DoD's $17.7M CONUS Bridge Funding contract awarded to Engility LLC for management consulting services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,683,418 ($17.7M)
Contractor: Engility LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-09-29
End Date: 2008-02-29
Contract Duration: 153 days
Daily Burn Rate: $115.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: CONUS BRIDGE FUNDING.
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.7 million to ENGILITY LLC for work described as: CONUS BRIDGE FUNDING. Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for services. 3. The short duration of 153 days indicates a project with a defined, near-term scope. 4. The contract falls under administrative management and general management consulting services. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. 6. The contract was issued as a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order is challenging without knowing the scope of services and the underlying IDIQ contract it belongs to. The total award amount of approximately $17.7 million for a 153-day period suggests a significant daily expenditure. Without comparable delivery orders for similar management consulting services under the same IDIQ or similar contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing was competitive or represented good value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically suggests a robust bidding process where multiple companies had the opportunity to compete for the work. The number of bidders is not specified, but the designation implies a level of market engagement that should theoretically lead to competitive pricing and selection of the best value offer.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation, leading to better value for public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely components within the Department of Defense requiring administrative and management consulting support. The services delivered are focused on general management and administrative functions, aiming to improve operational efficiency. The geographic impact is specified as CONUS (Continental United States), indicating services are performed within the US. Workforce implications are not detailed but could involve consultants from Engility LLC supporting government personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the consulting services.
- The short duration might indicate a tactical or short-term need, potentially masking larger, ongoing issues.
- Without details on the specific consulting tasks, it's hard to gauge the true value delivered for the $17.7M expenditure.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair and competitive process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type helps in managing and controlling costs.
- The contract is for management consulting, a service area that can bring efficiency improvements to government operations.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant part of federal contracting, supporting various agencies in optimizing their operations. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise. The approximate value of this single delivery order is substantial for its short duration, suggesting a focused but high-impact engagement.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus was likely on large business prime contractors. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this particular delivery order. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Engility LLC utilized small business subcontractors, which is not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. As a delivery order, it likely falls under a larger IDIQ contract with its own oversight framework. Transparency is limited by the available data; specific performance reports or audits are not provided. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Management and Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Administrative Support
- CONUS Operations Support
- Army Consulting Contracts
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics.
- Limited detail on the scope of services provided.
- Potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly despite fixed price.
- Difficulty in benchmarking value without comparable data.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, management-consulting, administrative-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, conus, professional-services, engility-llc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.7 million to ENGILITY LLC. CONUS BRIDGE FUNDING.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-09-29. End: 2008-02-29.
What specific management and administrative consulting services were provided under this contract?
The contract description 'CONUS BRIDGE FUNDING' and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) suggest the services were related to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of administrative processes and management practices within the Continental United States. However, the specific tasks, deliverables, and areas of focus (e.g., organizational restructuring, process improvement, strategic planning support, financial management consulting) are not detailed in the provided data. Without this granular information, it's difficult to ascertain the precise nature of the consulting engagement and its direct impact on the Army's operations.
How does the $17.7 million award compare to typical spending on similar management consulting contracts by the Department of the Army?
Comparing this $17.7 million delivery order requires context regarding its duration and scope. For a 153-day period, this represents a significant daily expenditure, averaging over $115,000 per day. To benchmark effectively, one would need to analyze similar delivery orders or task orders issued under relevant IDIQ contracts for management consulting services by the Army. Factors like the complexity of the issues addressed, the level of expertise required, and the number of consultants deployed would influence the cost. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable Army consulting contracts, it's challenging to definitively state whether this award was high, low, or average relative to similar engagements.
What is Engility LLC's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in management consulting?
Engility LLC (which has since been acquired by SAIC) historically held numerous contracts with the Department of Defense across various service areas, including IT, engineering, and professional services. Their track record with the DoD would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any reported issues or successes. For management consulting specifically, assessing their performance would require examining feedback on previous similar contracts, client satisfaction surveys, and adherence to contract terms and objectives. A comprehensive review would look at the consistency of their performance across multiple engagements and their ability to deliver value within budget and schedule.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. Typically, for management consulting engagements, KPIs might include improvements in process efficiency (e.g., reduced cycle times), cost savings achieved, successful implementation of recommendations, enhanced organizational effectiveness, or improved strategic alignment. The absence of defined KPIs makes it difficult to objectively measure the contractor's performance and the overall value derived from the $17.7 million investment. Future analysis would benefit from identifying if such metrics were established in the full contract documentation.
How has the Department of the Army's spending on administrative management and general management consulting services evolved over time?
Analyzing the evolution of the Department of the Army's spending on administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) would require a multi-year trend analysis. This would involve examining historical contract award data to identify patterns in spending levels, the types of services procured, the primary contracting vehicles used (e.g., IDIQs, specific solicitations), and the major contractors involved. Factors influencing spending could include shifts in strategic priorities, budget allocations, government-wide initiatives (like efficiency drives), and the increasing complexity of defense operations. This specific $17.7 million contract represents a single data point within that broader spending landscape.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)
Address: 4803 STONECROFT BLVD, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,262,820
Exercised Options: $17,683,418
Current Obligation: $17,683,418
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F9814H
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-09-29
Current End Date: 2008-02-29
Potential End Date: 2008-02-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-11-25
More Contracts from Engility LLC
- Federal Contract — $363.5M (Department of Defense)
- Labor Worldwide Linguist Support Service — $363.0M (Department of Defense)
- Labor/Worldwide Linguist Support Service TAS::21 2020::TAS — $331.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200612!008781!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !daab0702dp001 !A!N! !Y!0107 ! !20060923!20061031!849594288!849594288!849594288!N!L-3 Communications Ilex System!1413 Cantillon Blvd !mays Landing !nj!08330!24480!025!34!fort Monmouth !monmouth !NEW Jersey!+000005082039!n!n!000000000000!r425!engineering Technical Services !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!004!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !d!d!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $325.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200211!004228!2100!AB07 !USA Communications-Electronics !daab0702dp001 !A!N! !Y!0018 !20020801!20061031!939131665!939131665!939131665!n!itel Solutions, an Ilex Telos !1413 Cantillion Blvd !mays Landing !nj!08330!24670!003!04!fort Huachuca !cochise !arizona !+000008312053!n!n!000000000000!r425!engineering Technical Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !513310!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!004!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !d!d!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! !gy0hk8!0001! — $219.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)