DoD awards $10.3M engineering services contract to YULISTA GAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC for 2-year period
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,348,710 ($10.3M)
Contractor: Yulista GAN Technology Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-09-28
End Date: 2026-09-27
Contract Duration: 729 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: IEWTD AND TTD
Place of Performance
Location: FORT HUACHUCA, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85613
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.3 million to YULISTA GAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IEWTD AND TTD Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a potentially limited but justified bidding process. 2. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored. 3. The duration of 729 days suggests a significant project requiring sustained engineering support. 4. The contract is for engineering services, a critical function for the Department of Defense. 5. The awardee, YULISTA GAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC, is based in Arizona. 6. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns and performance metrics. The fixed fee component provides some cost certainty, but the cost-reimbursement nature requires diligent oversight to ensure efficiency. Comparing this to similar engineering services contracts within the DoD would be necessary for a more precise value assessment. The absence of a specific dollar amount for the fixed fee makes it difficult to gauge the contractor's profit margin and the overall value proposition for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, specific sources were excluded, potentially due to pre-existing contract vehicles or specific requirements. The number of bidders is not provided, making it difficult to assess the breadth of competition. This procurement method suggests a deliberate decision to limit the pool of potential offerors, which could impact price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may result in less competitive pricing for taxpayers compared to a truly full and open competition. However, the exclusion of sources might be justified by specific technical requirements or existing relationships that ensure a better fit for the government's needs.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from specialized engineering services to support its operations and infrastructure. This contract will likely deliver critical engineering expertise for defense projects. The geographic impact is primarily within Arizona, where the contractor is located, but the services may support broader DoD initiatives. The contract supports the defense industrial base by engaging a service provider.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Limited competition after exclusion of sources may reduce price competitiveness.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
- The specific nature of the engineering services and their impact on national security are not fully detailed.
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a specific company, indicating a need for their specialized engineering capabilities.
- The contract duration suggests a significant and ongoing requirement for engineering support.
- The procurement method, though limited, implies a structured process was followed.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services represent a significant segment of the federal contracting market, particularly within the defense sector. This contract falls under the broader category of professional, scientific, and technical services. The Department of Defense is a major consumer of these services, utilizing them for design, analysis, testing, and program management across various platforms and systems. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other DoD contracts for similar engineering disciplines and project scopes.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate if this contract included a small business set-aside or if there are subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem cannot be determined from this information alone. Further investigation into the contract details and awardee's subcontracting plan would be necessary.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, invoice review, and compliance checks are standard accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Engineering Services
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
- Delivery Orders
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage costs.
- Limited competition may impact price competitiveness.
- Contract performance history of the awardee is not detailed.
- Specific engineering services and their criticality are not fully elaborated.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, engineering-services, cost-plus-fixed-fee, delivery-order, limited-competition, arizona, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, contract-award
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.3 million to YULISTA GAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC. IEWTD AND TTD
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is YULISTA GAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-09-28. End: 2026-09-27.
What is the track record of YULISTA GAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC with the federal government, particularly in engineering services?
A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess YULISTA GAN TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC's track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any history of contract modifications or disputes. Understanding their experience with Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts and their performance in delivering engineering services for the Department of Defense or similar agencies would provide crucial context for evaluating their capability and reliability on this current award. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their past performance.
How does the estimated value of this contract compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the DoD?
To compare the value of this $10.3 million contract, one would need to analyze recent DoD awards for engineering services with similar scopes of work and durations. Factors such as the specific engineering disciplines required (e.g., mechanical, electrical, civil), the complexity of the projects, and the level of security clearance needed would influence pricing. If this contract represents a standard rate for the services provided, it could be considered competitive. However, if it is significantly higher or lower than comparable contracts, it would warrant further investigation into the reasons behind the discrepancy, such as unique requirements or market conditions.
What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for engineering services?
The primary risk with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs compared to a fixed-price contract, as costs are reimbursed. While the fixed fee provides a defined profit margin, the contractor could potentially incur higher costs, leading to a larger overall expenditure for the government. Effective risk mitigation requires robust government oversight, including detailed cost tracking, regular performance reviews, and clear communication channels to ensure the contractor remains focused on efficiency and delivering the required engineering services within the anticipated scope and quality standards.
What is the typical duration for engineering services contracts of this nature within the Department of Defense?
The duration of engineering services contracts within the Department of Defense can vary widely depending on the project's complexity, scope, and whether it's part of a larger program. A 729-day (approximately two-year) period, as indicated for this contract, is a common timeframe for significant engineering support tasks, such as system design, development, testing, or sustainment. Shorter contracts might be for specific studies or analyses, while longer-term contracts could extend over several years, often through multiple award IDIQ vehicles. This duration suggests a substantial and ongoing need for the engineering expertise being procured.
How does the procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' impact the government's ability to secure competitive pricing?
The procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies that while the competition was not restricted to a single source, certain potential offerors were intentionally excluded from the bidding process. This exclusion could be based on various factors, such as prior performance, specific technical capabilities, or the existence of other contract vehicles. While it allows for competition among a defined set of qualified vendors, it inherently limits the pool of bidders compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition. This limitation could potentially reduce the downward pressure on pricing, as the government may not benefit from the widest possible range of competitive offers.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W9115121R0012
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5015 BUSINESS PARK BLVD., ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $35,479,617
Exercised Options: $23,320,792
Current Obligation: $10,348,710
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9115123D0008
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-09-28
Current End Date: 2026-09-27
Potential End Date: 2027-09-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-13
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)