DoD awards $13.2M for road reconstruction in Virginia, with Metro Paving Corp winning the contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,255,021 ($13.3M)
Contractor: Metro Paving Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-07-01
End Date: 2027-04-21
Contract Duration: 659 days
Daily Burn Rate: $20.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO REPAIR BY FULL DEPTH ROAD RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING ROADS: MEIGS DRIVE, SHERMAN DRIVE, SCHLEY DRIVE AND CONNECTING INTERSECTIONS.
Place of Performance
Location: FORT MYER, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22211
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.3 million to METRO PAVING CORP for work described as: GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO REPAIR BY FULL DEPTH ROAD RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING ROADS: MEIGS DRIVE, SHERMAN DRIVE, SCHLEY DRIVE AND CONNECTING INTERSECTIONS. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on full-depth road reconstruction, indicating a significant infrastructure investment. 2. Metro Paving Corp, the selected contractor, will be responsible for repairs on multiple roads and intersections. 3. The project duration spans nearly two years, suggesting a substantial scope of work. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. The award was made under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, implying a competitive bidding process. 6. The project is categorized under 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction', a broad but relevant sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.2 million for road reconstruction appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this scope, involving multiple road segments and intersections. Benchmarking against similar heavy civil engineering construction projects would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has secured a defined cost, but the final value could fluctuate based on unforeseen site conditions or change orders, though the risk is primarily on the contractor.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources'. This indicates that while the initial solicitation might have excluded certain sources for specific reasons, the final award was made through a competitive process where multiple bidders could participate. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition, which is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving a competitive price.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. The exclusion of sources, if justified, should be transparent to confirm it did not unduly limit competition.
Public Impact
Military personnel and their families stationed in Virginia will benefit from improved road infrastructure. The project will deliver essential road repairs and reconstruction for Meigs Drive, Sherman Drive, Schley Drive, and connecting intersections. The geographic impact is localized to the specific military installation or area in Virginia where these roads are located. The construction activities will likely create temporary employment opportunities for skilled labor in the civil engineering and construction sectors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite the firm fixed-price structure.
- The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants scrutiny to ensure it did not unnecessarily limit competition.
- The duration of the project could lead to prolonged disruptions for users of the affected roads.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor, potentially protecting the government from budget overruns.
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market was engaged.
- The project addresses critical infrastructure needs, enhancing safety and accessibility.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' sector, which encompasses a wide range of infrastructure projects. The market for such services is typically characterized by a mix of large, established firms and smaller specialized contractors. Federal spending in this sector is often driven by military base improvements, transportation infrastructure, and other public works. The value of this contract, $13.2 million, is moderate for a federal construction project of this nature.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific award, as the 'sb' (small business) flag is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided data. This suggests that the prime contractor, Metro Paving Corp, may not be obligated to subcontract a significant portion of the work to small businesses, which could limit opportunities for the small business ecosystem on this particular project.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Accountability measures will be embedded within the contract's terms, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award announcements and public contract databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction
- Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) projects
- Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) projects
- Army Corps of Engineers construction contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts can sometimes lead to higher initial bids to cover contractor risk.
- Infrastructure projects are susceptible to delays and cost increases due to unforeseen site conditions.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, virginia, heavy-civil-engineering, road-reconstruction, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, infrastructure, metro-paving-corp
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.3 million to METRO PAVING CORP. GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO REPAIR BY FULL DEPTH ROAD RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING ROADS: MEIGS DRIVE, SHERMAN DRIVE, SCHLEY DRIVE AND CONNECTING INTERSECTIONS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is METRO PAVING CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-07-01. End: 2027-04-21.
What is the track record of Metro Paving Corp with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?
Information regarding Metro Paving Corp's specific track record with federal contracts, especially within the Department of Defense, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require accessing federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to review past performance, contract history, and any reported issues or accolades. This would help assess their experience with similar projects, their ability to meet deadlines and quality standards, and their overall reliability as a federal contractor. Without this historical data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their suitability beyond the current award.
How does the $13.2 million contract value compare to similar road reconstruction projects undertaken by the Department of Defense in Virginia?
Benchmarking the $13.2 million contract value against similar road reconstruction projects by the Department of Defense in Virginia requires access to historical contract data. Factors such as the scope of work (e.g., linear feet of road, complexity of intersections, depth of reconstruction), material costs, labor rates, and prevailing economic conditions at the time of award significantly influence project costs. A preliminary assessment suggests the value is substantial for a localized infrastructure project. However, a detailed comparison with projects of comparable scale and complexity in the same geographic region would be necessary to determine if this represents good value for money or if it is potentially high or low.
What are the specific risks associated with a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award type?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award type presents a nuanced risk profile. While it aims for broad competition, the 'exclusion of sources' element implies that certain potential bidders were deliberately not considered. The primary risk is that this exclusion, if not adequately justified and documented, could have artificially limited the competitive pool, potentially leading to higher prices or reduced innovation than a truly unrestricted full and open competition. Transparency regarding the reasons for exclusion is crucial. If the exclusion was based on legitimate technical requirements or security concerns, the risk is mitigated. However, if it was arbitrary, it could signal a less efficient use of taxpayer funds or potential favoritism.
What is the expected impact of this road reconstruction on the operational readiness and quality of life at the affected military installation?
The road reconstruction project is expected to significantly enhance operational readiness and quality of life at the affected military installation. Improved road surfaces reduce wear and tear on military vehicles, potentially lowering maintenance costs and ensuring better mobility. For personnel and their families, smoother and safer roads will improve daily commutes, access to housing, and overall base accessibility. This infrastructure upgrade contributes to a more functional and pleasant living and working environment, indirectly supporting morale and the overall mission effectiveness of the installation.
Are there any historical spending patterns or trends related to road maintenance and reconstruction at this specific Department of Defense facility in Virginia?
The provided data does not contain information on historical spending patterns for road maintenance and reconstruction at this specific Department of Defense facility in Virginia. To analyze such trends, one would need to examine past contract awards for similar services at this location over several fiscal years. This would involve looking at the frequency of repairs, the average cost per project, the types of work performed (e.g., routine maintenance vs. full reconstruction), and the contractors historically utilized. Understanding these patterns could reveal whether this $13.2 million award represents a significant increase in spending, a cyclical investment, or a response to a backlog of deferred maintenance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W9123621R2012
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5470 LAFAYETTE PLACE, HYATTSVILLE, MD, 20781
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,811,021
Exercised Options: $13,255,021
Current Obligation: $13,255,021
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9123621D2012
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-07-01
Current End Date: 2027-04-21
Potential End Date: 2027-04-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-18
More Contracts from Metro Paving Corp
- Project NP JFK1(2) Nama16(2) TRL(1): the Project Consists of Kennedy Center Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Access and Safety Improvements, and Rehabilitation of Rock Creek and Potomac Parkway (route 16). the Work Includes Asphalt Pavement Mill and Over — $19.9M (Department of Transportation)
- This Project IS to Repair by Full Depth Road Reconstruction of the Following Roads: Sheridan Drive, Wilson Drive, Mcclellan Drive, and the Weeks/Grant Loop — $13.1M (Department of Defense)
- Project Np-Gwmp 6(1), 7(2): the Project Consists of the Rehabilitation of the Clara Barton Parkway and Associated Parking Areas, Access Roads, and Ramps Within the George Washington Memorial Parkway. the Work Includes Asphalt Pavement Milling and O — $9.3M (Department of Transportation)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)