Raytheon Awarded $34.1M for FMS Romania Office, Part of Ongoing Support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $34,138,008 ($34.1M)
Contractor: Raytheon Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-03-14
End Date: 2027-02-28
Contract Duration: 1,081 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 17TH DELIVERY ORDER FOR FMS ROMANIA OFFICE
Place of Performance
Location: MCKINNEY, COLLIN County, TEXAS, 75071
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $34.1 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: 17TH DELIVERY ORDER FOR FMS ROMANIA OFFICE Key points: 1. Significant contract value for ongoing support services. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about price discovery. 3. Long-term contract duration (over 3 years) indicates sustained need. 4. Focus on navigation and guidance systems suggests critical operational support.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The $34.1M award for this delivery order appears to be part of a larger, potentially established contract. Without access to the base contract's pricing and comparison to similar FMS support contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult. The lack of competition suggests potential for overpricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This delivery order was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This method limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for this significant award may result in suboptimal pricing, impacting taxpayer value.
Public Impact
Supports U.S. foreign military sales efforts in Romania. Ensures continued operational readiness for supported assets. Potential for increased costs due to sole-source nature.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of transparency in pricing
- Long contract duration without competition
Positive Signals
- Supports critical foreign military sales
- Ensures operational continuity
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically supporting navigation and guidance systems. Spending in this area is often driven by national security needs and foreign policy objectives, with significant government investment.
Small Business Impact
The awardee, Raytheon Company, is a large defense contractor. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific delivery order, which is common for large sole-source awards.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is crucial for sole-source contracts to ensure fair pricing and prevent waste. The Department of the Army's contracting activity suggests established oversight mechanisms, but the lack of competition warrants scrutiny.
Related Government Programs
- Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition.
- Potential for cost overruns due to lack of competition.
- Long-term duration without competitive re-evaluation.
- Lack of transparency on base contract pricing.
Tags
search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, tx, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $34.1 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. 17TH DELIVERY ORDER FOR FMS ROMANIA OFFICE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $34.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-03-14. End: 2027-02-28.
What is the total value of the base contract from which this delivery order was issued, and how does its pricing compare to similar sole-source support contracts for FMS programs?
Determining the total value of the base contract is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the overall financial commitment. Benchmarking this pricing against similar sole-source support contracts for Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programs would reveal whether the government is receiving fair market value. Without this comparative data, it's challenging to assess the true cost-effectiveness of this award.
What specific justification was provided for awarding this delivery order on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was bypassed. Agencies must typically demonstrate that only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. Exploring whether alternative competitive strategies were considered, even if ultimately deemed unsuitable, provides insight into the diligence exercised in seeking the best value for taxpayer funds.
How will the effectiveness of the navigation and guidance systems supported by this contract be measured, and what are the key performance indicators (KPIs)?
Measuring the effectiveness of supported navigation and guidance systems is paramount to ensuring mission success and justifying the expenditure. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should be clearly defined and tracked, focusing on aspects like system reliability, accuracy, uptime, and contribution to operational objectives. Regular reporting and analysis of these KPIs will allow for assessment of contractor performance and overall program value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Rockwell Collins Australia PTY Limited
Address: 2501 W UNIVERSITY DR, MCKINNEY, TX, 75071
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $34,138,008
Exercised Options: $34,138,008
Current Obligation: $34,138,008
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 36
Total Subaward Amount: $7,691,394
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W909MY19D0015
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-03-14
Current End Date: 2027-02-28
Potential End Date: 2027-02-28 12:02:00
Last Modified: 2025-03-27
More Contracts from Raytheon Company
- Federal Contract — $5.7B (Department of Defense)
- TEN Fire Units for Qatar — $5.6B (Department of Defense)
- GPS Advanced Control Segment (OCX) Phase B Blocks 1 and 2 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
- An/Spy-6(v) Hardware Production — $3.3B (Department of Defense)
- Predominant - Patriot UAE — $3.0B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)