contracts in the tens of millions of dollars for specialized services like protection and engineering are common within the DoD, reflecting the scale and complexity of military operations. The firm fixed-price nature suggests an effort to contain costs, but the ultimate value depends on the effectiveness and efficiency of the services delivered over the contract's lifespan.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is Booz Allen Hamilton's performance being measured?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or the performance measurement methodology for this contract. Typically, for protection services and engineering contracts, KPIs might include response times, incident resolution rates, security breach prevention statistics, adherence to safety protocols, and successful implementation of security infrastructure or plans. Performance is usually assessed through regular reviews, site visits, and reporting requirements outlined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS). The government contracting officer and technical representatives are responsible for monitoring these KPIs and ensuring Booz Allen Hamilton meets the contractual obligations. The absence of this information limits a thorough assessment of contractor performance.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with similar DoD contracts, particularly in protection services?

Booz Allen Hamilton is a large, well-established government contractor with a significant history of performing a wide range of services for the Department of Defense, including IT, cybersecurity, intelligence analysis, and management consulting. While the provided data doesn't detail their specific track record in 'Provost Marshall Protection Services,' their extensive experience with the DoD suggests they possess the organizational capacity and expertise to handle complex contracts. Past performance evaluations, often available through government contract databases or agency-specific reports, would provide more granular insights into their success with similar security and protection-related contracts. Their size and market presence indicate a generally reliable, though not necessarily inexpensive, provider.

What is the historical spending trend for Provost Marshal Protection Services or similar categories within the Department of the Army?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending trends. To analyze historical spending for Provost Marshal Protection Services or similar categories within the Department of the Army, one would need to query federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending.gov) for awards over multiple fiscal years, filtering by agency, relevant service descriptions, and NAICS codes. This would reveal patterns in contract values, awardees, and the overall investment in such services. Without this broader historical context, it's impossible to determine if this $27 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending for these specific services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,049,724

Exercised Options: $27,049,724

Current Obligation: $26,989,165

Actual Outlays: $1,452,303

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU108

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline