Army Awards $10.8M Dredging Contract to Western Marine Construction for Alaska Project

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,795,572 ($10.8M)

Contractor: Western Marine Construction, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-03-17

End Date: 2008-01-30

Contract Duration: 1,049 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200512!500512!96CE!W911KB!USA ENGR DISTR ALASKA !W911KB05C0008 !A!N! !N! ! !20050317!20061231!027484393!027484393!027484393!N!WESTERN MARINE CONSTRUCTION IN!1011 SW KLICKITAT WAY,SUIT!SEATTLE !WA!98134!67032!010!02!SAND POINT AIRPORT !ALEUTIAN ISLANDS !ALASKA !+000000100000!N!N!000010905240!Z216!DREDGING, EXCL. DUSTPAN AND SEA-GOING HOPPERS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !237990!E! !3!C!S! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !B! !A!U!J!2!006!A! !D!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!Y! ! !Z! !A!D!010!A!B!Y!S!N! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: SAND POINT, ALEUTIANS EAST County, ALASKA, 99661

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.8 million to WESTERN MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. for work described as: 200512!500512!96CE!W911KB!USA ENGR DISTR ALASKA !W911KB05C0008 !A!N! !N! ! !20050317!20061231!027484393!027484393!027484393!N!WESTERN MARINE CONSTRUCTION IN!1011 SW KLICKITAT WAY,SUIT!SEATTLE !WA!98134!67032!010!02!SAND POINT AIRPORT !ALEU… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $10,795,572, was awarded for dredging services. 2. Western Marine Construction, Inc. secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The project is located in Alaska, specifically Sand Point Airport in the Aleutian Islands. 4. The contract duration was 1049 days, indicating a significant, long-term undertaking.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.8 million for dredging services appears reasonable given the project's scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale civil engineering projects would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process likely resulted in a fair price, maximizing taxpayer value for the dredging services.

Public Impact

Enhances critical infrastructure in remote Alaskan locations, supporting military and civilian operations. Supports economic activity through construction and related services in the region. Ensures navigational safety and accessibility in the Aleutian Islands.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to remote location and environmental factors.
  • Contract duration may lead to scope creep or changes in requirements.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through full and open competition, indicating competitive pricing.
  • Contract supports critical infrastructure in a strategic location.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, specifically dredging. Spending in this sector is often driven by infrastructure development, military base support, and environmental projects.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Western Marine Construction, Inc., a large business. There is no indication of specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating federal oversight. The use of a definitive contract suggests a clear scope and terms, subject to standard government auditing and review processes.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract duration is lengthy, increasing risk of scope changes.
  • Remote Alaskan location may lead to logistical challenges and higher costs.
  • Environmental factors in Alaska could impact project timelines and expenses.
  • Lack of specific performance data makes it difficult to assess execution quality.

Tags

other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, ak, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.8 million to WESTERN MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC.. 200512!500512!96CE!W911KB!USA ENGR DISTR ALASKA !W911KB05C0008 !A!N! !N! ! !20050317!20061231!027484393!027484393!027484393!N!WESTERN MARINE CONSTRUCTION IN!1011 SW KLICKITAT WAY,SUIT!SEATTLE !WA!98134!67032!010!02!SAND POINT AIRPORT !ALEUTIAN ISLANDS !ALASKA !+000000100000!N!N!000010905240!Z216!DREDGING, EXCL. DUSTPAN AND SEA-GOING HOPPERS !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !* !237990!E! !3!C!S! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WESTERN MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-17. End: 2008-01-30.

What specific dredging techniques were employed, and how did they impact the overall cost and environmental considerations?

The data specifies 'DREDGING, EXCL. DUSTPAN AND SEA-GOING HOPPERS,' suggesting methods other than those typically associated with hopper dredges. The exact techniques are not detailed, but the exclusion implies a focus on specific operational needs. Understanding the chosen methods is crucial for assessing efficiency, environmental impact mitigation, and adherence to the contract's technical specifications.

Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during the 1049-day duration that affected the final cost or delivery?

The provided data does not detail any performance issues or contract modifications. A comprehensive review would require access to contract performance reports, modification logs, and final payment records. Without this, it's difficult to assess if the initial award value remained stable or if changes led to cost adjustments or schedule delays.

How does the cost per unit of dredged material compare to similar projects in comparable geographic or environmental conditions?

Calculating a precise per-unit cost requires knowing the total volume of material dredged, which is not explicitly provided in the data. The contract value is $10.8 million over a period of 1049 days. To benchmark effectively, we would need the total cubic yards or tons of material removed and compare it to industry standards for similar Alaskan or Arctic dredging projects.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering ConstructionOther Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: SHIPS, SMALL CRAFT, PONTOON, DOCKS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: HZE

Contractor Details

Address: 1011 SW KLICKITAT WAY,SUIT, SEATTLE, WA, 98134

Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-03-17

Current End Date: 2008-01-30

Potential End Date: 2008-01-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-25

More Contracts from Western Marine Construction, Inc.

View all Western Marine Construction, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending