DoD's $17.6M Facilities Support Services Contract with Akima Infrastructure Services Shows Long-Term Engagement

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,593,737 ($17.6M)

Contractor: Akima Infrastructure Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-03-17

End Date: 2013-11-30

Contract Duration: 2,084 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: (NON PERSONAL) PERSONNEL SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GORDON, RICHMOND County, GEORGIA, 30905

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.6 million to AKIMA INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LLC for work described as: (NON PERSONAL) PERSONNEL SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract value suggests a significant investment in facilities support services for the Department of the Army. 3. A long duration of over 2000 days points to a stable, long-term relationship for essential services. 4. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 5. The contract was awarded to a single entity, Akima Infrastructure Services LLC. 6. The 'GA' award type suggests a specific contracting mechanism, potentially related to geographic or programmatic considerations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more granular data on the specific services provided and their scope. However, a $17.6 million contract over approximately 5.7 years for facilities support services for the Department of the Army appears within a reasonable range for large-scale support operations. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the costs involved, which can lead to better value if the contractor can efficiently deliver the required services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies that while the competition was initially broad, certain sources may have been excluded based on specific criteria. The presence of 12 bidders indicates a healthy level of competition, which generally benefits the government by driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The exclusion of sources, however, warrants further investigation to ensure it did not unduly limit competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process with multiple bidders helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by securing services at a fair market price. The exclusion of sources, if justified, should not negatively impact the value for taxpayers.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from consistent and reliable facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. Personnel at military installations managed under this contract receive essential services, contributing to their quality of life and work environment. The contract likely supports facilities in Georgia, given the 'SN' (State Name) field indicating 'GEORGIA'. The provision of facilities support services creates and sustains jobs within the contractor's workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The exclusion of sources in a full and open competition needs clarification to ensure no potential bidders were unfairly disadvantaged.
The long contract duration could lead to complacency if not managed with rigorous oversight.
The specific nature of 'Facilities Support Services' is broad and could encompass a wide range of activities, making direct cost comparisons difficult without more detail.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
The firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability for the government.
A significant number of bidders (12) indicates strong market interest and potential for competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader commercial and institutional building services industry. This sector is characterized by a mix of large, established providers and smaller, specialized firms. Government contracts for facilities support are substantial, encompassing maintenance, repair, operations, and management of physical infrastructure. The market size for such services is significant, driven by the extensive real estate holdings of federal agencies. This contract represents a portion of the government's overall spending on maintaining its operational infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication from the provided data that this contract included a small business set-aside. The contractor, Akima Infrastructure Services LLC, is likely a larger entity. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but they are not explicitly detailed in this summary. The absence of a set-aside suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best overall offer from the competitive field, rather than specifically targeting small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Army. Performance metrics and quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) would be crucial for ensuring accountability and transparency. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract places the onus on the contractor to manage costs effectively. Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support (BOS)
Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Real Estate and Facilities Management
Government Contracting Services

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.6 million to AKIMA INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LLC. (NON PERSONAL) PERSONNEL SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AKIMA INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-03-17. End: 2013-11-30.

What specific types of facilities support services are included under this contract?

The provided data categorizes this contract under NAICS code 561210, which corresponds to Facilities Support Services. This broad category typically encompasses a range of activities such as building operations and maintenance, groundskeeping, custodial services, pest control, and potentially security services. Without access to the full contract statement of work (SOW), the precise scope of services, including the specific types of facilities managed, the level of maintenance required, and any specialized support functions, remains undefined. Understanding the granular details of the services is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of value and performance.

How does the $17.6 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?

Comparing the $17.6 million value requires context regarding the contract's duration and scope. This contract spans approximately 5.7 years (2084 days), equating to an average annual value of roughly $3.09 million. The Department of Defense awards numerous facilities support contracts, varying significantly in size and complexity based on the installation's needs. Larger installations or those with extensive infrastructure may have contracts in the tens or hundreds of millions annually. This $17.6 million contract, spread over several years, appears to be a substantial but not exceptionally large award for comprehensive facilities support, suggesting it may cover a significant facility or a group of smaller ones within a specific region.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Akima Infrastructure Services LLC's performance under this contract?

Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided summary. However, for Facilities Support Services contracts, common KPIs often include response times for maintenance requests, completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, customer satisfaction surveys (e.g., from base personnel), energy efficiency targets, compliance with safety regulations, and overall facility uptime. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract incentivizes the contractor to meet these performance standards efficiently. The Department of the Army's Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) would outline the specific metrics and methods for monitoring Akima's performance.

What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services by the Department of the Army in Georgia?

The provided data indicates this specific contract (awarded 2008-03-17, ending 2013-11-30) was associated with 'GA' (Georgia). To analyze historical spending trends for facilities support services by the Department of the Army in Georgia, one would need to query federal procurement databases for all contracts awarded under NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) to the Department of the Army, specifically targeting contracts performed in Georgia, over a relevant period (e.g., the last 5-10 years). This would reveal the total annual expenditure, the number of contracts awarded, and the primary contractors involved, providing insights into budget allocation and market dynamics within the state.

What is the significance of the contract type 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'?

This contract type signifies a nuanced approach to competition. 'Full and open competition' is the standard preferred method, meaning all responsible sources are permitted to submit offers. However, the addition of 'after exclusion of sources' indicates that prior to the solicitation, certain potential sources were identified and excluded based on specific, documented reasons. These reasons could include factors like past performance issues, inability to meet minimum requirements, or specific statutory or regulatory exclusions. While the intent is to ensure a competitive environment among qualified bidders, the exclusion process must be transparent and justifiable to avoid perceptions of impropriety or undue restriction of competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W911SE07R0025

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Nana Regional Corporation Inc (UEI: 079253761)

Address: 1001 E BENSON BLVD STE 101E, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99508

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,624,487

Exercised Options: $17,593,737

Current Obligation: $17,593,737

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline