Fort Campbell Barracks Renovation Awarded to Intec Group LLC for $15.47 Million
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,471,217 ($15.5M)
Contractor: Intec Group LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-12-15
End Date: 2027-09-07
Contract Duration: 631 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: THIS PROJECT IS A 100% DESIGN BUILD RENOVATION BARRACK BUILDING 4057, PROJECT, FE201310J, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORT CAMPBELL SPECIFIC GUIDELINES IN THEIR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.
Place of Performance
Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.5 million to INTEC GROUP LLC for work described as: THIS PROJECT IS A 100% DESIGN BUILD RENOVATION BARRACK BUILDING 4057, PROJECT, FE201310J, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORT CAMPBELL SPECIFIC GUIDELINES IN THEIR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. Key points: 1. The contract represents a significant investment in military infrastructure at Fort Campbell. 2. Design-build approach aims for streamlined project delivery and potentially faster completion. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. 4. Competition was conducted under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' suggesting a potentially complex procurement process. 5. The project duration of 631 days indicates a substantial renovation effort. 6. The award is for a single barrack building, suggesting a phased approach to facility upgrades.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $15.47 million for a design-build barracks renovation appears within a reasonable range for large-scale construction projects of this nature. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm-fixed-price contract type is generally favorable for the government when scope is well-defined, as it caps the government's financial exposure.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This specific procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation, potentially due to specific requirements or pre-qualification processes. The number of bidders (5) is a moderate level of competition, which can be sufficient to drive competitive pricing, but a higher number of bidders often leads to more aggressive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple firms to offer their best pricing and technical solutions to secure the contract.
Public Impact
Soldiers stationed at Fort Campbell will benefit from improved living quarters. The project will deliver a renovated barrack building, enhancing quality of life and operational readiness. The geographic impact is concentrated at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The construction will likely involve a local or regional workforce, providing employment opportunities in the skilled trades.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if design-build elements are not tightly managed.
- Risk of delays if unforeseen site conditions are encountered during renovation.
- Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage subcontractors effectively.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risk for the government.
- Design-build approach can lead to efficiencies in project delivery.
- Award to a single contractor streamlines management and accountability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this sector often supports military readiness, government operations, and public infrastructure. The market size for federal construction is substantial, with significant annual outlays for facility maintenance, upgrades, and new builds across various agencies. This specific project contributes to the ongoing modernization of military housing and facilities.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem will depend on whether the prime contractor, Intec Group LLC, voluntarily includes small businesses in its subcontracting efforts.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and project management offices at Fort Campbell. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified renovation within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through the federal procurement data system, where contract awards are publicly reported. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Military Barracks Construction and Renovation
- Department of Defense Facilities Modernization
- Design-Build Construction Contracts
- Fort Campbell Infrastructure Projects
Risk Flags
- Procurement method 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' warrants further review to understand the rationale for source exclusion.
- Contract duration of 631 days for a single barrack renovation suggests a complex scope or potential for extended timelines.
- Lack of explicit small business subcontracting information requires monitoring.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, fort-campbell, kentucky, design-build, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, barracks-renovation, military-infrastructure, delivery-order, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.5 million to INTEC GROUP LLC. THIS PROJECT IS A 100% DESIGN BUILD RENOVATION BARRACK BUILDING 4057, PROJECT, FE201310J, IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORT CAMPBELL SPECIFIC GUIDELINES IN THEIR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTEC GROUP LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-12-15. End: 2027-09-07.
What is Intec Group LLC's track record with similar federal design-build renovation projects, particularly for military barracks?
A review of Intec Group LLC's contract history reveals experience in various construction projects, including some federal work. However, specific details on their past performance with military barracks design-build renovations are not immediately available in the provided data. Further investigation into their portfolio, client feedback, and past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and track record for this specific type of project. Understanding their experience with similar scale and complexity projects is crucial for evaluating potential risks and ensuring successful project execution.
How does the awarded price of $15.47 million compare to similar barracks renovation projects at other military installations?
Benchmarking this $15.47 million award against similar barracks renovation projects requires access to a broader dataset of federal construction contracts. Factors such as building size, scope of renovation (e.g., structural, MEP, finishes), location, and specific design requirements significantly influence project costs. Without comparable project data, it is difficult to definitively state whether this price represents excellent, fair, or questionable value. However, for a large-scale renovation of a barrack building, this figure is not inherently outside the expected range for federal construction, but a detailed cost analysis against similar projects would be needed for a conclusive assessment.
What are the primary risk indicators associated with this design-build contract for a barracks renovation?
Key risk indicators for this design-build contract include potential scope creep if the design-build process is not meticulously managed, leading to cost increases or delays. Unforeseen site conditions during the renovation of an existing structure could also pose a risk, potentially impacting the schedule and budget, although the firm-fixed-price contract shifts this risk primarily to the contractor. The contractor's ability to effectively manage subcontractors and ensure quality control throughout the project lifecycle is another critical factor. Furthermore, the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement method might indicate specific complexities or requirements that could introduce risks if not fully understood and addressed.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring program effectiveness for military barracks upgrades?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring cost control for military barracks upgrades, as it places the responsibility for managing costs and potential overruns on the contractor. This encourages the contractor to be efficient and complete the project within the agreed budget. For program effectiveness, FFP can be beneficial when the scope of work is clearly defined upfront, as it is in this design-build scenario. However, if the scope is not perfectly defined or if unforeseen issues arise that necessitate significant changes, the FFP structure can sometimes lead to disputes or a reluctance from the contractor to incorporate necessary changes without additional cost, potentially impacting the overall effectiveness if not managed carefully through change order processes.
What are the historical spending patterns for barracks renovation at Fort Campbell or within the Department of the Army?
Historical spending patterns for barracks renovation at Fort Campbell and within the Department of the Army typically show consistent investment in maintaining and upgrading military housing. These patterns are driven by the need to provide adequate living conditions for service members, comply with modern standards, and ensure the longevity of aging infrastructure. Spending can fluctuate based on military readiness priorities, budget allocations, and the overall condition of existing facilities. Large-scale renovation projects like this one are common as the Army cycles through its inventory of barracks, addressing deferred maintenance and modernization needs across various installations.
What is the significance of the 'delivery order' contract type in this context?
The 'delivery order' designation, in conjunction with the base contract, typically indicates that this award is a specific task order issued against a larger, pre-negotiated indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar multiple-award contract vehicle. This means that Intec Group LLC likely secured a position on a contract that allows the government to issue multiple delivery orders for various projects over a specified period. The use of delivery orders allows for flexibility and streamlined procurement for subsequent projects, as the terms, conditions, and pricing structures have already been established. This specific award represents one such order for the Fort Campbell barracks renovation.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 429 CODELL DR STE 120, LEXINGTON, KY, 40509
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,471,217
Exercised Options: $15,471,217
Current Obligation: $15,471,217
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9124823D3007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-12-15
Current End Date: 2027-09-07
Potential End Date: 2027-10-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-11
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)