DoD's Directorate of Training contract awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for $40.7M supports Military Intelligence operations
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $40,686,370 ($40.7M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2019-07-01
End Date: 2024-07-02
Contract Duration: 1,828 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: THE DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING (DOT) PROVIDES INSTRUCTION, TRAINING DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING SUPPORT FOR MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (MI) OPERATIONS AT EVERY ECHELON IN ANY ENVIRONMENT. TO REALIZE THIS OBJECTIVE, THE DOT MUST SUSTAIN A MI SCHOOLHOUSE.
Place of Performance
Location: FORT HUACHUCA, COCHISE County, ARIZONA, 85613
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $40.7 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: THE DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING (DOT) PROVIDES INSTRUCTION, TRAINING DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING SUPPORT FOR MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (MI) OPERATIONS AT EVERY ECHELON IN ANY ENVIRONMENT. TO REALIZE THIS OBJECTIVE, THE DOT MUST SUSTAIN A MI SCHOOLHOUSE. Key points: 1. The contract supports critical Military Intelligence (MI) training and development across all echelons. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. is the sole awardee for this delivery order. 3. The contract duration is approximately 5 years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 5. The National Industry Classification (NAICS) code 611430 suggests a focus on professional and management development training. 6. The contract is being performed in Arizona (AZ).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure cost efficiency. While the total award is $40.7 million over five years, specific performance metrics and value-for-money assessments are not detailed in the provided data. Benchmarking against similar training contracts would be necessary for a more definitive value assessment. The fixed fee component provides some cost certainty for the contractor's effort.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. However, the data does not specify the number of bidders that participated. A competitive process generally fosters better pricing and service quality, but without knowing the number of offers received, it's difficult to fully assess the extent of price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to bid, potentially driving down costs and improving the quality of services received.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are military personnel requiring specialized training for Military Intelligence operations. The contract delivers essential instruction, training development, and support services to sustain the MI Schoolhouse. Services are delivered across all echelons of Military Intelligence, ensuring widespread operational readiness. The geographic impact is primarily within Arizona, where the training is conducted.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can incentivize contractor to incur costs, requiring robust oversight to manage expenses.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the training delivered.
- The duration of the contract (5 years) necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure continued alignment with evolving MI needs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process.
- The contract supports a critical national security function: Military Intelligence training.
- The contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., is established and likely has experience in this domain.
Sector Analysis
The defense training sector is a significant market, with government agencies like the Department of Defense being major clients. This contract falls under professional and management development training, a segment focused on enhancing skills and operational capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale training contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies for specialized skill development.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by this award. The focus appears to be on securing the best overall solution through full and open competition, rather than specifically targeting small business engagement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be defined within the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Military Intelligence Training Programs
- Defense Education and Training Services
- Professional Development Contracts
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type requires diligent cost oversight.
- Lack of specific performance metrics hinders assessment of training effectiveness.
- Contract duration necessitates ongoing monitoring for relevance and efficiency.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, amentum-technology-inc, directorate-of-training, military-intelligence, professional-and-management-development-training, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, arizona, training-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $40.7 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. THE DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING (DOT) PROVIDES INSTRUCTION, TRAINING DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING SUPPORT FOR MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (MI) OPERATIONS AT EVERY ECHELON IN ANY ENVIRONMENT. TO REALIZE THIS OBJECTIVE, THE DOT MUST SUSTAIN A MI SCHOOLHOUSE.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $40.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-07-01. End: 2024-07-02.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with similar DoD training contracts?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant presence in the government contracting space, including extensive work with the Department of Defense. While specific details on their past performance for identical Military Intelligence training contracts are not provided in this data snippet, their award of this $40.7 million contract suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience. A deeper dive into their contract history, past performance reviews, and any relevant awards or penalties would be required for a comprehensive assessment of their track record in this specific domain. Their ability to secure a full and open competition award indicates a competitive standing among potential providers.
How does the $40.7 million cost compare to similar military intelligence training contracts?
Directly comparing the $40.7 million cost to similar Military Intelligence (MI) training contracts requires access to a broader dataset of comparable awards. Factors such as the scope of training, duration, specific skill sets covered, and the number of personnel trained significantly influence contract value. This contract spans approximately five years, suggesting an average annual cost of roughly $8.14 million. Without specific benchmarks for MI training of comparable complexity and duration, it's challenging to definitively label this cost as high or low. However, the full and open competition aspect suggests market forces were at play to determine a competitive price.
What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for training services?
The primary risk associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for training services is the potential for cost overruns. In a CPFF structure, the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. If the contractor's costs exceed initial estimates, the government bears the burden of these increased expenses. This can incentivize less cost-conscious behavior from the contractor, as their profit (the fixed fee) remains constant regardless of the actual costs incurred. Effective oversight, stringent cost controls, and clear definition of allowable costs are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure value for the government.
How effective is the Directorate of Training (DOT) in meeting its objectives with this contract?
The provided data states the Directorate of Training's objective is to 'provide instruction, training development and training support for Military Intelligence (MI) operations at every echelon in any environment' by sustaining a 'MI Schoolhouse.' This contract directly supports that objective. However, the data does not include metrics on the effectiveness of the training delivered, such as trainee performance improvements, operational readiness enhancements, or mission success rates attributable to the training. Assessing the program's effectiveness would require analyzing post-training performance data and feedback from the military intelligence community.
What are the historical spending patterns for MI training by the Department of the Army?
Historical spending patterns for Military Intelligence (MI) training by the Department of the Army are not detailed in the provided data. This specific contract represents a $40.7 million award over approximately five years. To understand broader historical trends, one would need to examine aggregated spending data for NAICS code 611430 (Professional and Management Development Training) or specific contract vehicles related to MI training over multiple fiscal years. Analyzing trends would reveal whether spending on MI training has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and how this particular award fits into that larger picture.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training
Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W900KK17R0014
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 5401 W KENNEDY BLVD STE 900, TAMPA, FL, 33609
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $42,212,342
Exercised Options: $42,212,342
Current Obligation: $40,686,370
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 16
Total Subaward Amount: $30,660,690
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W900KK19D0004
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-07-01
Current End Date: 2024-07-02
Potential End Date: 2024-07-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-10-31
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)