DoD's $13.1M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to John H. Northrop & Associates, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,143,696 ($13.1M)
Contractor: John H. Northrop & Associates, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-11-17
End Date: 2026-11-30
Contract Duration: 1,109 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ANALYSIS SERVICES (PEAS) PAVELCHAK, L TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE - AVIATION SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND DEMONSTRATION (TDD-A/SID)
Place of Performance
Location: FORT EUSTIS, NEWPORT NEWS CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23604
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.1 million to JOHN H. NORTHROP & ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ANALYSIS SERVICES (PEAS) PAVELCHAK, L TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE - AVIATION SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND DEMONSTRATION (TDD-A/SID) Key points: 1. Contract awarded for professional engineering and analysis services to support aviation systems integration. 2. The contract duration is over 3 years, indicating a significant, long-term need. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market for these services. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which transfers some risk to the contractor. 5. The specific NAICS code (541330) points to a specialized engineering services sector. 6. Virginia is the state of performance, potentially indicating a concentration of defense-related work. 7. This contract is a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $13.1 million for over three years of engineering and analysis services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of aviation systems integration and demonstration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for complex defense systems integration would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control, as it incentivizes the contractor to manage expenses effectively.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of a single award delivery order suggests that John H. Northrop & Associates, Inc. was selected as the best value among the competing firms. The level of competition is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring a fair market price.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and specifically the Army's Aviation Systems Integration and Demonstration programs. Services delivered include professional engineering and analysis crucial for advancing aviation technology and integration. The geographic impact is centered in Virginia, where the performance is scheduled. The contract supports specialized engineering roles, potentially impacting the workforce in the aerospace and defense engineering sectors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs, despite the fixed-price nature.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical engineering services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
- The long duration might lead to technological obsolescence if not managed proactively.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive selection process.
- Contract supports critical defense technology development, aligning with national security objectives.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting the aerospace and defense industry. The market for specialized aviation systems integration and demonstration services is highly technical and often dominated by a few key players. Spending in this area is driven by the need for advanced military capabilities and technological superiority. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within large defense contracts for system development and integration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor, John H. Northrop & Associates, Inc., may engage small businesses for subcontracting opportunities, which would need to be assessed through their subcontracting plan if applicable.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of the Army's contracting officers and technical representatives within the Technology Development Directorate. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Aviation Systems Integration
- Defense Engineering Services
- Technology Development Directorate Contracts
- Army Aviation Programs
- Aerospace Engineering Support
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
- Potential for scope creep despite fixed-price contract.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical services.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, engineering-services, aviation-systems-integration, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, professional-services, virginia, technology-development
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.1 million to JOHN H. NORTHROP & ASSOCIATES, INC.. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ANALYSIS SERVICES (PEAS) PAVELCHAK, L TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE - AVIATION SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND DEMONSTRATION (TDD-A/SID)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is JOHN H. NORTHROP & ASSOCIATES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-11-17. End: 2026-11-30.
What is the track record of John H. Northrop & Associates, Inc. with the Department of Defense, particularly in aviation systems integration?
A thorough review of John H. Northrop & Associates, Inc.'s contract history with the Department of Defense is necessary to assess their track record. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and their experience with similar-sized and complex aviation systems integration projects. Understanding their past performance provides insight into their capability to successfully execute this current $13.1 million contract. Specific data on their prior DoD awards, performance ratings, and any documented successes or failures in related fields would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment.
How does the $13.1 million value compare to similar engineering services contracts for aviation systems integration within the DoD?
To benchmark the $13.1 million value, a comparative analysis of recent contracts for similar professional engineering and analysis services in aviation systems integration and demonstration is required. This would involve identifying contracts with comparable scopes of work, durations, and agencies within the DoD. Factors such as the complexity of the systems being integrated, the level of research and development involved, and the specific deliverables will influence pricing. If this contract's value is significantly higher or lower than comparable awards, it could indicate potential issues with pricing, scope definition, or market competitiveness.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will they be measured to ensure value for money?
The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, for a contract focused on professional engineering and analysis services for aviation systems integration, typical KPIs might include adherence to project timelines, successful completion of technical milestones, quality of engineering reports and analyses, and effective integration of system components. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests that meeting these defined technical and schedule requirements is paramount. Value for money will be assessed by comparing the achieved outcomes against the contract's objectives and the price paid, likely through technical reviews and performance assessments conducted by the Army.
What is the potential risk associated with the long duration (over 3 years) of this contract for aviation systems integration?
The long duration of over three years for this aviation systems integration contract presents several potential risks. Firstly, technological advancements in aviation can be rapid; a multi-year project might risk developing solutions based on outdated technology by its completion. Secondly, there's a risk of scope creep, where the project's objectives expand over time, potentially leading to cost overruns if not managed strictly, despite the fixed-price nature. Thirdly, contractor performance stability over an extended period can be a concern. Effective risk mitigation would involve robust project management, regular technology reviews, and clear change control processes.
How does the 'full and open competition' award mechanism impact the overall cost-effectiveness and innovation for this DoD contract?
Awarding this contract through 'full and open competition' generally enhances cost-effectiveness and can foster innovation. It allows a broad range of qualified contractors to bid, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and identifying the most capable provider. This competitive pressure incentivizes bidders to offer their best value propositions. Furthermore, bringing multiple perspectives to the table can spur innovation as contractors propose different approaches to meet the technical requirements. The selection of John H. Northrop & Associates, Inc. under this mechanism suggests they offered the best combination of technical merit and price.
What is the significance of this contract being a 'Delivery Order' within the context of broader DoD procurement strategies?
The fact that this is a 'Delivery Order' signifies that it is likely issued under a pre-existing Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract vehicle. IDIQ contracts provide agencies with flexibility to procure services or supplies over a period, with specific orders placed as needed. This approach allows the DoD to establish a pool of pre-vetted contractors and streamline the procurement process for recurring needs. For this specific contract, it means the $13.1 million represents a specific task order for engineering and analysis services, rather than the total potential value of the underlying IDIQ contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W911W623R0006
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11602 LAWTER LN, CLIFTON, VA, 20124
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,765,204
Exercised Options: $15,147,385
Current Obligation: $13,143,696
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0168T
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-11-17
Current End Date: 2026-11-30
Potential End Date: 2029-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-11-19
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)