DoD awards $8.2M engineering services task order to OST Inc. for TADSS support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $8,245,505 ($8.2M)
Contractor: OST Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-02-15
End Date: 2026-02-14
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: TASK ORDER PROJECT LEAD TADSS SUPPORT OPERATIONS
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32826
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $8.2 million to OST INC for work described as: TASK ORDER PROJECT LEAD TADSS SUPPORT OPERATIONS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a one-year engineering support task order. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. No specific risk indicators are immediately apparent from the provided data. 4. This contract supports the Department of the Army's training and simulation needs. 5. Engineering services are a critical component of defense readiness and modernization. 6. The contract is a firm fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The $8.2 million award for a 364-day task order for TADSS Support Operations appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized engineering services. Without specific benchmarks for TADSS support, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests cost control by the government. The contract value per day is approximately $22,652, which needs to be evaluated against similar engineering support contracts for specialized training systems.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on pre-qualification or other criteria. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competitive environment, which should lead to better price discovery and value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government receives the best possible value.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from enhanced training capabilities through the support of Training, Auditing, Development, and Simulation Systems (TADSS). This contract delivers essential engineering services to maintain and improve critical training infrastructure. The geographic impact is focused on Florida, where the contractor is located. The contract supports specialized engineering roles, potentially impacting the technical workforce in the defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
- Full and Open Competition utilized.
- Contract duration of 364 days allows for focused support.
- Awarded to OST Inc., an established entity in engineering services.
Sector Analysis
The engineering services sector, particularly within defense, is characterized by high specialization and significant government investment. This contract falls under NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services), a broad category encompassing design, consulting, and project management for various industries. The defense sector relies heavily on such services for the development, maintenance, and modernization of complex systems, including training simulators like TADSS. Spending in this area is driven by the need for advanced military readiness and technological superiority.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) is false for this specific award. Therefore, this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have explicit subcontracting requirements for small businesses based on the limited data. This means opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are likely limited unless they are prime contractors or subcontractors to OST Inc. outside of formal set-aside provisions.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program executive office within the Department of the Army. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by limiting cost overruns. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse, ensuring accountability.
Related Government Programs
- TADSS Support Operations
- Engineering Services Contracts
- Department of Defense IT and Support Services
- Army Training Systems Procurement
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, engineering-services, task-order, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, tadss-support, florida, defense-contracting, training-systems
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $8.2 million to OST INC. TASK ORDER PROJECT LEAD TADSS SUPPORT OPERATIONS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is OST INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $8.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-02-15. End: 2026-02-14.
What is OST Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in engineering services and TADSS support?
OST Inc. has a history of performing various services for the Department of Defense, including engineering and technical support. While specific details on their track record with TADSS are not provided in this data snippet, their designation as a recipient of this task order suggests they possess the requisite capabilities and past performance. A deeper dive into their contract history within FPDS or SAM.gov would reveal the scope, value, and performance ratings of their previous DoD contracts, offering a clearer picture of their experience and reliability in similar domains.
How does the $8.2 million value compare to similar TADSS support contracts awarded by the DoD?
Benchmarking this $8.2 million award requires comparing it to similar task orders for TADSS support operations or related engineering services within the Department of Defense. Factors such as contract duration (364 days), scope of work (engineering services), and specific system requirements heavily influence pricing. Without access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents excellent, fair, or questionable value. However, the firm fixed-price nature and full and open competition suggest an effort to secure competitive pricing for the defined scope.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Potential risks for this contract could include technical performance issues, schedule delays, or cost overruns if not managed effectively, although the firm fixed-price structure aims to mitigate cost risks. Given the nature of engineering services for training systems, ensuring the contractor's technical expertise remains current with evolving technologies is also a consideration. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract oversight by the government, clear performance metrics, and regular communication channels between the contracting officer's representative and OST Inc. The 'full and open competition' also serves as a risk mitigator by selecting a capable provider.
How effective is the current TADSS support infrastructure, and how does this contract contribute to its overall effectiveness?
The effectiveness of the current TADSS support infrastructure is crucial for realistic military training. This contract directly contributes to that effectiveness by ensuring the necessary engineering services are provided for the maintenance, repair, and potential upgrades of these systems. The specific contribution depends on the detailed Statement of Work, but generally, such contracts aim to minimize downtime, enhance system reliability, and ensure training scenarios accurately reflect operational environments. The success of this contract would be measured by the improved readiness and training outcomes it enables for the supported military personnel.
What are the historical spending patterns for TADSS support operations and related engineering services within the Department of the Army?
Historical spending on TADSS support operations and related engineering services within the Department of the Army typically fluctuates based on modernization cycles, training requirements, and budget allocations. The Army invests significantly in training systems to maintain a high level of combat readiness. Analyzing past spending data from sources like FPDS would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured. This specific $8.2 million award should be viewed within the context of these broader historical expenditures to assess its relative scale and importance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2101 L ST NW SUITE 800, WASHINGTON, DC, 20037
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $8,801,293
Exercised Options: $8,801,293
Current Obligation: $8,245,505
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W900KK17D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-02-15
Current End Date: 2026-02-14
Potential End Date: 2026-02-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-03
More Contracts from OST Inc
- Program Management and Insurance Services in Support of the National Flood Insurance Program's Bureau and Statistical Servicing Agent. These Services Include Financial and Statistical Reporting and Analysis; Underwriting, Claims, and Development of ALL Program Materials, Manuals, Bulletins, and Forms — $113.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
- "itar-14-2728 Itss-Cc Contract CO: Stephen Mostow COR / Tech POC: Debra Kelleher " Igf::ot::igf — $52.9M (Department of Transportation)
- National Flood Insurance Program IT Systems and Support — $49.5M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Provide Standard Insurance Operations Support Including Insurance Subject Matter Expertise and Standard Business Operations — $41.9M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Nfip STD OPS T01 — $31.6M (Department of Homeland Security)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)