Army Awards $2.96M for Dining Facility Attendant Services in Kansas

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,961,808 ($3.0M)

Contractor: Kansas Department for Children and Families

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-02

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 363 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FORT RILEY, GEARY County, KANSAS, 66442

State: Kansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $3.0 million to KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES for work described as: DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $2.96M for food service. 2. No competition was utilized for this award. 3. Potential risk associated with sole-source procurement. 4. Sector: Other (Food Service Contractors).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.96M for 363 days of service appears high without a competitive benchmark. Further analysis of service scope and comparable contracts is needed.

Cost Per Unit: $8,159 (estimated annual cost per contract)

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may result in a higher cost to taxpayers compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the lack of competition.

Public Impact

Ensures essential food services for military personnel. Lack of competition raises concerns about cost-effectiveness. Potential for improved service quality and cost through competition.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for overpricing
  • Limited transparency

Positive Signals

  • Ensures essential service delivery
  • Clear contract duration

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under food service contractors, a segment within the broader services sector. Benchmarks for similar services are difficult to ascertain without competitive data.

Small Business Impact

No indication of small business participation in this sole-source award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial to ensure the contractor meets service requirements and that the pricing remains fair, especially given the sole-source nature of the award.

Related Government Programs

  • Food Service Contractors
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • No documented competition
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited transparency in pricing

Tags

food-service-contractors, department-of-defense, ks, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $3.0 million to KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-02. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the justification for the sole-source award, and how does it ensure best value?

The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was bypassed. Agencies must demonstrate that only one source can meet the requirement or that it's in the government's best interest. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the government received best value or if taxpayers are overpaying.

What are the risks associated with a sole-source contract for dining facility services?

The primary risks include inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure, potential for complacency in service quality, and limited innovation. Without market forces driving efficiency, the government may not achieve the most cost-effective solution or the highest level of service.

How can the effectiveness of these dining facility attendant services be measured and ensured?

Effectiveness can be measured through performance metrics outlined in the contract, such as food quality, service timeliness, cleanliness, and customer satisfaction surveys. Regular performance reviews and clear communication channels between the contracting officer's representative and the contractor are essential for ensuring services meet or exceed expectations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Accommodation and Food ServicesSpecial Food ServicesFood Service Contractors

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W911RX25Q1AMC

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 555 S KANSAS AVE, TOPEKA, KS, 66603

Business Categories: Category Business, Council of Governments, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business, U.S. Regional/State Government

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,098,847

Exercised Options: $5,098,847

Current Obligation: $2,961,808

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W911RX25DA005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-02

Current End Date: 2026-08-31

Potential End Date: 2026-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-29

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending