DoD's $19.3M environmental services contract awarded to Envirotech Environmental Services Inc. shows potential value concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,341,280 ($19.3M)

Contractor: Envirotech Environmental Services Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-08

End Date: 2011-03-14

Contract Duration: 2,013 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200512!501366!2100!W911SE!ACA, SOUTH REGION CONTRACTING CT!GS10F0218L !C!N! !Y!W911SE05F0298! !20050908!20060914!008588634!008588634!008588634!N!ENVIROTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI!161 ANDREW DR 200 !STOCKBRIDGE !GA!30281!30928!121!13!FORT MCPHERSON !FULTON !GEORGIA !+000000505808!N!N!000000000000!F999!OTHER ENVIRON SVCS, STUDIES,&ANALYTICAL SUPPORT !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541620!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!B!Y!N! !B! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! !Y! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: STOCKBRIDGE, HENRY County, GEORGIA, 30281

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.3 million to ENVIROTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC for work described as: 200512!501366!2100!W911SE!ACA, SOUTH REGION CONTRACTING CT!GS10F0218L !C!N! !Y!W911SE05F0298! !20050908!20060914!008588634!008588634!008588634!N!ENVIROTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI!161 ANDREW DR 200 !STOCKBRIDGE !GA!30281!30928!121!13!FORT MCPHERSON !FULT… Key points: 1. The contract's duration and final cost suggest a potentially higher-than-average per-unit expense for environmental consulting. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, indicating a broad market search, but the number of bids received is not specified. 3. The contract's performance period spanned over six years, allowing for potential cost escalation or scope creep. 4. While specific performance metrics are not detailed, the nature of environmental services implies a need for rigorous quality control. 5. The contract falls under the 'Other Environmental Services, Studies, & Analytical Support' category, a broad area with varying cost drivers. 6. The contractor, Envirotech Environmental Services Inc., has a track record with this specific contract, but broader performance data is needed for a full assessment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $19.3 million over a period of approximately six years (September 2005 to March 2011) for environmental consulting services warrants a closer look. Without specific details on the scope of work, it's challenging to benchmark against similar contracts. However, the extended duration could indicate a substantial project or a series of tasks. The final cost relative to the initial estimated value (if available) and the specific deliverables would be crucial for a definitive value-for-money assessment. The absence of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to ascertain if the services provided met all objectives efficiently.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition,' suggesting that the Department of Defense sought bids from all responsible sources. This approach is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring a competitive market. However, the number of bids received is a critical missing piece of information. A high number of bids typically indicates robust competition and can lead to better pricing for the government. Conversely, a low number of bids, even under full and open competition, might suggest limitations in the market or specific requirements that narrowed the field.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is intended to maximize taxpayer value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices. The effectiveness of this particular instance depends on the number of responsive bids received and the resulting pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Army, likely at Fort McPherson, Georgia, receiving essential environmental consulting services. Services delivered include environmental studies, analysis, and support, crucial for compliance and operational readiness. The geographic impact is localized to Georgia, specifically Fort McPherson and surrounding areas, addressing environmental concerns within that region. The contract supports a specialized workforce in environmental consulting, contributing to the professional services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality and effectiveness of the environmental services provided.
The extended contract duration (over six years) could mask inefficiencies or scope creep if not managed tightly.
Information on the number of bidders is missing, which is crucial for evaluating the true level of competition and its impact on pricing.
Benchmarking the per-unit cost against similar environmental consulting contracts is difficult without more granular data on the services rendered.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating an effort to leverage the broadest possible market.
The contractor, Envirotech Environmental Services Inc., successfully secured a significant contract, suggesting a level of capability and responsiveness.
The contract addresses critical environmental services, which are vital for military installations and regulatory compliance.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically under Environmental Consulting Services (NAICS code 541620). This sector is characterized by specialized expertise and is often driven by regulatory requirements and complex project needs. The market size for environmental consulting is substantial, with government contracts forming a significant portion. This particular award represents a mid-sized contract within the broader federal spending landscape for environmental services, which can range from small, specialized studies to large-scale remediation projects.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses. The award amount and the nature of the services suggest it may have been competed more broadly. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses could exist, depending on the specific requirements of the environmental services rendered, but this information is not provided in the data. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless significant subcontracting occurred.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would typically involve performance reviews, milestone tracking, and adherence to contract terms. Transparency is facilitated by contract databases like FPDS, which provide basic award information. However, detailed operational oversight reports or Inspector General involvement specific to this contract are not publicly detailed in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Environmental Planning and Assessment
Architectural and Engineering Services
Logistics and Base Support Services
Government Consulting Contracts

