DoD awards $22.1M contract for range maintenance services at Fort Bliss, Texas
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,131,572 ($22.1M)
Contractor: General Dynamics ONE Source LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-09-15
End Date: 2025-09-15
Contract Duration: 731 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FT. BLISS RANGE 88 DMPRC CTR TIER 2
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32826
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.1 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC for work described as: FT. BLISS RANGE 88 DMPRC CTR TIER 2 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical training infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this service. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictable spending. 4. Contract duration of two years allows for sustained service delivery. 5. Geographic focus on Fort Bliss, Texas, highlights specific installation needs. 6. The award to General Dynamics One Source LLC indicates a known entity in defense contracting.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $22.1 million over two years for range maintenance at Fort Bliss appears reasonable given the scope of services typically required for large military installations. Benchmarking against similar contracts for base operations support or specialized maintenance at other large Army posts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an expectation of cost control by the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the full and open nature suggests a robust selection process.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through competitive bidding and encourages a wider range of contractors to offer their services.
Public Impact
Service members training at Fort Bliss will benefit from well-maintained and safe firing ranges. The contract supports the operational readiness of the U.S. Army at a key training installation. Geographic impact is concentrated in El Paso, Texas, supporting local economic activity through contractor operations. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for personnel involved in range maintenance and operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if maintenance requirements are not clearly defined.
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical training infrastructure availability.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these services.
- Contract duration allows for consistent service delivery.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader defense sector, specifically supporting base operations and maintenance. The market for defense support services is substantial, with numerous companies specializing in facility management, logistics, and specialized technical services for military installations. This contract represents a typical expenditure for maintaining the extensive infrastructure required for large Army posts like Fort Bliss.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if General Dynamics One Source LLC has a history of subcontracting with small businesses on similar contracts. The absence of a set-aside suggests larger prime contractors were expected to compete.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program executive office within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support Services
- Military Range Maintenance
- Department of Defense Facilities Management
- Army Training Infrastructure Support
Risk Flags
- Environmental compliance risks
- Safety hazards associated with ordnance and heavy machinery
- Potential for training disruptions due to range unavailability
- Contractor performance and adherence to maintenance schedules
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, fort-bliss, texas, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-service-industry-machinery-manufacturing, maintenance-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.1 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC. FT. BLISS RANGE 88 DMPRC CTR TIER 2
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-09-15. End: 2025-09-15.
What is the historical spending pattern for range maintenance at Fort Bliss?
Analyzing historical spending for range maintenance at Fort Bliss requires access to detailed contract databases beyond the provided data. Typically, such services are procured through multi-year contracts or a series of delivery orders against indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicles. Previous awards for similar services at Fort Bliss would indicate whether this $22.1 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment. Factors influencing historical spending include changes in training requirements, infrastructure upgrades, and the competitive landscape for maintenance providers. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to establish a trend, but the current award suggests a consistent need for these services.
How does the contractor, General Dynamics One Source LLC, perform on other government contracts?
General Dynamics One Source LLC is a significant defense contractor with a broad portfolio of services. Assessing their performance on other government contracts would involve reviewing their past performance evaluations, any reported contract disputes, and their track record with various federal agencies. Companies of this size often have extensive experience, but performance can vary across different contract types and agencies. A review of public databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would provide insights into their reliability, quality of work, and adherence to contract terms on prior engagements. This specific contract's performance will also contribute to their overall record.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this range maintenance contract?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) for a range maintenance contract typically focus on ensuring the safety, functionality, and readiness of the training ranges. These might include metrics such as the percentage of ranges available for use within scheduled times, response times for maintenance requests, adherence to safety protocols and environmental regulations, and the quality of repairs. The contract's Service Level Agreements (SLAs) would define these KPIs and the associated remedies or incentives for meeting or failing to meet them. While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, they are crucial for the government to monitor contractor performance and ensure value for money.
What is the estimated cost per acre or per range maintained under this contract?
Calculating an estimated cost per acre or per range requires detailed information on the total acreage or number of ranges covered by the contract, which is not provided. The $22.1 million contract value is for comprehensive maintenance services over two years. To derive a per-unit cost, one would need to know the exact scope of work, including the number and types of ranges, the specific maintenance tasks (e.g., vegetation control, berm repair, target system upkeep), and the total area managed. Without these specifics, any per-unit cost calculation would be speculative and lack a solid basis for comparison.
Are there any known risks associated with range maintenance services at military installations?
Yes, there are several known risks associated with range maintenance services at military installations. Environmental risks include potential soil and water contamination from ordnance residue, requiring careful management and remediation. Safety risks are paramount, involving hazards from unexploded ordnance, heavy machinery operation, and the inherent dangers of live-fire exercises. Operational risks include the potential for range downtime due to maintenance issues, impacting training schedules and readiness. Furthermore, there are risks related to contractor performance, such as failure to meet service level agreements, cost overruns (though mitigated by fixed-price contracts), and security vulnerabilities. Effective risk management strategies, including robust safety protocols, environmental monitoring, and strong contract oversight, are essential.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W900KK17R0023
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Wico Limited
Address: 3150 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 100, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,131,572
Exercised Options: $22,131,572
Current Obligation: $22,131,572
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 5
Total Subaward Amount: $1,767,737
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W900KK18D0031
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-09-15
Current End Date: 2025-09-15
Potential End Date: 2025-09-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-07-16
More Contracts from General Dynamics ONE Source LLC
- THE Scope of DHS TIP IS to Create a Physically and Logically Diverse and Redundant Campus Infrastructure That Will Support Everything on and Within the Perimeter Fence. Open System Interconnection Reference Model (OSI Reference Model or OSI Model) Layer 1 - Physical Layer and Layer 2 - Data-Link Layer ARE Included in Their Entirety for the Campus. Aspects of Layer 3 - Network Layer ARE Partially Included, AS ARE Higher Layers for On-Site Specialized Systems (E.G., Security, Smart Buildings Applications, and Fire Safety Systems.) — $265.8M (General Services Administration)
- Uscis Tomis — $226.6M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Sets Award — $225.2M (General Services Administration)
- Remote Video Surveillance System Upgrade — $216.5M (Department of Homeland Security)
- IT Unclassified Igf::ot::igf — $178.9M (Department of Defense)
View all General Dynamics ONE Source LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)