Department of the Army awards $18.1M contract for barracks construction, highlighting significant investment in military infrastructure

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,101,088 ($18.1M)

Contractor: PM Jenkins Group-Professional Management Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-06-02

End Date: 2026-01-29

Contract Duration: 1,702 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DB REPAIR 1ST BCT VOLAR BARRACK BDG 3713

Place of Performance

Location: FORT CAMPBELL, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42223

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.1 million to PM JENKINS GROUP-PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC for work described as: DB REPAIR 1ST BCT VOLAR BARRACK BDG 3713 Key points: 1. The contract value represents a substantial investment in improving living conditions for service members. 2. The use of firm-fixed-price terms suggests a clear understanding of project scope and cost control. 3. The duration of the contract indicates a long-term commitment to the facility's development and maintenance. 4. The geographic location in Kentucky points to specific regional military base needs. 5. The procurement method, while excluding some sources, aimed for broad competition initially. 6. This project is crucial for maintaining operational readiness and personnel well-being.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $18.1 million award for barracks construction appears to be a significant investment in military infrastructure. Benchmarking against similar construction projects for military barracks is challenging without more specific details on scope and location. However, the firm-fixed-price contract type suggests a degree of cost certainty for the government. The value should be assessed in the context of the scale and complexity of the barracks being built, including the number of personnel to be housed and the specific amenities required.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was initially intended to be broad, certain sources were excluded at some stage. The specific reasons for exclusion are not detailed, but this approach can sometimes limit the pool of potential bidders. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to fully assess the level of competition achieved and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: While the exclusion of sources might limit the number of bidders, the initial intent for full and open competition suggests an effort to achieve a competitive price. Taxpayers benefit from a price that is determined through a competitive process, even if not entirely unrestricted.

Public Impact

Service members stationed at the Kentucky base will benefit from improved living quarters. The project delivers essential construction services for military housing. The geographic impact is concentrated in Kentucky, supporting the local military installation. The construction work will likely involve a workforce of skilled tradespeople and laborers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion, which could impact final pricing.
The long contract duration may introduce risks related to material cost fluctuations or unforeseen construction challenges.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
The substantial investment indicates a commitment to improving service member quality of life.
The project addresses a critical need for modern military housing infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically for military barracks. The construction industry is a significant part of the economy, and federal contracts like this contribute to its activity. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot or cost per bed for similar military housing projects across different bases and agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary contractor is likely a larger entity, and the impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether the prime contractor engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, though specific details on oversight activities or inspector general involvement would require further investigation.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction, Army
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Projects
Department of Defense Facilities Management
Barracks and Dormitory Construction

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation and performance issues.
Contractor performance history not detailed, requiring further due diligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.1 million to PM JENKINS GROUP-PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC. DB REPAIR 1ST BCT VOLAR BARRACK BDG 3713

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PM JENKINS GROUP-PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-06-02. End: 2026-01-29.

What is the specific scope of work for the DB REPAIR 1ST BCT VOLAR BARRACK BDG 3713 project?

The specific scope of work for the 'DB REPAIR 1ST BCT VOLAR BARRACK BDG 3713' contract involves repairs and potentially upgrades to barracks building 3713 for the 1st Brigade Combat Team. While the contract title suggests 'DB REPAIR,' the full scope would detail the extent of the repairs, which could range from structural improvements, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, to interior finishes and potentially modernization to meet current living standards for service members. The $18.1 million award indicates a significant undertaking, likely encompassing more than superficial repairs, possibly including modernization or expansion elements to improve habitability and functionality for the soldiers housed within.

How does the $18.1 million contract value compare to similar military barracks construction projects?

Comparing the $18.1 million contract value requires context on the size and scope of the barracks being repaired or constructed. Military barracks projects can vary significantly in cost based on the number of personnel they are designed to house, the level of modernization required, and the specific location and associated labor/material costs. For instance, a project to build new, modern barracks for a full brigade could easily run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. A repair and renovation project of this magnitude suggests either extensive work on a large existing structure or the construction of a substantial new facility. Without details on square footage, capacity, or specific upgrade requirements, a direct cost-per-unit or cost-per-square-foot benchmark is difficult, but $18.1 million represents a considerable investment in military infrastructure.

What are the primary risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for a multi-year construction project?

The primary risks associated with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract for a multi-year construction project like this one primarily lie with the contractor. The contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns due to factors such as unexpected material price increases, labor shortages, unforeseen site conditions, or design changes. If the contractor's costs exceed the fixed price, their profit margin shrinks or they may incur a loss. For the government, the main risk is that the contractor might cut corners on quality to maintain profitability if cost pressures become too high, although quality assurance measures are in place to mitigate this. The long duration (over 1700 days) amplifies these risks, particularly concerning material price volatility and potential labor market shifts.

What does the procurement method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' imply for cost and efficiency?

The procurement method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' implies a nuanced approach to achieving competition. Initially, the government intended to solicit bids from all responsible sources ('Full and Open Competition'). However, at some point, certain sources were excluded. The reasons for exclusion are critical; if based on specific technical requirements or past performance issues, it could be justified. If the exclusion was arbitrary, it could limit competition and potentially lead to higher prices or less innovative solutions. The efficiency and cost-effectiveness depend heavily on the justification for the exclusion and the number of remaining bidders. A robust competition among the remaining qualified bidders is still likely to yield a fair price, but the potential for broader competition was curtailed.

What is the track record of PM JENKINS GROUP-PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC in federal construction contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of PM JENKINS GROUP-PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC in federal construction contracts, particularly for projects of similar scale and complexity to the $18.1 million barracks repair, is not readily available in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance on federal contracts, including on-time delivery, adherence to budget, quality of work, and any history of disputes or contract modifications. Federal procurement databases and contractor performance systems (like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would typically hold such information, allowing for an evaluation of their reliability and expertise in managing large-scale construction projects for the Department of Defense.

How does the contract duration of 1702 days impact project management and taxpayer value?

A contract duration of 1702 days (approximately 4.6 years) for a construction project indicates a significant undertaking, likely involving extensive renovation, new construction, or phased development. For project management, this long duration necessitates robust oversight, regular progress monitoring, and proactive risk management to address potential issues like scope creep, material price volatility, and contractor performance over an extended period. From a taxpayer value perspective, a longer duration can sometimes lead to higher overall costs due to inflation and extended overheads. However, it can also allow for more thorough execution, potentially higher quality, and the ability to integrate complex phases or address unforeseen challenges without compromising the final outcome, thus potentially offering better long-term value if managed effectively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W9124817R0001

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 785 AUBURN AVE, PONTIAC, MI, 48342

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,101,088

Exercised Options: $18,101,088

Current Obligation: $18,101,088

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9124818D0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline