Army awards $24.8M for JBER barracks construction to Korte-Purcell JV under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,793,929 ($24.8M)
Contractor: Korte-Purcell JV
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-05-11
End Date: 2013-06-26
Contract Duration: 777 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: FTR269B - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT MANEUVER ENCHANCEMENT BRIGADE COMPLEX, PHASE I BARRACKS AT JBER (FORT RICHARDSON) ALASKA
Place of Performance
Location: JBER, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99506
State: Alaska Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.8 million to KORTE-PURCELL JV for work described as: FTR269B - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT MANEUVER ENCHANCEMENT BRIGADE COMPLEX, PHASE I BARRACKS AT JBER (FORT RICHARDSON) ALASKA Key points: 1. Construction project for military barracks at JBER, Alaska. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting market availability. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs. 4. Project duration of 777 days indicates a significant undertaking.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $24.8 million for barracks construction appears within a reasonable range for a project of this scale and location. However, without specific per-unit cost data or detailed scope, a precise benchmark is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely able to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition and a firm fixed price contract suggests efforts to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently and that the final price reflects market conditions.
Public Impact
Enhances living conditions for military personnel at JBER. Supports military readiness and operational capabilities. Contributes to the local economy through construction activities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed cost breakdowns for per-unit analysis.
- Potential for cost overruns in remote locations like Alaska.
- Contract duration may be subject to delays.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Project addresses critical infrastructure needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a sector vital for infrastructure development. Spending benchmarks for similar military construction projects vary widely based on location, scope, and specific requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the prime contractor is Korte-Purcell JV. It is unclear from this data alone whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors, which is a common practice in construction.
Oversight & Accountability
Standard DoD oversight mechanisms would apply to this contract, including contract administration and quality assurance to ensure compliance with terms and specifications.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost escalation due to remote location.
- Contract duration is lengthy, increasing risk of unforeseen issues.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown hinders granular analysis.
- Firm Fixed Price may not account for all potential Alaska-specific challenges.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ak, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.8 million to KORTE-PURCELL JV. FTR269B - DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT MANEUVER ENCHANCEMENT BRIGADE COMPLEX, PHASE I BARRACKS AT JBER (FORT RICHARDSON) ALASKA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KORTE-PURCELL JV.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-05-11. End: 2013-06-26.
What was the specific square footage or number of personnel the barracks were designed to accommodate to better assess value?
Without specific details on the barracks' capacity (e.g., square footage per soldier, total personnel housed), it's challenging to perform a precise value assessment. This information is crucial for comparing the cost per square foot or cost per occupant against industry standards and similar military housing projects.
Were there any specific environmental or logistical challenges in Alaska that could have impacted the final cost and timeline?
Alaska's unique logistical challenges, including weather, remote access, and specialized labor requirements, can significantly inflate construction costs and extend timelines. Understanding if these factors were adequately accounted for in the firm fixed price is key to assessing potential risks and ensuring the contractor absorbed these complexities.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the government received the best possible price for this construction?
The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for achieving competitive pricing. However, effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation, the number and quality of bids received, and the evaluation criteria used. A thorough review of the bidding process would confirm if the chosen price truly represented the best value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W911KB10R0015
Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5700 OAKLAND AVE #200, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63110
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,798,048
Exercised Options: $24,793,929
Current Obligation: $24,793,929
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 168
Total Subaward Amount: $285,177,881
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-05-11
Current End Date: 2013-06-26
Potential End Date: 2013-06-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-06-04
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)