Army Awards $61.7M for Alaska Family Housing, Bear Paw Construction Wins Contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $36,601,034 ($36.6M)

Contractor: Bear PAW Construction LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-04-07

End Date: 2008-07-05

Contract Duration: 820 days

Daily Burn Rate: $44.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200607!600413!2100!W911KB!USA ENGR DISTR ALASKA !W911KB06C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20060407!20080705!617812198!617812198!617812198!N!BEAR PAW CONSTRUCTION LLC !3509 INTERNATIONAL ST !FAIRBANKS !AK!99701!24230!090!02!FAIRBANKS !FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR !ALASKA !+000036225610!N!N!000036225610!Y161!FAMILY HOUSING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236116!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !B! !A!U!J!1!002!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!B!Y!Y! ! !C! !A!A!000!A!B!Y!U!Y! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT WAINWRIGHT, FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR County, ALASKA, 99703

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $36.6 million to BEAR PAW CONSTRUCTION LLC for work described as: 200607!600413!2100!W911KB!USA ENGR DISTR ALASKA !W911KB06C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20060407!20080705!617812198!617812198!617812198!N!BEAR PAW CONSTRUCTION LLC !3509 INTERNATIONAL ST !FAIRBANKS !AK!99701!24230!090!02!FAIRBANKS !FAIR… Key points: 1. The contract awarded was for multifamily housing construction in Alaska. 2. Bear Paw Construction LLC, based in Fairbanks, AK, secured the $61.7 million contract. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The project duration was approximately 820 days, indicating a significant construction undertaking.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $61.7 million for multifamily housing construction appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this scale and duration. However, without specific cost breakdowns or benchmarks for similar projects in Alaska, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for soliciting bids and ensuring fair pricing. This method typically leads to better price discovery and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes a competitive environment, potentially leading to lower costs and higher quality services.

Public Impact

This contract directly impacts housing availability and quality for military families stationed in Alaska. The construction project will likely create local jobs in Fairbanks and the surrounding areas. Investment in military family housing can improve morale and retention rates for service members.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in remote locations like Alaska.
Weather-related delays impacting construction timeline and costs.
Ensuring quality of construction for long-term durability.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Addresses critical need for military family housing.
Significant investment in Alaskan infrastructure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically for multifamily housing. Construction projects, especially in remote or challenging environments like Alaska, can be subject to significant cost fluctuations due to material sourcing, labor, and logistical complexities.

Small Business Impact

While the contract was awarded to Bear Paw Construction LLC, the data does not indicate if this is a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation or subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the USA ENGR DISTR ALASKA, part of the Department of the Army. Oversight would involve monitoring the construction progress, adherence to specifications, and financial management throughout the contract period.

Related Government Programs

New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders)
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to remote location.
Risk of weather-related construction delays.
Ensuring long-term durability and quality of housing.
Logistical challenges in material and equipment delivery.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $36.6 million to BEAR PAW CONSTRUCTION LLC. 200607!600413!2100!W911KB!USA ENGR DISTR ALASKA !W911KB06C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20060407!20080705!617812198!617812198!617812198!N!BEAR PAW CONSTRUCTION LLC !3509 INTERNATIONAL ST !FAIRBANKS !AK!99701!24230!090!02!FAIRBANKS !FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR !ALASKA !+000036225610!N!N!000036225610!Y161!FAMILY HOUSING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236116!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BEAR PAW CONSTRUCTION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $36.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-04-07. End: 2008-07-05.

What was the specific scope of work for the 'Family Housing Facilities' and how does the $61.7 million price align with industry standards for similar projects in remote Alaskan locations?

The contract was for 'New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders)'. The $61.7 million price for 820 days of work is substantial, but without detailed project specifications (e.g., number of units, square footage, amenities, specific construction challenges in Alaska), it's difficult to benchmark against industry standards. Remote locations often incur higher costs due to logistics and specialized labor requirements.

Given the remote location and the nature of construction, what are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies were likely employed?

Key risks include weather delays, material transportation costs, potential labor shortages, and unforeseen site conditions common in Alaska. Mitigation strategies likely involved detailed logistical planning, robust weather contingency clauses in the contract, pre-qualification of subcontractors, and potentially higher contingency budgets factored into the initial pricing.

How effectively does this contract address the need for quality family housing for military personnel in Alaska, and what is the long-term value proposition?

The contract aims to provide new multifamily housing, directly addressing a critical need for military families in Alaska. The long-term value lies in improved quality of life for service members, potentially boosting morale and retention. The effectiveness hinges on the quality of construction and the durability of the facilities over their lifespan.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Residential Building Construction › New Multifamily Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders)

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3509 INTERNATIONAL ST, FAIRBANKS, AK, 00

Business Categories: Category Business, Emerging Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, Woman Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline