Fort Campbell Barracks Renovation Awarded to Intec Group LLC for $15.47 Million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,471,217 ($15.5M)

Contractor: Intec Group LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-12-15

End Date: 2027-09-07

Contract Duration: 631 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: THIS PROJECT IS A 100% DESIGN BUILD RENOVATION BARRACK BUILDING 4057, PROJECT, FE201310J, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORT CAMPBELL SPECIFIC GUIDELINES IN THEIR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.5 million to INTEC GROUP LLC for work described as: THIS PROJECT IS A 100% DESIGN BUILD RENOVATION BARRACK BUILDING 4057, PROJECT, FE201310J, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORT CAMPBELL SPECIFIC GUIDELINES IN THEIR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. Key points: 1. The contract represents a significant investment in military infrastructure at Fort Campbell. 2. Design-build approach aims for streamlined project delivery and potentially faster completion. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. 4. Competition was conducted under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' suggesting a potentially complex procurement process. 5. The project duration of 631 days indicates a substantial renovation effort. 6. The award is for a single barrack building, suggesting a phased approach to facility upgrades.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $15.47 million for a design-build barracks renovation appears within a reasonable range for large-scale construction projects of this nature. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm-fixed-price contract type is generally favorable for the government when scope is well-defined, as it caps the government's financial exposure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This specific procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation, potentially due to specific requirements or pre-qualification processes. The number of bidders (5) is a moderate level of competition, which can be sufficient to drive competitive pricing, but a higher number of bidders often leads to more aggressive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple firms to offer their best pricing and technical solutions to secure the contract.

Public Impact

Soldiers stationed at Fort Campbell will benefit from improved living quarters. The project will deliver a renovated barrack building, enhancing quality of life and operational readiness. The geographic impact is concentrated at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The construction will likely involve a local or regional workforce, providing employment opportunities in the skilled trades.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this sector often supports military readiness, government operations, and public infrastructure. The market size for federal construction is substantial, with significant annual outlays for facility maintenance, upgrades, and new builds across various agencies. This specific project contributes to the ongoing modernization of military housing and facilities.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem will depend on whether the prime contractor, Intec Group LLC, voluntarily includes small businesses in its subcontracting efforts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and project management offices at Fort Campbell. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified renovation within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through the federal procurement data system, where contract awards are publicly reported. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, fort-campbell, kentucky, design-build, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, barracks-renovation, military-infrastructure, delivery-order, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.5 million to INTEC GROUP LLC. THIS PROJECT IS A 100% DESIGN BUILD RENOVATION BARRACK BUILDING 4057, PROJECT, FE201310J, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORT CAMPBELL SPECIFIC GUIDELINES IN THEIR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEC GROUP LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-15. End: 2027-09-07.

What is Intec Group LLC's track record with similar federal design-build renovation projects, particularly for military barracks?

A review of Intec Group LLC's contract history reveals experience in various construction projects, including some federal work. However, specific details on their past performance with military barracks design-build renovations are not immediately available in the provided data. Further investigation into their portfolio, client feedback, and past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and track record for this specific type of project. Understanding their experience with similar scale and complexity projects is crucial for evaluating potential risks and ensuring successful project execution.

How does the awarded price of $15.47 million compare to similar barracks renovation projects at other military installations?

Benchmarking this $15.47 million award against similar barracks renovation projects requires access to a broader dataset of federal construction contracts. Factors such as building size, scope of renovation (e.g., structural, MEP, finishes), location, and specific design requirements significantly influence project costs. Without comparable project data, it is difficult to definitively state whether this price represents excellent, fair, or questionable value. However, for a large-scale renovation of a barrack building, this figure is not inherently outside the expected range for federal construction, but a detailed cost analysis against similar projects would be needed for a conclusive assessment.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this design-build contract for a barracks renovation?

Key risk indicators for this design-build contract include potential scope creep if the design-build process is not meticulously managed, leading to cost increases or delays. Unforeseen site conditions during the renovation of an existing structure could also pose a risk, potentially impacting the schedule and budget, although the firm-fixed-price contract shifts this risk primarily to the contractor. The contractor's ability to effectively manage subcontractors and ensure quality control throughout the project lifecycle is another critical factor. Furthermore, the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement method might indicate specific complexities or requirements that could introduce risks if not fully understood and addressed.

How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring program effectiveness for military barracks upgrades?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring cost control for military barracks upgrades, as it places the responsibility for managing costs and potential overruns on the contractor. This encourages the contractor to be efficient and complete the project within the agreed budget. For program effectiveness, FFP can be beneficial when the scope of work is clearly defined upfront, as it is in this design-build scenario. However, if the scope is not perfectly defined or if unforeseen issues arise that necessitate significant changes, the FFP structure can sometimes lead to disputes or a reluctance from the contractor to incorporate necessary changes without additional cost, potentially impacting the overall effectiveness if not managed carefully through change order processes.

What are the historical spending patterns for barracks renovation at Fort Campbell or within the Department of the Army?

Historical spending patterns for barracks renovation at Fort Campbell and within the Department of the Army typically show consistent investment in maintaining and upgrading military housing. These patterns are driven by the need to provide adequate living conditions for service members, comply with modern standards, and ensure the longevity of aging infrastructure. Spending can fluctuate based on military readiness priorities, budget allocations, and the overall condition of existing facilities. Large-scale renovation projects like this one are common as the Army cycles through its inventory of barracks, addressing deferred maintenance and modernization needs across various installations.

What is the significance of the 'delivery order' contract type in this context?

The 'delivery order' designation, in conjunction with the base contract, typically indicates that this award is a specific task order issued against a larger, pre-negotiated indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar multiple-award contract vehicle. This means that Intec Group LLC likely secured a position on a contract that allows the government to issue multiple delivery orders for various projects over a specified period. The use of delivery orders allows for flexibility and streamlined procurement for subsequent projects, as the terms, conditions, and pricing structures have already been established. This specific award represents one such order for the Fort Campbell barracks renovation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 429 CODELL DR STE 120, LEXINGTON, KY, 40509

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,471,217

Exercised Options: $15,471,217

Current Obligation: $15,471,217

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9124823D3007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-12-15

Current End Date: 2027-09-07

Potential End Date: 2027-10-07 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-11

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending