DoD awards $25.1M for DPW Support Services to Erica Lane Enterprises Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,106,125 ($25.1M)

Contractor: Erica Lane Enterprises Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2020-03-01

End Date: 2025-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,917 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DPW SUPPORT SERVICES - BASE YEAR

Place of Performance

Location: FORT MCCOY, MONROE County, WISCONSIN, 54656

State: Wisconsin Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.1 million to ERICA LANE ENTERPRISES INC for work described as: DPW SUPPORT SERVICES - BASE YEAR Key points: 1. Contract value of $25.1M over its period of performance suggests a significant need for facilities support. 2. The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government, shifting performance risk to the contractor. 4. The duration of the contract (1917 days) points to a long-term requirement for these services. 5. The contractor, Erica Lane Enterprises Inc., is the sole awardee for this delivery order. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 categorizes this as Facilities Support Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount of $25.1 million for facilities support services over approximately five years appears to be within a reasonable range for a contract of this scope. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Army or other DoD components would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific details on the services rendered and their quality, a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness is challenging. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator of value if the price is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically involves soliciting bids from all responsible prospective contractors. The presence of 3 bidders indicates a degree of competition, though the exact number of proposals received and the evaluation process are not detailed. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The fact that it was competed suggests an effort to achieve fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes a level playing field, encourages multiple companies to bid, and can drive down prices through competitive pressure.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense (specifically the Department of the Army) benefits from the provision of essential facilities support services. These services likely encompass a range of maintenance, repair, and operational support for government facilities. The contract is geographically focused on Wisconsin, impacting local operations and potentially local economies. The contract may have implications for the local workforce in Wisconsin, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in facilities management and support roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's effectiveness and efficiency.
The firm fixed-price contract, while offering cost certainty, could incentivize the contractor to minimize costs, potentially impacting service quality if not closely monitored.
The specific scope of 'DPW Support Services' is broad and requires further definition to fully understand the services being procured.
Limited information on the contractor's past performance on similar large-scale contracts.
The contract duration is substantial, increasing the risk associated with long-term contractor performance and potential changes in government needs.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process and potential for competitive pricing.
The firm fixed-price contract type shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor, which can be advantageous for the government.
The contract is for essential facilities support, indicating a critical operational need being met.
The contractor is Erica Lane Enterprises Inc., which may have specific expertise in facilities support services.
The contract is being performed in Wisconsin, potentially supporting the local economy and workforce.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a broad sector encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and other real property. This includes services such as general building maintenance, janitorial services, landscaping, pest control, and security systems maintenance. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, particularly for its vast portfolio of military bases, administrative buildings, and research facilities. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, base realignment and closure initiatives, and overall defense or agency budgets. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found by analyzing other large-scale facilities support contracts awarded by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA), Department of Homeland Security, or other branches of the Department of Defense.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting requirements specifically mandated for small businesses as part of this award. The primary contractor, Erica Lane Enterprises Inc., will be responsible for fulfilling the contract requirements. While not a small business set-aside, the prime contractor may still engage small businesses as subcontractors based on their own business strategy or the specific needs of the services required. The absence of a set-aside means that large businesses were eligible to compete and potentially win this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army, which is the awarding agency. The contract's performance is likely monitored by contracting officers and technical representatives who ensure compliance with the terms and conditions, service level agreements, and delivery schedules. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor is responsible for managing costs, but the government retains oversight to ensure the quality and completeness of services rendered. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS-NG, which provide award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Base Operations Support
Logistics and Support Services
Government Property Management
Commercial and Institutional Building Services

Risk Flags

Potential for service quality degradation over long contract duration.
Risk of contractor cost overruns not being fully captured by fixed-price if scope changes.
Limited transparency on specific performance metrics and evaluation criteria.
Contractor's past performance on similar large-scale contracts requires further investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.1 million to ERICA LANE ENTERPRISES INC. DPW SUPPORT SERVICES - BASE YEAR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ERICA LANE ENTERPRISES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-03-01. End: 2025-05-31.

What is the specific breakdown of services included under 'DPW Support Services' for this contract?

The provided data abbreviates the contract description as 'DPW SUPPORT SERVICES - BASE YEAR'. DPW typically stands for Directorate of Public Works. Facilities Support Services, under NAICS code 561210, can encompass a wide array of tasks including, but not limited to, general building maintenance, custodial services, grounds maintenance, minor repairs, utility management, waste management, and potentially security or access control for facilities. Without the full contract statement of work (SOW), the precise services are not detailed. However, given the base year designation and the substantial award amount, it is likely a comprehensive package of services essential for the day-to-day operation and upkeep of government facilities in Wisconsin.

How does the $25.1 million award compare to historical spending on similar facilities support contracts by the Department of the Army?

The $25.1 million award for DPW Support Services represents a significant investment over its performance period (March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2025, approximately 5 years). To benchmark this, one would need to analyze historical contract awards for facilities support services issued by the Department of the Army, particularly those with similar scopes (e.g., base operations support, general maintenance) and durations. Factors such as geographic location, specific services included, and the economic climate at the time of award influence pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests this is a substantial contract, but without comparative data on the number of bidders, service levels, and specific tasks, it's difficult to definitively state if it represents superior or inferior value compared to other Army contracts. Further analysis of contract databases would be required.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Erica Lane Enterprises Inc.'s performance under this contract?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics for this contract. Typically, for facilities support services, KPIs might include response times for maintenance requests, completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, customer satisfaction scores from facility users, adherence to safety protocols, and quality of janitorial or groundskeeping services. The government contracting officer and technical representatives are responsible for monitoring these aspects. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor is incentivized to meet performance standards to ensure profitability, but the government must actively track performance against the contract's requirements to ensure value and service delivery.

What is the track record of Erica Lane Enterprises Inc. in performing large-scale government facilities support contracts?

Information regarding Erica Lane Enterprises Inc.'s specific track record on large-scale government facilities support contracts is not detailed in the provided summary data. To assess their capabilities, one would need to examine their contract history, including past performance evaluations, any awards or penalties received, and the size and complexity of previous contracts they have managed. Federal procurement data systems (like FPDS-NG) can provide a list of contracts awarded to a specific entity. A thorough review of these records, including any available past performance information or CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) reports, would be necessary to gauge their experience and reliability in delivering similar services.

Given the 1917-day duration, what are the potential risks associated with long-term contractor performance and changing government needs?

A contract duration of 1917 days (approximately 5.25 years) presents several potential risks. For the contractor, there's the risk of fluctuating labor costs, material prices, and the need to maintain operational efficiency over an extended period. For the government, risks include the potential for contractor performance degradation over time, the possibility that the contractor's capabilities may not keep pace with evolving technological needs in facilities management, and the challenge of adapting the contract scope if government requirements change significantly. Furthermore, long-term reliance on a single contractor could reduce flexibility and potentially lead to complacency. Robust contract management, regular performance reviews, and clear mechanisms for contract modification or termination are crucial to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W911SA20R3000

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3226 BOB WALLACE AVE SW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35805

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,106,125

Exercised Options: $25,106,125

Current Obligation: $25,106,125

Actual Outlays: $828,009

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA18D0061

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline