DoD's $16.2M JEMS Support Contract with Engility LLC: R&D Spending Analysis
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,223,236 ($16.2M)
Contractor: Engility LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-09-05
End Date: 2012-05-05
Contract Duration: 1,338 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: JEMS SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.2 million to ENGILITY LLC for work described as: JEMS SUPPORT Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Engility LLC for JEMS Support represents a significant R&D investment. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate procurement strategy. 3. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure warrants scrutiny for potential cost overruns. 4. Spending falls within the R&D sector, specifically Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 5. The contract duration of 1338 days indicates a long-term need for these services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully, as contractor incentives may not align perfectly with cost efficiency. Benchmarking CPFF contracts in R&D is complex due to unique project scopes.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The procurement utilized 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while competition was sought, specific sources were initially excluded. This method aims for broad competition while potentially focusing on specialized capabilities, impacting price discovery by limiting the initial pool of bidders.
Taxpayer Impact: The total award value of $16.2M represents taxpayer funds allocated to research and development. The effectiveness of this spending in achieving its R&D objectives will ultimately determine the true taxpayer impact.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded over $16 million for research and development services. The contract supported advancements in physical, engineering, and life sciences. The duration of the contract suggests a sustained effort in a specific R&D area. The specific nature of 'JEMS Support' is not detailed, limiting public understanding of the direct benefits.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure can incentivize higher spending.
- Limited transparency on specific 'JEMS Support' deliverables.
- Exclusion of sources in competition requires justification.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition was pursued.
- Contract awarded to a single entity, potentially for specialized expertise.
- Long-term commitment to R&D.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. Spending in this area is crucial for innovation but can be subject to cost overruns due to the inherent uncertainties of research. Benchmarks are difficult due to the bespoke nature of R&D projects.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). The CPFF structure necessitates robust oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and allocable to the contract's objectives.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
- Potential for cost overruns.
- Limited transparency on specific project deliverables.
- Competition method involved exclusion of sources.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.2 million to ENGILITY LLC. JEMS SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-09-05. End: 2012-05-05.
What specific R&D advancements or outcomes were achieved through the JEMS Support contract, and how do they align with the initial objectives and taxpayer investment?
The provided data lacks specifics on the 'JEMS Support' deliverables and outcomes. To assess value, a review of project reports, milestone achievements, and final deliverables against the contract's Statement of Work is necessary. Understanding the tangible advancements in physical, engineering, or life sciences resulting from the $16.2M investment is crucial for determining if the taxpayer funds yielded proportionate benefits and met the intended R&D goals.
Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure and the exclusion of certain sources, what were the primary risks related to cost control and fair market pricing for this contract?
The CPFF structure inherently carries a risk of cost escalation, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee, potentially reducing the incentive for strict cost management. The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition phase also poses a risk to achieving the best possible price, as it limits the bidder pool. Effective oversight and robust negotiation are critical to mitigate these risks and ensure fair market pricing.
How effective was the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in ensuring the government secured the best value for the JEMS Support R&D services?
The effectiveness hinges on the justification for excluding sources and the subsequent competitive process. If the excluded sources were essential for achieving optimal value, the method might be less effective. However, if the remaining pool still provided robust competition and the selected contractor offered superior technical merit and fair pricing, the method could be deemed effective. A detailed review of the source selection justification and evaluation criteria is needed.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Science Applications International Corporation
Address: 4803 STONECROFT BLVD, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,247,240
Exercised Options: $16,247,240
Current Obligation: $16,223,236
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-09-05
Current End Date: 2012-05-05
Potential End Date: 2012-05-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-31
More Contracts from Engility LLC
- Federal Contract — $363.5M (Department of Defense)
- Labor Worldwide Linguist Support Service — $363.0M (Department of Defense)
- Labor/Worldwide Linguist Support Service TAS::21 2020::TAS — $331.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200612!008781!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !daab0702dp001 !A!N! !Y!0107 ! !20060923!20061031!849594288!849594288!849594288!N!L-3 Communications Ilex System!1413 Cantillon Blvd !mays Landing !nj!08330!24480!025!34!fort Monmouth !monmouth !NEW Jersey!+000005082039!n!n!000000000000!r425!engineering Technical Services !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!004!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !d!d!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $325.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200211!004228!2100!AB07 !USA Communications-Electronics !daab0702dp001 !A!N! !Y!0018 !20020801!20061031!939131665!939131665!939131665!n!itel Solutions, an Ilex Telos !1413 Cantillion Blvd !mays Landing !nj!08330!24670!003!04!fort Huachuca !cochise !arizona !+000008312053!n!n!000000000000!r425!engineering Technical Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !513310!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!y!2!004!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !d!d!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! !gy0hk8!0001! — $219.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)