DoD's $134M Flight School Training Support Contract Awarded to General Dynamics IT
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $134,384,655 ($134.4M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-04-01
End Date: 2025-03-31
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $369.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: LOT YEAR II TASK ORDER BEING ISSUED IN SUPPORT OF FLIGHT SCHOOL TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES.
Place of Performance
Location: DALEVILLE, DALE County, ALABAMA, 36322
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $134.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: LOT YEAR II TASK ORDER BEING ISSUED IN SUPPORT OF FLIGHT SCHOOL TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in military aviation readiness. 2. General Dynamics IT's selection suggests a competitive process, but details on bidder numbers are needed. 3. Performance risk appears moderate given the nature of training support services. 4. This contract aligns with broader DoD efforts to modernize training infrastructure. 5. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs for the government. 6. Geographic concentration in Alabama warrants attention for regional economic impact.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of $134.4 million over one year for flight school training support services is substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training support contracts within the DoD is crucial for a precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type suggests that cost control is a priority, with the contractor bearing the risk of cost overruns. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to industry standards for similar services, a definitive assessment of pricing efficiency is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. However, the specific number of bidders and the evaluation criteria used are not detailed here. A higher number of bidders typically suggests stronger price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through robust bidding. It ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, thereby encouraging competitive pricing and innovation.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and its flight school trainees, who will receive enhanced support services. Services delivered include essential support functions for flight training operations, ensuring readiness and efficiency. The contract's geographic impact is concentrated in Alabama, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the region. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for support staff, instructors, and administrative personnel within the contractor's organization.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if training requirements evolve significantly beyond initial estimates.
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical training support functions.
- Ensuring adequate oversight to maintain service quality and compliance over the contract term.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive pricing environment.
- Award to a large, established contractor like General Dynamics IT may indicate a lower risk of performance failure.
Sector Analysis
The defense training sector is a critical component of national security, encompassing a wide range of services from simulation to operational readiness support. This contract falls within the broader 'Other Support Services' category, which is a significant market for government contractors. The total addressable market for defense training services is substantial, with ongoing investments driven by evolving threats and technological advancements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale training support contracts awarded by the DoD and its branches.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside criterion for this specific award. While General Dynamics IT is a large prime contractor, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The extent of subcontracting to small businesses will be a key factor in assessing the contract's impact on the small business ecosystem. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting goals were established and met.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance work statement (PWS), with defined deliverables and quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs). Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Training and Simulation Programs
- Army Aviation Training Command Contracts
- Logistics and Support Services for Military Operations
- Defense Contractor Performance Management
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly despite FFP.
- Dependence on contractor for critical training support functions.
- Need for robust quality assurance to ensure training standards are met.
Tags
defense, department-of-the-army, training-support, general-dynamics-it, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, alabama, large-contract, aviation-training, support-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $134.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. LOT YEAR II TASK ORDER BEING ISSUED IN SUPPORT OF FLIGHT SCHOOL TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $134.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-04-01. End: 2025-03-31.
What is General Dynamics Information Technology's track record with similar large-scale training support contracts for the Department of Defense?
General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) has a long history of supporting the Department of Defense across various service domains, including IT, logistics, and training support. They have previously held significant contracts for complex military training programs, often involving large dollar values and extended performance periods. Analyzing GDIT's past performance on similar contracts would involve reviewing contract award histories, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any documented instances of contract modifications, disputes, or successful program completions. Their experience suggests a capacity to manage large, complex service delivery requirements, but a detailed review of specific past training support contracts would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and historical success rate in this particular niche.
How does the $134.4 million contract value compare to historical spending on flight school training support by the Department of the Army?
The $134.4 million contract value represents a significant annual investment in flight school training support services for the Department of the Army. To benchmark this against historical spending, one would need to examine prior fiscal years' expenditures on similar training support contracts. This would involve querying federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending) for contracts with comparable service descriptions (e.g., flight training support, aviation maintenance support, simulation services) awarded to the Army or its aviation branches. Analyzing trends in annual spending, average contract values, and the number of awarded contracts over time would provide context. A sudden increase or decrease in spending could indicate shifts in training priorities, budget allocations, or the adoption of new training methodologies.
What are the primary performance risks associated with this flight school training support contract, and how are they mitigated?
Primary performance risks for a flight school training support contract include potential disruptions to training schedules due to contractor-related issues (e.g., personnel shortages, equipment failures), failure to meet required training standards or safety protocols, and challenges in adapting to evolving training requirements or technologies. Mitigation strategies typically involve a robust Performance Work Statement (PWS) clearly defining requirements and performance standards, a comprehensive Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) to monitor contractor performance, and the use of incentives or penalties tied to performance outcomes. The firm-fixed-price contract type also shifts some financial risk to the contractor. Regular communication and collaboration between the government and the contractor are essential for proactive risk management and issue resolution.
What is the expected impact of this contract on the readiness and effectiveness of Army aviation personnel?
This contract is expected to have a positive impact on the readiness and effectiveness of Army aviation personnel by ensuring the consistent and high-quality delivery of essential training support services. Reliable support for flight schools means that training pipelines can operate efficiently, allowing more aviators to complete their training on schedule. This includes ensuring that training facilities are operational, simulators are functional, administrative support is in place, and potentially even direct support for instructors or training curriculum. By outsourcing these support functions to a specialized contractor like General Dynamics IT, the Army can focus its organic resources on core aviation training and combat readiness missions, ultimately contributing to a more skilled and prepared aviation force.
How does the concentration of this contract in Alabama affect the regional economy and workforce?
The award of a $134.4 million contract to General Dynamics IT, with services likely performed in Alabama (based on the 'st': 'AL', 'sn': 'ALABAMA' fields), is expected to have a significant positive impact on the regional economy and workforce. This includes the direct creation of jobs within GDIT's operations in Alabama, encompassing roles such as program management, administrative support, technical specialists, and potentially instructors or training facilitators. Furthermore, the contract can stimulate indirect economic activity through local procurement of goods and services by GDIT and its subcontractors, as well as increased spending by employees in the local economy. This influx of federal spending can bolster the state's defense contracting sector and contribute to overall economic growth.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Other Support Services › All Other Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W900KK22R0003
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp
Address: 3150 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 100, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $134,384,655
Exercised Options: $134,384,655
Current Obligation: $134,384,655
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 5
Total Subaward Amount: $93,264,056
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W900KK23D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-04-01
Current End Date: 2025-03-31
Potential End Date: 2025-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-08-14
More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
- Global Security Engineering&supply Chain Services — $1.5B (Department of State)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a NEW Contract With General Dynamics Information Technology for Global Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Technology Development Services to Support the Department of State. the Initial Funding Associated With This Contract IS $22,304,578.00. the Overall Contract Value IS $2,200,000,000.00 — $1.2B (Department of State)
- Cloud Products&tools (CPT) — $902.0M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Beneficiary Contact Center Operations — $879.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Award of Task Order 47qfca210051-Nawcad Wolf Ship and AIR C5isr Systems Support — $832.3M (General Services Administration)
View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)