Risk Flags

Missing number of bidders
Lack of detailed performance metrics
Ambiguous scope of work
Extended contract duration without clear milestones

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.3 million to ENVIROTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. 200512!501366!2100!W911SE!ACA, SOUTH REGION CONTRACTING CT!GS10F0218L !C!N! !Y!W911SE05F0298! !20050908!20060914!008588634!008588634!008588634!N!ENVIROTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI!161 ANDREW DR 200 !STOCKBRIDGE !GA!30281!30928!121!13!FORT MCPHERSON !FULTON !GEORGIA !+000000505808!N!N!000000000000!F999!OTHER ENVIRON SVCS, STUDIES,&ANALYTICAL SUPPORT !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541620!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !20200

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIROTECH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-08. End: 2011-03-14.

What was the specific scope of work for Envirotech Environmental Services Inc. under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under 'OTHER ENVIRONRONMENTAL SERVICES, STUDIES, & ANALYTICAL SUPPORT' (NAICS 541620). This broad category suggests services could range from environmental impact assessments, compliance monitoring, hazardous materials management, site surveys, regulatory consulting, to policy analysis related to environmental issues at Fort McPherson and potentially surrounding areas. Without a detailed Statement of Work (SOW) or task orders, the precise nature of the studies and analytical support remains unspecified. The contract was a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle, implying a defined set of potential services that could be called upon as needed by the Army.

How does the final award amount of $19.3 million compare to the initial estimated value or ceiling of the contract vehicle?

The provided data shows a total award amount of $19,341,280.09. However, the initial estimated value or ceiling of the parent contract vehicle (GS10F0218L) under which this delivery order was placed is not explicitly stated in the abbreviated data. To assess how the final award compares to the initial estimate, one would need to access the details of the base contract. If the $19.3 million represents the full value of the base contract or a significant portion of its ceiling, it indicates a substantial commitment. If it's just one of many delivery orders against a much larger ceiling, its relative size is less indicative of overall contract value.

What was the number of bids received for this contract, and how does that inform the level of competition?

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' which signifies that the solicitation was made available to all interested businesses. However, the abbreviated data does not specify the number of bids or proposals received in response to this solicitation. A robust competition typically involves multiple bidders, which can lead to better pricing and service options for the government. If only one or two bids were received, it might suggest limitations in the market for these specific environmental services or potential issues with the solicitation itself, potentially impacting the government's ability to secure the best value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of Envirotech Environmental Services Inc.'s performance?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the performance of Envirotech Environmental Services Inc. under this contract. Typically, government contracts include clauses related to performance standards, quality assurance, and delivery schedules. For environmental services, KPIs might relate to the accuracy of studies, timeliness of reports, compliance with regulatory standards, or successful completion of analytical tasks. Without access to the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or any associated performance reports, assessing the contractor's success is not possible from this data alone.

What is the historical spending trend for similar environmental consulting services within the Department of the Army or Department of Defense?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award. To understand historical spending trends for similar environmental consulting services within the Department of the Army or Department of Defense, a broader analysis of federal procurement data (e.g., FPDS) over multiple fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve filtering for relevant NAICS codes (like 541620) and agencies. Such an analysis could reveal patterns in contract values, types of services procured, dominant contractors, and overall budget allocations for environmental services, providing context for the $19.3 million award to Envirotech.

Were there any specific environmental challenges or projects at Fort McPherson that necessitated this contract?

The data identifies the location as Fort McPherson, Georgia, and the service category as environmental consulting. Fort McPherson has historically been a U.S. Army base, and like many long-standing military installations, it may have faced environmental challenges related to past operations, such as soil or groundwater contamination, asbestos management, or compliance with environmental regulations. This contract likely supported efforts to assess, manage, or remediate such issues, ensuring the base met federal and state environmental standards during the contract period (2005-2011).

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 161 ANDREW DR SUITE 200, STOCKBRIDGE, GA, 30281

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0218L

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline