DoD's $12.37M Fort Greely power redundancy contract awarded to ASRC Prime Constructors, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,370,000 ($12.4M)

Contractor: Asrc Prime Constructors, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-07-29

End Date: 2027-04-30

Contract Duration: 640 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: FTG257 MISSILE FIELD 2 POWER REDUNDANCY, FORT GREELY, ALASKA

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GREELY, SOUTHEAST FAIRBANKS County, ALASKA, 99731

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.4 million to ASRC PRIME CONSTRUCTORS, LLC for work described as: FTG257 MISSILE FIELD 2 POWER REDUNDANCY, FORT GREELY, ALASKA Key points: 1. The contract aims to enhance power reliability for critical missile field infrastructure. 2. ASRC Prime Constructors, LLC, a known entity in government contracting, secured this award. 3. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. The project's duration of 640 days suggests a significant scope of work. 5. This award falls under the 'Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction' NAICS code. 6. The contract's value is substantial for its specific construction niche.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12.37 million for power redundancy at Fort Greely appears reasonable given the critical nature of missile field infrastructure and the scope of construction involved. While direct comparisons are difficult without more granular data on similar projects, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost expectation. Benchmarking against other Department of the Army construction projects of similar complexity would provide further insight into value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while competition was sought, certain sources were initially excluded. The presence of two bidders suggests a degree of competition, but the exclusion of other potential sources may have limited the overall competitive landscape. This approach can sometimes be used for specialized requirements where only a few contractors possess the necessary qualifications.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may mean that taxpayers did not benefit from the lowest possible price that could have been achieved through broader, unrestricted competition.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and national security, through enhanced reliability of critical missile defense systems. The services delivered include the construction of power and communication lines and related structures. The geographic impact is localized to Fort Greely, Alaska, a key strategic location. The contract will likely involve a workforce skilled in heavy construction and electrical infrastructure, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in Alaska.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite the fixed-price contract.
Risk of schedule delays due to the remote location and potential weather challenges in Alaska.
Dependence on a limited number of bidders could impact long-term pricing for future related work.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
Award to ASRC Prime Constructors, LLC, suggests a contractor with demonstrated experience in similar government projects.
Focus on power redundancy directly addresses a critical operational need for the missile field.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically focusing on power and communication infrastructure. The market for such specialized construction services for defense installations is often characterized by a limited number of highly qualified contractors. Spending in this niche is driven by the need to maintain and upgrade critical national security assets, with values often substantial due to the demanding requirements and locations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, ASRC Prime Constructors, LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors based on their own procurement strategies.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed budget. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Missile Defense Agency Infrastructure Projects
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
Department of Defense Facility Modernization
Critical Infrastructure Protection Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price discovery.
Remote location poses logistical and weather-related risks.
Potential for unforeseen site conditions in construction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.4 million to ASRC PRIME CONSTRUCTORS, LLC. FTG257 MISSILE FIELD 2 POWER REDUNDANCY, FORT GREELY, ALASKA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASRC PRIME CONSTRUCTORS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-07-29. End: 2027-04-30.

What is the track record of ASRC Prime Constructors, LLC with the Department of Defense?

ASRC Prime Constructors, LLC has a history of performing work for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. As a subsidiary of Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, it leverages significant resources and experience. While specific details of past performance on similar power redundancy projects would require deeper analysis of contract databases, their presence as a prime contractor on this significant award suggests a demonstrated capability to meet DoD requirements. Reviewing past performance evaluations and any past performance issues would provide a more complete picture of their reliability and effectiveness in executing complex construction projects for the government.

How does the $12.37 million value compare to similar power infrastructure projects for military bases?

Benchmarking the $12.37 million value requires comparing it to similar power and communication line construction projects at military installations. Factors such as geographic location (Alaska's higher construction costs), specific technical requirements (missile field power redundancy is highly specialized), and the overall scope (duration of 640 days) significantly influence cost. Without access to a detailed database of comparable projects with these specific parameters, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, for critical infrastructure upgrades at a strategic site like Fort Greely, this figure is within a plausible range for complex, multi-year construction efforts.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential schedule delays due to the remote Alaskan location and challenging weather conditions, which can impact construction timelines and potentially increase costs if not managed effectively. Despite the firm-fixed-price structure, unforeseen site conditions or technical challenges during the installation of power and communication lines could lead to change orders or disputes. Furthermore, the 'limited competition' aspect, while potentially necessary for specialized work, carries a risk that the initial pricing may not reflect the full potential of a more open market, impacting long-term value for taxpayers.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach for specialized defense construction?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach is a strategy used when specific technical expertise or security clearances are required, limiting the pool of eligible contractors. For specialized defense construction, this can be effective in ensuring that only qualified entities bid, thereby reducing the risk of award to an inexperienced contractor. However, it inherently limits the number of bidders, potentially reducing price competition compared to truly unrestricted full and open competition. The effectiveness hinges on whether the exclusion criteria were justified and if the remaining pool still offered sufficient competitive tension to drive a fair price.

What is the historical spending trend for power infrastructure at Fort Greely or similar missile defense sites?

Analyzing historical spending trends for power infrastructure at Fort Greely or similar missile defense sites would provide crucial context. Such analysis would involve examining past contracts awarded for electrical upgrades, maintenance, and new installations at these facilities over several years. Trends might reveal patterns of increasing costs due to inflation, technological advancements, or specific security requirements. Understanding this history helps in evaluating whether the current $12.37 million award represents a reasonable escalation or a deviation from established spending norms, informing future budget projections and procurement strategies for critical infrastructure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Utility System Construction › Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3900 C STREET, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,370,000

Exercised Options: $12,370,000

Current Obligation: $12,370,000

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $748,306

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline