DoD Awards $11.5M for Pier Security Upgrades to Taber Construction, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,540,003 ($11.5M)
Contractor: Taber Construction, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-11-17
End Date: 2008-10-31
Contract Duration: 714 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: PIER SECURITY UPGRADES
Place of Performance
Location: CONCORD, CONTRA COSTA County, CALIFORNIA, 94519
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.5 million to TABER CONSTRUCTION, INC. for work described as: PIER SECURITY UPGRADES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for critical pier security infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition utilized, suggesting market availability. 3. Project duration of 714 days indicates a significant undertaking. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $11.5M for pier security upgrades appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar infrastructure projects is needed to assess if the pricing is competitive, especially considering the project's scope and duration.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive sign for taxpayer value, as it encourages a competitive bidding process that should lead to more reasonable pricing.
Public Impact
Enhances security at a critical naval facility. Supports military readiness and operational capabilities. Potential for job creation in the construction sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns given the project duration.
- Scope creep could impact final cost.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a large project.
Positive Signals
- Clear security objective.
- Competitive bidding process.
- Fixed price contract.
Sector Analysis
The construction sector, particularly for specialized infrastructure like naval piers, can involve complex logistics and significant investment. Benchmarks for similar projects are essential for evaluating cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and no small business participation is explicitly mentioned. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will be crucial to ensure the project stays within budget and schedule, given its scale and duration. Regular progress reports and quality inspections are standard for such federal construction contracts.
Related Government Programs
- Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Project duration may increase risk of cost escalation.
- Lack of detail on specific security threats addressed.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions.
- Contractor's past performance not detailed.
Tags
power-and-communication-line-and-related, department-of-defense, ca, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.5 million to TABER CONSTRUCTION, INC.. PIER SECURITY UPGRADES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TABER CONSTRUCTION, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-11-17. End: 2008-10-31.
What is the estimated cost per linear foot or square foot of the pier upgrades to compare against industry standards?
Without detailed project specifications, calculating a precise cost per unit is challenging. However, the total award of $11.5M for pier security upgrades over 714 days suggests a significant investment. Further breakdown of costs related to specific security features and structural improvements would be necessary for a meaningful benchmark against industry standards for similar naval infrastructure projects.
What are the specific security risks this upgrade addresses, and how effective are the chosen solutions?
The contract details do not specify the exact security risks being addressed. However, pier security typically involves measures against unauthorized access, sabotage, and potential threats from water or land. The effectiveness of the solutions would depend on the specific technologies and structural enhancements implemented, which require detailed technical review beyond the scope of this award data.
How does the firm-fixed-price contract mitigate potential cost overruns for this long-duration project?
A firm-fixed-price contract shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, providing cost certainty for the government. However, for a project of this duration (714 days), the initial price must account for potential contingencies. Effective oversight is still necessary to ensure the contractor manages costs efficiently and avoids scope creep, which could lead to change orders that increase the overall price.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Utility System Construction › Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W9123806R0049
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2278 PIKE CT STE A, CONCORD, CA, 10
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,668,037
Exercised Options: $11,570,395
Current Obligation: $11,540,003
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-11-17
Current End Date: 2008-10-31
Potential End Date: 2008-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-09-27
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)