DoD's $12.1M temporary staffing contract with Goldbelt Falcon LLC awarded via limited competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,112,905 ($12.1M)

Contractor: Goldbelt Falcon LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-08-08

End Date: 2008-12-31

Contract Duration: 511 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: LABOR FOR COBS

Place of Performance

Location: FORT DIX, BURLINGTON County, NEW JERSEY, 08640

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.1 million to GOLDBELT FALCON LLC for work described as: LABOR FOR COBS Key points: 1. Contract awarded through a limited competition process, raising questions about potential cost savings from broader market engagement. 2. The contract's duration of 511 days suggests a need for sustained support, but the lack of detailed performance metrics makes value assessment challenging. 3. While Goldbelt Falcon LLC is the prime contractor, the specific services provided under 'LABOR FOR COBS' are not fully detailed, impacting performance analysis. 4. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on defense-related administrative or operational support. 5. The absence of a specific Product Service Code (PSC) makes direct comparison to similar contracts difficult. 6. The contract's value of over $12 million warrants scrutiny regarding efficiency and necessity of the temporary staffing services procured.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.1 million for temporary staffing services over approximately 17 months appears substantial. Without specific details on the number of personnel, their roles, or the duration of their assignments, it is difficult to benchmark the per-person cost against market rates or similar government contracts. The limited competition aspect also suggests that the government may not have achieved the most competitive pricing possible. Further analysis would require understanding the specific skill sets and labor categories procured.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under a limited competition, meaning that not all eligible sources were solicited. The specific justification for this limited competition is not provided in the data. This approach typically results in fewer bids compared to full and open competition, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation. The number of bidders is not specified, but the limited nature suggests a constrained selection process.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition can result in taxpayers paying more than they might under a fully competitive environment, as the pool of potential providers is restricted, thereby reducing price pressure.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely Department of Defense personnel and operations requiring temporary administrative or specialized support. The services delivered are categorized as 'LABOR FOR COBS' and 'Temporary Help Services', suggesting support for various functions within the Army. The contract's geographic impact is centered in New Jersey, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the provision of temporary staff, potentially augmenting existing military or civilian workforces during periods of high demand or personnel shortages.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition may have led to suboptimal pricing for taxpayers.
Lack of detailed service descriptions hinders performance and value assessment.
The contract's duration and value suggest a significant reliance on external staffing, raising questions about long-term workforce planning.
Absence of a specific PSC makes benchmarking and comparison difficult.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a specific entity (Goldbelt Falcon LLC), indicating a known provider.
The contract duration suggests a recognized need for sustained support services.
Awarded by the Department of the Army, implying alignment with defense mission requirements.

Sector Analysis

The temporary staffing industry is a significant component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Government agencies, including the Department of Defense, frequently utilize temporary staffing contracts to fill short-term needs, manage fluctuating workloads, or access specialized skills without the long-term commitment of hiring permanent employees. The market for these services is competitive, but government procurement processes, especially those involving limited competition, can influence pricing and provider selection. Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without more granular data on the roles and skill levels of the temporary staff.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Goldbelt Falcon LLC, is not specified as a small business in the provided data. The absence of small business participation goals or reporting requirements means this contract does not directly contribute to the small business contracting ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is limited by the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status and the lack of detailed service descriptions. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply if fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Temporary Staffing Contracts
Army Professional and Administrative Support Services
Temporary Labor Services Procurement
Federal Staff Augmentation Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited Competition Award
Lack of Detailed Service Description
Absence of Performance Metrics
Unclear Justification for Limited Competition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.1 million to GOLDBELT FALCON LLC. LABOR FOR COBS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GOLDBELT FALCON LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-08-08. End: 2008-12-31.

What specific roles and skill sets were procured under the 'LABOR FOR COBS' designation?

The provided data does not specify the exact roles or skill sets encompassed by 'LABOR FOR COBS'. This designation, along with 'Temporary Help Services', suggests a broad category of support personnel. These could range from administrative assistants and clerical staff to specialized technicians or analysts required for specific projects or operational needs within the Department of the Army. Without this detail, it is impossible to assess if the $12.1 million expenditure was appropriate for the services rendered or to benchmark against similar, more specifically defined, labor categories.

What was the justification for awarding this contract via limited competition?

The data indicates the contract was awarded via 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', which is a form of limited competition. However, the specific justification for this procurement approach is not provided. Typically, justifications for limited competition include factors such as urgency, unique capabilities of a single source, or specific statutory authority. Without this information, it is difficult to ascertain whether limited competition was appropriate or if it potentially led to a less competitive price for the government. A thorough review would require accessing the contract's justification and approval (J&A) document.

How does the $12.1 million contract value compare to similar temporary staffing contracts awarded by the DoD?

Direct comparison of the $12.1 million contract value is challenging due to the lack of specific details regarding the services procured and the limited competition award. General market rates for temporary staffing vary widely based on skill level, duration, and geographic location. However, for a contract spanning approximately 17 months (August 2007 to December 2008), $12.1 million suggests a significant number of personnel or highly specialized roles. Without comparable contracts that specify the number of staff, their hourly rates, and the total hours worked, a precise benchmark is not feasible. Further analysis would require accessing databases with more granular contract data.

What performance metrics were used to evaluate Goldbelt Falcon LLC's service delivery?

The provided data does not include information on the performance metrics or evaluation criteria established for this contract. Government contracts for temporary staffing typically include clauses related to timeliness, quality of personnel provided, and adherence to labor laws. The effectiveness of the contract and the value received by the Department of the Army would be assessed against these metrics. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it difficult to gauge the contractor's performance and the overall success of the procurement in meeting its objectives.

What is the historical spending pattern for temporary help services by the Department of the Army in New Jersey?

The provided data focuses on a single contract awarded in 2007-2008. To understand historical spending patterns for temporary help services by the Department of the Army in New Jersey, a broader analysis of multiple contracts over several fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve examining contract databases for similar service codes (like NAICS 561320) and geographic locations. Without this broader dataset, it's impossible to determine if this $12.1 million contract represents a typical, increased, or decreased level of spending for such services in that region during that period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Employment Services › Temporary Help Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W911SE07R0028

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Goldbelt, Incorporated (UEI: 096763800)

Address: 11833 CANON BLVD STE 100, NEWPORT NEWS, VA, 03

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,112,905

Exercised Options: $12,112,905

Current Obligation: $12,112,905

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline